MORGULON
Well-known member
Imagine what McVay could do with JSN?The fact that the Rams have been able to showcase Puka while JSN is MIA is criminal
Or the coach for the Dolphins .
Imagine what McVay could do with JSN?The fact that the Rams have been able to showcase Puka while JSN is MIA is criminal
Here are the link numbers prior to yesterday's game - https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/red-zone-scoring-pct?date=2023-09-23Show me the link. Shom me the numbers. The percentage of times that the offense scored a touchdown from within the red zone through the first two games of 2024. Quantifiable measures please. Then compare that measure against the league average.
The two tight end set is a great, effective set for Seattle. It gives JSN lovers some angst though, robbing him of some attention. When two tight ends are in the game, it is the slot receiver that is coming out. JSN will inevitably find his day in the sun. For now, in the early season, the veteran play and production is coming from the tight end position. For good reason.
Here are the link numbers prior to yesterday's game - https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/red-zone-scoring-pct?date=2023-09-23
After yesterday's game, here are the updated numbers - https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/red-zone-scoring-pct?date=2023-09-25
The last thing is I want is a team cowering to an individual preference over what the team needs. If a play is successful then do what's working until the other team stops it. If it ruffles some individuals, so be it. JSN doesn't seem to be a selfish player. So I don't think he will be bothered too much about it.
True, but at the same time 5 FGs is better than five punts. Especially with a backup O Line. They hung 37 on them.The end of last season, Seattle ranked 27th. So, they have moved up thirteen spots after three games. Still, five field goal attempts in one half reminds me much more of last year than not.
To be fair, that 4th down stop in the 4th qtr at their 35 or so is effectively a "turnover." It gave us a short field and led to the TD that locked the game down.Scores in the high 30s often reflect a turnover or more. We did not benefit from any of those this week. That's significant!
Solidify the offensive line and look out.
Good point, sutz. And you're right about that.To be fair, that 4th down stop in the 4th qtr at their 35 or so is effectively a "turnover." It gave us a short field and led to the TD that locked the game down.
Interesting point... Maybe teams will start doing deep, even Hail Mary, passes on long 3rd downs just outside FG range; if it gets picked, probably as good as a punt. Analytics... if analytics show there is positive risk/reward for the deep shot. So many coaches who go for it now on 4th downs based on analytics.Good point, sutz. And you're right about that.
The truth is any time the other team punts, the ball is being turned over. It's why a deep shot on 3rd down that gets intercepted is much like a punt, too. Statistics on such plays don't tell the entire story.
Imagine, though, if our offense had benefited from a fumble or INT!
True, but at the same time 5 FGs is better than five punts. Especially with a backup O Line. They hung 37 on them.