Largent80
New member
Lane is a very obvious signing to me. Simon needs to be forgotten, the rest are unproven. Kearse blocks like an old lady. But at times, balls out of his gourd.
Hawks46":250y7ybz said:kearly":250y7ybz said:This is opinion by Sando, not actual reporting.
I'm not sure how one would define "priority" anyway. If any of these guys were priorities they would have been signed to extensions last offseason. Or during the regular season, in the case of Rubin.
Wait, Rubin isn't a Free Agent ? I must've missed his extension.
Sgt. Largent":6hcpidhm said:Not sure why this is a knock on Kearse or Lane.
We have more pressing priorities to take care of first before even discussing either of them.
- Gonna pay Bennett more?
- Gonna re-work Doug's deal?
- Both Rubin and Mebane are free agents
- How bout Sweezy?
- What to do with Kam?
- Does Lynch need to be cut and we have to eat 5M in signing bonus? Retiring?
I think as we did with guys like Tate, Breno and Carp.................you let Lane and Kearse test the FA market and then see where it goes from there.
Largent80":3evv0dlh said:Sgt. Largent":3evv0dlh said:Not sure why this is a knock on Kearse or Lane.
We have more pressing priorities to take care of first before even discussing either of them.
- Gonna pay Bennett more?
- Gonna re-work Doug's deal?
- Both Rubin and Mebane are free agents
- How bout Sweezy?
- What to do with Kam?
- Does Lynch need to be cut and we have to eat 5M in signing bonus? Retiring?
I think as we did with guys like Tate, Breno and Carp.................you let Lane and Kearse test the FA market and then see where it goes from there.
Over thinking it.
Frankie says relax
Sgt. Largent":1u3nzgtq said:Largent80":1u3nzgtq said:Sgt. Largent":1u3nzgtq said:Not sure why this is a knock on Kearse or Lane.
We have more pressing priorities to take care of first before even discussing either of them.
- Gonna pay Bennett more?
- Gonna re-work Doug's deal?
- Both Rubin and Mebane are free agents
- How bout Sweezy?
- What to do with Kam?
- Does Lynch need to be cut and we have to eat 5M in signing bonus? Retiring?
I think as we did with guys like Tate, Breno and Carp.................you let Lane and Kearse test the FA market and then see where it goes from there.
Over thinking it.
Frankie says relax
I don't know what you mean, but you go on with your bad self.
Saying we have more pressing priorities than Kearse and Lane is fact, not over thinking.
Largent80":2j5a2myh said:You listed 3 Hawks with contracts signed through the next year. Lynch is an easy cut. There's 4 players you listed that the Hawks don't have to deal with.
I like both guys, but I'm ok losing Kearse. Lane is the one I think we need to keep.Aros":1mwk8xc9 said:"Because Russell Wilson showed this season that No. 1 he can produce at a high level without an established running back, and No. 2 even without Jimmy Graham, Doug Baldwin and Tyler Lockett look like real keepers, real good players, guys you can feature in the offense, I don't think you want to extend yourself for Jermaine Kearse. If he wants to be there and the price is right, great. But don't pay a premium at those two positions where I think they're just going to be fine."
http://mynorthwest.com/292/2899390/ESPN ... priorities