HawksNation
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2023
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 163
Pete and Greg Olsen, these two were always next to each other. Jokes aside, Olsen may be our trump card to recruit these young QB. Olsen has a great track record, from college to pro.The QB question is about to start in full force…
What message do you think the Seahawks are sending with these QB Selfies??
View attachment 58451View attachment 58452View attachment 58453
Totally. Maybe they'd take Anderson if he's there, but I honestly think they're as likely to trade up as trade down for a QB.The way they structured Geno's contract is more of a smokescreen. PC and JS are having fun like they did with DK, while getting a ton of traction for Seahawks social media.
Hard to imagine them passing on any of the top 4 QBs at #5.
What? Will Anderson and 2 Hookers!IF all 4 QB's are off the board before we pick at 5, guess what? That means Will Anderson is ours and it's Hooker time in round 2. Win-win.
Do I think that they would take all four? No, I don't think that's the case at all.The way they structured Geno's contract is more of a smokescreen. PC and JS are having fun like they did with DK, while getting a ton of traction for Seahawks social media.
Hard to imagine them passing on any of the top 4 QBs at #5.
Levis is said to be the perfect fit for the offense the Seahawks run, sky's the limit for AR15, and passing on Stroud/Young isn't going to happen.Do I think that they would take all four? No, I don't think that's the case at all.
It's highly likely that they will identify one or two guys that they really like out of the 4. But I don't necessarily subscribe to the theory of having to take a QB. Unless the guy you want is available.
Fwiw the rumor was they "loved" Bryce Young. Maybe they also fall in love with Richardson. But there's a chance that he could be gone as well. Which would then shift their focus.
This reads like it came directly from Rob Staton lol.Levis is said to be the perfect fit for the offense the Seahawks run, sky's the limit for AR15, and passing on Stroud/Young isn't going to happen.
Hard to imagine them not taking one of them at #5, whichever one falls.
Jim Nagy and JT O'Sullivan said this about Levis as well. Hence "Levis is said to" by people smarter than you, I or anybody on this forum. You disagree with them that Levis isn't a fit when he played that offense at Kentucky?This reads like it came directly from Rob Staton lol.
Levis is far from the perfect prospect. Same goes for AR. Call me a skeptic.
I honestly think that this whole twitter pic thing is just a joke. A troll job that the social media team is running with.
I'm well aware of Levis' background story. That wasn't the point of my response. I guess I should have clarified.Jim Nagy and JT O'Sullivan said this about Levis as well. Hence "Levis is said to" by people smarter than you, I or anybody on this forum. You disagree with them that Levis isn't a fit when he played that offense at Kentucky?
Sorry you took it literally that Levis is a perfect prospect.
Not quite. The Seahawks want the rest of the league to think they love all of these QBs so someone trades with AZ to jump ahead of us. THAT way we get Anderson.Here's a theory: The Hawks want Will Anderson. They are trying to make Arizona think they love all 4 of these QB's. Arizona, while they like Anderson too, might be considering trading their pick to a QB-needy team just because they have so many holes to fill. Thinking they are blocking Seattle from getting one of the big 4 QB's might be just the thing that makes them pull the trigger on such a trade.
Your point was understood, maybe I should clarify. With Levis said to be a good fit for the offense (having played in it his entire time at Kentucky) and a lot of upside, AR15 having so much potential (can sit and learn behind Geno), and Stroud/Young being as great as they are, it's hard to see them passing up any of them. They won't "have to take one", they'll love to take one. They simply don't get the opportunity to draft these guys ever like Carroll has stated.I guess I should have clarified.