That was a fumble..

Mad Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
843
It was close but I think the hand moved forward with control for a millisecond before the ball was dislodged. Replay guys probably were able to slow it down enough to see that.
 

SweepSanFran

Active member
Joined
Feb 7, 2024
Messages
146
Reaction score
135
Location
Carson, WA
It was close but I think the hand moved forward with control for a millisecond before the ball was dislodged. Replay guys probably were able to slow it down enough to see that.
There's the rub in all this. How can we look at something in real time and go that's a fumble and the replay booth can slow it down using video that is 10,000 frames per second and go and change the call. They are pushing this replay thing to a point where no Referee's eye can actually digest that information at that speed and they change the call. It is supposed to be clear and obvious. What does that mean? When you can slow it down that much, it cant be clear and obvious in real time to the referee. this is where I jump off the replay train. Hell lets just use AI to call the game if this is what they are going to do.

End of replay rant.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
44,563
Reaction score
28,662
Location
Sammamish, WA
Just watched the replay. His arm and elbow are moving forward. Correct call, imo. And an extremely lucky break for Cryler and the Turds.
 
Top