BigMeach
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,073
- Reaction score
- 480
Hasselbeck":fmu95uib said:knownone":fmu95uib said:4 INTs... I think he's wrong about our defense. Obviously they didn't play a great game, but any team coming in here expecting to throw it 50 times and win is crazy.
I'm with you, no need to change anything.
3 of INT's were total gifts.
The defense played awful.
Seen a few people say this now. What INT isn't a gift? There were also at least 3 int's more we should have had on top of the fact that every time we seem to cause a fumble it either immediately falls under the player who fumbled or goes out of bounds. There is luck involved in 90+% of turnovers.
Was Sherman's pic on the 2 point conversion not earned? Lane's on the 4th down play? Kam Chancellor making an amazing play to catch it and stay in bounds along with Shead(forget if it was him for sure) knocking it away from defender to allow the play? Ruben making a heads up play for a Dlineman?
You might be able to make an argument for the Brown fall and Sherman pic as a gift but I'm confident Sherman is in position to still make that play without Brown falling down and if not he will not let Brown catch it.
If you do mean they weren't earned by calling them gifts than I strongly disagree. The mere fact they had to throw it so much against our defense makes them earned.