Rumor - Jadeveon Clowney to Seahawks?

McGruff

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
5,424
Reaction score
174
Location
Tri-Cities, WA
Hawkpower":1zxcixn6 said:
McGruff":1zxcixn6 said:
Did anyone call Clowney a bust?


Yes. 6th post of this thread :"Not happening. Not worth the risk. Agree as above an injury bust like Luck"

I personally am not sure how I feel about the possibilty. I see both sides....but man D-line is so important and we are so thin there right now. Sure is tempting...even if the rationale against it is legit in many ways.

I missed that. Thanks.

It's a profound error to call Clowney a bust. However, I do think it is true that his college rep and high draft status elevate his reputation among fans beyond his professional production.

He is not as good as people think he is. The primary confidence I have in saying that is that when the Chiefs could have had Clowney, they choose Clark instead
 

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
19,785
Reaction score
6,539
Location
North of the Wall
Hawkpower":mat4bfbu said:
McGruff":mat4bfbu said:
Did anyone call Clowney a bust?


Yes. 6th post of this thread :"Not happening. Not worth the risk. Agree as above an injury bust like Luck"

I personally am not sure how I feel about the possibilty. I see both sides....but man D-line is so important and we are so thin there right now. Sure is tempting...even if the rationale against it is legit in many ways.
Injury bust and a plain out bust are different...he cant stay healthy..so an injury bust just like Nick Bosa is going to be. Some guys cant take the wear and tear.
 

xray

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
9,562
Reaction score
1,639
Location
AZ
If that where to happen ; then why ? If the Hawks were to somehow sign Clowney ; would it be for long term ? Short term ? They should just admit that they should of kept Clark . Clarks's revenge will be that he plays for a SB contender .
 

rcaido

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
2,394
Reaction score
658
1-year deals are the way to go as our young talents develope. Then use them as comp picks. Repeat another year or two and hopefully our young talents pan out.
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,402
Reaction score
1,435
Location
Taipei
Trading Clark wasn't dumb no matter what even if they do trade for Clowney or someone else.

They turned that trade into 11 picks. It already was a huge success.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
6,169
Reaction score
2,276
oldhawkfan":2tam0db0 said:
A built in advantage the Seahawks have is Duane Brown. He was Clowneys teammate and went against him in practice. He would be the one that could accurately compare Clooney to Clark.

I don't see why Duane Brown would have any special knowledge of the subject.
Anyone can compare Clooney to Clark. Just look on YouTube for yourself, links below.
I know OldHawkFan is old, and the 60's had great performers, but it might just be time for him to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 70's.

[youtube]mriXncI96lw[/youtube]
[youtube]Zx06XNfDvk0[/youtube]
 

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,298
Reaction score
2,013
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Smellyman":3prenyfa said:
Trading Clark wasn't dumb no matter what even if they do trade for Clowney or someone else.

They turned that trade into 11 picks. It already was a huge success.

Not to mention, it left us with the cap space to extend Russell Wilson, Bobby Wagner, and Jarran Reed. Clark was the only feasible Big Money player that we could trade for so much draft capital.

Neither Wagner nor Reed would have brought that much. That trade was a win, win,win.

And you don't trade away 2020 draft capital to rent a player that might have some injury issues. No, you save that draft capital,and use it to get an elite, long-term pass rusher in the 2020 draft.

Such as:
Chase Young, Derrick Brown, AJ Epenesa, or Raekwon Davis

How do you trade up for one of those guys if you trade away draft capital?

And comp picks are not guaranteed. Even if you get a comp pick, you can't use it until 2021. They say that a pick received a year early loses a round of value. ie: A 2021 3rd round draft pick received in 2020 only has 4th round value. Remember, a 3rd round comp pick comes at the very end of the 3rd round, which is pick 97 or later. Basically, a 4th round pick.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
3,908
Location
Kennewick, WA
Smellyman":18cl7wmm said:
Trading Clark wasn't dumb no matter what even if they do trade for Clowney or someone else.

They turned that trade into 11 picks. It already was a huge success.

ivotuk":18cl7wmm said:
Not to mention, it left us with the cap space to extend Russell Wilson, Bobby Wagner, and Jarran Reed. Clark was the only feasible Big Money player that we could trade for so much draft capital.

Neither Wagner nor Reed would have brought that much. That trade was a win, win,win.

Agreed.

ivotuk":18cl7wmm said:
And you don't trade away 2020 draft capital to rent a player that might have some injury issues. No, you save that draft capital,and use it to get an elite, long-term pass rusher in the 2020 draft.

We currently have 12 picks in the 2020 draft, which has to be a record for us. It includes 2-#2's, 2-#3's, and 2-#4's. We're not going to mortgage our future by burning a 3rd day pick. I personally don't advocate giving up a #1 on a one year rental, but a 3rd plus a player is palatable, especially if we could get some performance strings attached. And who knows, it might not turn out to be a one-year rental.

