SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
Thx for sharing.
Well there are structures then there are structures. Our last franchise QB has his own 'srructure'.My brother in christ, Daniel Jones isn't even good enough in the system of Daboll to be called a system quarterback.
Geno plays really well within structure, yes. He had some good offscript moments last year, but he's definitely a quarterback who plays best in structure. That's not really being a "system quarterback." Every QB plays within a system. The ones who try to play independent of the offensive system they're in simply fail.
Daboll must see some potential in Jones, why else hitch your young HC coaching career to him?My brother in christ, Daniel Jones isn't even good enough in the system of Daboll to be called a system quarterback.
Geno plays really well within structure, yes. He had some good offscript moments last year, but he's definitely a quarterback who plays best in structure. That's not really being a "system quarterback." Every QB plays within a system. The ones who try to play independent of the offensive system they're in simply fail.
Speculation in this case is neither negative nor positive.Because you don't actually KNOW what his "Market Value" is or would have been had he not signed to stay with the team that gave him his SHOT to prove he still has it, and you DO NOT KNOW if he wouldn't have drawn interest from another Quarterback needy team.
'Negative Speculation' that's all you post, because that's all you have.
That doesn't prove SH*T!Speculation in this case is neither negative nor positive.
The only negative in this case is the metaphorical dog that didn’t bark. Zero rumors of another team pursuing him, an agent with ample opportunity to feel out the market during the combine, and ultimately signing an extremely team friendly deal well below the franchise level that many assumed he’d command.
Thank you for adding the hyphens, definite improvement to the persuasiveness of your viewpoint.That doesn't prove SH*T!
IF Non- G-R-E-E-D-Y Geno told his Agent to work out the best deal he could, where he CAN STILL STAY A SEAHAWK, (something that LOOK AT ME-3 would NEVER have done), you A-S-S-U-M-E that there wasn't ANY Quarterback starving Team that wouldn't have given him a hell of a lot more?...Yeah, that shows that it's Y-O-U who wouldn't have done right by the HC & Organization that stood behind Geno when the chips were down.
YOU DON'T K-N-O-W that he wasn't about to be offered MORE MONEY, Y-O-U don't K-N-O-W what Y-O-U don't K-N-O-W, so why do YOU "Speculate" from the Posterior Cavity?
I think he's a two-year bridge who can keep them moderately competitive, but he doesn't have Genos upside or arm talent.Daboll must see some potential in Jones, why else hitch your young HC coaching career to him?
You're welcome, although I KNOW that everything I posted is flying right the hell over your head....Work on your "Reading Comprehension", you'll be amazed at how much that others have grown, and LEARNED from just going beyond blustering blah, blah Bullsh*t Pelvis.Thank you for adding the hyphens, definite improvement to the persuasiveness of your viewpoint.
Man you post weird shit. NO one on .net has remotely indicated in any way that Geno is the next Unitas or is the best QB in Seahawks history.You didnt notice the picks and bad decisions? Ok, no big deal. I know most fans have already labeled him as the next Johnny Unitas and best QB the Seahawks have ever had so we'll just leave it at that. We'll just have to wait and see how the next few years play out.
My brother in christ, Daniel Jones isn't even good enough in the system of Daboll to be called a system quarterback.
Geno plays really well within structure, yes. He had some good offscript moments last year, but he's definitely a quarterback who plays best in structure. That's not really being a "system quarterback." Every QB plays within a system. The ones who try to play independent of the offensive system they're in simply fail.
Obviously you would make a post like that as you still use ME3 as your avatar. This was a great contract for the club and does not ham-string the club like ME3 did.I think the incentives is going to be the downfall for this deal. Geno seems to be at his best when there is no pressure. Im sure the money will be in his head at times trying to make/force plays. He was very careless in the second half of the season.
I still think we should have just improve the defense and go w/ Lock or a rookie QB. This deal does have a good safety net for the Seahawks though.
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, Same shit, different day.Lol. Wilson won a lot when he had to abandon the pathetic gameplan or did you forget about that?
No, he wouldn't follow the gameplan, and this was true with several offensive coordinators. That's when he started sucking worst of all. When he'd beat his lil uptempo, offense-runs-through-him drum and go all Let Russ Cook.Lol. Wilson won a lot when he had to abandon the pathetic gameplan or did you forget about that?
wait, how did wilson play last year with the broncos?Lol. Wilson won a lot when he had to abandon the pathetic gameplan or did you forget about that?
In before he comes back with "that was because the gameplans were bad!" after saying Wilson succeeded by ditching gameplans.wait, how did wilson play last year with the broncos?
oh that's right he was the worst starting QB in the league.
To be fair, it is a nice, red flag that make it much easier to skip over with just the shortest glance.Thank you for adding the hyphens, definite improvement to the persuasiveness of your viewpoint.
I comprehend you just fine, however, you’re usually having a completely divergent conversation.You're welcome, although I KNOW that everything I posted is flying right the hell over your head....Work on your "Reading Comprehension", you'll be amazed at how much that others have grown, and LEARNED from just going beyond blustering blah, blah Bullsh*t Pelvis.