As much as I love your name(I am a huge Sonics fan from back in the day an it comes dangerously close to many of my passwords) I couldn't disagree more. DK was a physical specimen who just couldn't seem to put those physical tools to effect on the field. If he caught the ball with a path to the end zone then he was great...but he didn't high point the ball, box out, make people miss or was especially hard to tackle. That isn't worth being paid top 3 WR $$ in the league. I wouldn't be surprised if Kupp ends up with better numbers than DK this year. The Darnold/Geno debate is a good one, only time will tell. If Geno is really getting $45 mil per year than I gotta say that Darnold at over $10 mil per year less and 7 years younger is the better option. One big difference between the 2 is completion %. Geno was the master of accurate, short passes and actually deep dimes as well. He throws a great ball. Darnold let the league in passes that were 20+ yards in the air but you have to factor that he had JJ at the end of alot of those passes. Of course Geno's % would be better. The difference between their completion % last year equated to just a bit over 1 more pass completed per game...