ImTheScientist
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,724
- Reaction score
- 63
Just think about that as you post your fire "____" posts.
Yet our offense still was inconsistent on a quarter by quarter basis, on a game by game basis, and under-performed the first half of the season. Questionable decision making on the offenses part cost us a Superbowl win. By and large we've been living, or dying with Russell's ability to improvise, which is no way to run an offense.ImTheScientist":2wmg592o said:Just think about that as you post your fire "____" posts.
Spin Doctor":31l08rsn said:Yet our offense still was inconsistent on a quarter by quarter basis, on a game by game basis, and under-performed the first half of the season. Questionable decision making on the offenses part cost us a Superbowl win. By and large we've been living, or dying with Russell's ability to improvise, which is no way to run an offense.ImTheScientist":31l08rsn said:Just think about that as you post your fire "____" posts.
Our offense has always been slow to adjust to what the defense is doing, and straight up non-existent until the second half of the game. We trade for a TE that is bad at blocking, but a phenominal receiving talent and we use him as an inline blocker? Are you kidding me? This is the definition of insanity, doing the same damn thing and expecting different results.
Spin Doctor":1fkehodu said:Yet our offense still was inconsistent on a quarter by quarter basis, on a game by game basis, and under-performed the first half of the season. Questionable decision making on the offenses part cost us a Superbowl win. By and large we've been living, or dying with Russell's ability to improvise, which is no way to run an offense.ImTheScientist":1fkehodu said:Just think about that as you post your fire "____" posts.
Our offense has always been slow to adjust to what the defense is doing, and straight up non-existent until the second half of the game. We trade for a TE that is bad at blocking, but a phenominal receiving talent and we use him as an inline blocker? Are you kidding me? This is the definition of insanity, doing the same damn thing and expecting different results.
Hawks46":90q9kfeb said:Spin Doctor":90q9kfeb said:Yet our offense still was inconsistent on a quarter by quarter basis, on a game by game basis, and under-performed the first half of the season. Questionable decision making on the offenses part cost us a Superbowl win. By and large we've been living, or dying with Russell's ability to improvise, which is no way to run an offense.ImTheScientist":90q9kfeb said:Just think about that as you post your fire "____" posts.
Our offense has always been slow to adjust to what the defense is doing, and straight up non-existent until the second half of the game. We trade for a TE that is bad at blocking, but a phenominal receiving talent and we use him as an inline blocker? Are you kidding me? This is the definition of insanity, doing the same damn thing and expecting different results.
Good post. If you need proof, just look how bad our offense looked today without Russ being able to improvise and PICK UP YARDS WITH HIS LEGS. I thought about that after the game and it's scary how much we depend on Wilson scrambling for yards and 1st downs.
Also, love the whole "last year" thing. Last year isn't going to get us wins this year. Especially when we don't use the successful game plans from last year.
POTYSpin Doctor":2eqvebnd said:Yet our offense still was inconsistent on a quarter by quarter basis, on a game by game basis, and under-performed the first half of the season. Questionable decision making on the offenses part cost us a Superbowl win. By and large we've been living, or dying with Russell's ability to improvise, which is no way to run an offense.ImTheScientist":2eqvebnd said:Just think about that as you post your fire "____" posts.
Our offense has always been slow to adjust to what the defense is doing, and straight up non-existent until the second half of the game. We trade for a TE that is bad at blocking, but a phenominal receiving talent and we use him as an inline blocker? Are you kidding me? This is the definition of insanity, doing the same damn thing and expecting different results.
ImTheScientist":2jlag4l1 said:Just think about that as you post your fire "____" posts.
Siouxhawk":2bdxw84n said:Exactly. Fans are so fickle and obnoxiously intolerant in many of these posts. The reputation of our offensive coordinator speaks for itself -- 2 Super Bowl appearances in the last 3 years and an offense that put 32 points on the board per game in the final 8 last season. These fans also must not be paying attention to how the Hawks put more of an emphasis on finishing strong, working out the kinks early and then pouncing on their prey in the second half of the season. It's a recipe that's worked well before, so I'm solidly in support of our entire coaching staff.
That's how this works. OP makes a post and then everyone adds their two cents. New to this format?seahawkfreak":3hxnw9j9 said:Siouxhawk":3hxnw9j9 said:Exactly. Fans are so fickle and obnoxiously intolerant in many of these posts. The reputation of our offensive coordinator speaks for itself -- 2 Super Bowl appearances in the last 3 years and an offense that put 32 points on the board per game in the final 8 last season. These fans also must not be paying attention to how the Hawks put more of an emphasis on finishing strong, working out the kinks early and then pouncing on their prey in the second half of the season. It's a recipe that's worked well before, so I'm solidly in support of our entire coaching staff.
Way to only read the first post then reply.
RussB":2hf1k74s said:They did that in spite of bevell. If they had a truly good OC they could be the #1 offense not even joking. Hes holding the team back, the defense is great like it always has been. The offense is just terrible.