Sperrydogg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2023
- Messages
- 7,579
- Reaction score
- 5,828
I don’t believe we have seen the best of this offense yet
I think he’s being modest.
You don’t think Mike knows what he wants his offense to be? Maybe kubiak was responsible for the nuances, but I still believe the offense is mikes. It was mikes last year and grubb didn’t do it right. It was mikes this year and Kubiak conformed to the vision. Kubiak is fine. But I’m not so worried that he is irreplaceable. I believe we will be even more dynamic next year under a new OCNope, just smart enough to know what he doesn’t know and fire the last guy who couldn’t get it done and hired someone who could.
Now let’s remember we just win the freakin Super Bowl
I didn’t say he sucks. But I do think he did just enoughWow. You’ve got the bar set high. Top 10 offense, but he sucks?
You are correct. I don't understand large corporations. I do own a small corporation and understand that very well. Honestly, I have terrible spelling as do most people with dyslexia.YOu clearly dont grasp how a large corporation works
And spelling it offence Goes to show you are from the UK and should probably stick to cricket
Not how that works.... and a "small corporation"? rofl.. .We will just end this discussion right hereYou are correct. I don't understand large corporations. I do own a small corporation and understand that very well. Honestly, I have terrible spelling as do most people with dyslexia.
Perhaps use punctuation before correcting anyone's spelling. Lol
All good brother, GO HAWKS!
And I'm a Seattle native/local simpleton.
punctuation? You... cannot be serious.... please elaborate "English" teacherYou are correct. I don't understand large corporations. I do own a small corporation and understand that very well. Honestly, I have terrible spelling as do most people with dyslexia.
Perhaps use punctuation before correcting anyone's spelling. Lol
All good brother, GO HAWKS!
And I'm a Seattle native/local simpleton.
From someone who corrects spelling calls me an English teacher?punctuation? You... cannot be serious.... please elaborate "English" teacher
He’s a tough guy to get along withFrom someone who corrects spelling calls me an English teacher?
Okay. This will be my last response. The Seahawks won and it's a happy night.
To answer your question a sentence ends with punctuation. A question ends with a question mark "?". A sentence ends in a period ".". So saying "please elaborate "English" teacher"
It should include a period. The end of your sentence should look like this... please elaborate "English" teacher.
You are welcome.
And I thought this thread would be about Geno lol. Anyone checked on him lately?
I am not a big KK fan but he did well. Congrats to him. Many people seem to want an OC more suited to a pass heavy super star QB offense. I don't see that happening. We can be the slightly boring on offense Super Bowl winning Seahawks.
I forgot about him….. haha jkAnd I thought this thread would be about Geno lol. Anyone checked on him lately?
I am not a big KK fan but he did well. Congrats to him. Many people seem to want an OC more suited to a pass heavy super star QB offense. I don't see that happening. We can be the slightly boring on offense Super Bowl winning Seahawks.
Yea, let’s see how well this ages.For taking our weak links. Bye Kubiak….
I see it differently. First of all we’re not fixing an unbroken system. Kubiak is leaving. It’s not broken it’s gone. Second it’s not kubiaks system. It’s mikes. No I don’t know who they should hire. But it won’t be klint. Third, Kubiak didn’t own the restaurant, he was a cook. We will find another cook. We will teach him this culture, we will teach him how to be patient and committed to the run. I am excited to see what’s next. Kubiak is meh and he should have stayed.Yea, let’s see how well this ages.
Just curious, who do you like to replace him?
Sam will be our QB, are you excited about the thought of him learning a new offense?
Are you concerned about the chemistry Sam and the new guy will have?
I see way more downside to losing Kubiak than I see upside bringing in a new guy.
Our system wasn’t broken, and IMO you don’t try fixing something that isn’t.
Not only wasn’t it broken, it was working pretty darn well.
Guess I’m suggesting “be careful what you wish for “.
Sure it’s not like we have a choice, but considering we were a top 10 offense that’s not too shabby, and it might be tougher to repeat than you think.
We were a top 10 offense and we never even reached our potential… we are gonna be deadly for a long timeYea, let’s see how well this ages.
Just curious, who do you like to replace him?
Sam will be our QB, are you excited about the thought of him learning a new offense?
Are you concerned about the chemistry Sam and the new guy will have?
I see way more downside to losing Kubiak than I see upside bringing in a new guy.
Our system wasn’t broken, and IMO you don’t try fixing something that isn’t.
Not only wasn’t it broken, it was working pretty darn well.
Guess I’m suggesting “be careful what you wish for “.
Sure it’s not like we have a choice, but considering we were a top 10 offense that’s not too shabby, and it might be tougher to repeat than you think.
Appreciate your enthusiasm.We were a top 10 offense and we never even reached our potential… we are gonna be deadly for a long time
Meh he got pressured all game long. He had a couple I bet he would love to have back but you can say that about every QB in almost every game. Overall he played pretty well and when we couldn't run in the second half he was much better. I think he was 11-14 in the second half?I agree I have seen some things from Sam I wish were better
I know what your response was. That’s why I’m enthusiastic. But I just think the source is Mike and the next guy is gonna be a step up, againAppreciate your enthusiasm.
My response was based off your OP
Weak link/Kubiak
Top 10 offense and top Defense won us the SB
ANY major change is a gamble, and I’m not excited about making any even those that are forced.
Team Chemistry is a major factor, Chemistry is about balance, interactions, and reactions.
Hopefully your line of thinking works out, and my concerns are a moot point