SalishHawkFan
New member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 5,872
- Reaction score
- 0
SacHawk2.0":2y7kutjj said:Hopefully we beat SF 49-0 both times. You know, to honor them.
Nah, let's go with 2 because they end up not making the playoffs.kearly":1lnu39kk said:SacHawk2.0":1lnu39kk said:Hopefully we beat SF 49-0 both times. You know, to honor them.
Make it three times.
kearly":3a7534gx said:I'd be happy to see SF in the playoffs if it means we get to crush their championship dreams in it.
Hawks46":1w46q5vr said:It's funny how this board rankes Sherman so much higher than Browner, and many people state Browner is the most expendable of our secondary, and he goes and makes 2 top 10 lists. Maybe I"m reading it wrong, but he looked damn good in YAC in the first chart, then didn't make the top 10 in the YAC chart.
I've watched Browner just maul people and take them out of a game. It's nice to know he's damn good when teams actually get a chance to throw at him as well. No, I'm not saying Browner is better than Sherm, but he's definately under appreciated on this board.
I also second the nightmare that is our starting 3 CB's. Good grief, when we bring the Nickle CB in, teams will pretty much have to throw the bubble screen out of their playbook.
Blitzer88":2wqs1hm4 said:Those are some nice numbers. Lets just hope they translate onto the field again this year. Secondary has to be dominant for us again this year.
CANHawk":kxr8gr3z said:Browner has his weaknesses out there against the real burners (as was exposed by Mike Wallace a few years back),
SalishHawkFan":g23a9rum said:I can't remember who it was, but Browner really impressed me with his speed when he ran down a guy from behind and brought him down inside the five. Saved the touchdown on that play and it was against someone pretty darned fast. Anyone remember who that was?