As with everything else, it's all down to money. Whomever else is in the LB room, they have to be given a chance to sink or swim. I'd offer that, if BW was in Seattle in 22, the glaring need at LB would still be a relatively low priority. BWs absence showed there's an immediate and urgent need. Yes, he could/would bring improvement in 23. But, if the cost is so high it either a)replaces the possibility of signing a younger, more long-term FA or b)takes considerable snaps from rookies/other FAs/current LBs, it's too high. If BWagz is content to play limited snaps and act more as a player-coach on a small contract, great. But, he's more valuable than that to a "win-now" team. Further, I'd love to see BWagz get another ring (with one caveat) and I think he has better odds elsewhere in the immediate season. That caveat being: not in SF.