It's true that there's no signs of activity coming out of the Texans' corner and that we're just speculating, but word is that negotiations with Clowney aren't going well. The Texans view themselves as a contender and assumedly don't want a Le'Veon Bell-type of detraction to deal with. It is plausible to think that they could at some point decide to cut bait.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,769
Reaction score
2,468
Location
Spokane
olyfan63":1n90ac0t said:
oldhawkfan":1n90ac0t said:
A built in advantage the Seahawks have is Duane Brown. He was Clowneys teammate and went against him in practice. He would be the one that could accurately compare Clooney to Clark.

I don't see why Duane Brown would have any special knowledge of the subject.
Anyone can compare Clooney to Clark. Just look on YouTube for yourself, links below.
I know OldHawkFan is old, and the 60's had great performers, but it might just be time for him to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 70's.

[youtube]mriXncI96lw[/youtube]
[youtube]Zx06XNfDvk0[/youtube]


Careful. I may have to take you out to the woodshed. My point about Duane Brown is that he has an insight to Clowney that can’t be obtained from YouTube, instagram, Snapchat or anything else you can find on the google machine. He knows the guy. He knows his work habits in both practice and games. He knows his personality. He has gone against him on a daily basis in practice. He knows what kind of teammate he is. I guarantee you if John and Pete are even considering the prospect of trading for him they have had conversations with Brown. It’s called due diligence.
 

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,478
Reaction score
1,534
The only issue with trading for Clowney now, is that we can't negotiate a new contract. Trading for a guy with no guarantee he's going to be back next year, is a big risk. Otherwise, he would be a great get and fit for our hawks.
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,285
Reaction score
2,404
RiverDog":247irm5r said:
We currently have 12 picks in the 2020 draft, which has to be a record for us. It includes 2-#2's, 2-#3's, and 2-#4's.
I currently have us at 10 picks.

And I agree with your statement that we have 2-#2s, 2-#3s and 2-#4s but add our 1st rounder to get to 7 total and what we have left is our 5th (for 8 total) and then we have a 6th comp pick for losing Shamar Stephen and lastly a 7th comp pick for losing Brett Hundley. So that makes 10 total. (The comp picks are projections by overthecap.com.)

We previously traded our 6th round pick in 2020 to Jacksonville for the rights to draft John Ursua in 2019, and we traded our 7th round pick in 2020 to New England for TE Jacob Hollister, which I understand is a conditional pick with unspecified conditions so that one is a bit uncertain at this time.
 

Ad Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
3,326
Reaction score
568
onanygivensunday":1h1g57ri said:
RiverDog":1h1g57ri said:
We currently have 12 picks in the 2020 draft, which has to be a record for us. It includes 2-#2's, 2-#3's, and 2-#4's.
I currently have us at 10 picks.

And I agree with your statement that we have 2-#2s, 2-#3s and 2-#4s but add our 1st rounder to get to 7 total and what we have left is our 5th (for 8 total) and then we have a 6th comp pick for losing Shamar Stephen and lastly a 7th comp pick for losing Brett Hundley. So that makes 10 total. (The comp picks are projections by overthecap.com.)

We previously traded our 6th round pick in 2020 to Jacksonville for the rights to draft John Ursua in 2019, and we traded our 7th round pick in 2020 to New England for TE Jacob Hollister, which I understand is a conditional pick with unspecified conditions so that one is a bit uncertain at this time.

How many total picks will this become by the time JS is done wheeling and dealing, do you suppose?
 

Chawker

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
5,491
Reaction score
1,457
Location
corner of 30th & plum
I've heard that the Seahawks will more then likly make a trade in the comming weeks, but it is more unlikly NOT Clowney.


In competition for a rost spot DB Kalan Reed today.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
6,169
Reaction score
2,276
oldhawkfan":1u4d2xd1 said:
olyfan63":1u4d2xd1 said:
oldhawkfan":1u4d2xd1 said:
A built in advantage the Seahawks have is Duane Brown. He was Clowneys teammate and went against him in practice. He would be the one that could accurately compare Clooney to Clark.

I don't see why Duane Brown would have any special knowledge of the subject.
Anyone can compare Clooney to Clark. Just look on YouTube for yourself, links below.
I know OldHawkFan is old, and the 60's had great performers, but it might just be time for him to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 70's.

<videos snipped>

Careful. I may have to take you out to the woodshed. My point about Duane Brown is that he has an insight to Clowney that can’t be obtained from YouTube, instagram, Snapchat or anything else you can find on the google machine. He knows the guy. He knows his work habits in both practice and games. He knows his personality. He has gone against him on a daily basis in practice. He knows what kind of teammate he is. I guarantee you if John and Pete are even considering the prospect of trading for him they have had conversations with Brown. It’s called due diligence.

So you're claiming now that while writing about Jadaveon Clowney that your mind wandered to fantasies of Amal Clooney, not Rosemary Clooney, so you're really not that old and feeble, just distractable? Behind the woodshed, instead of swinging for my ass and missing, you'd get distracted and give me a thanking? Dammit, where the hell did I put those ADD meds anyway?

Yeah, that Duane Brown dude has done pretty well for us, and as you point out is in position to know Clowney pretty well and how he'd fit in the Seahawks environment. In Pete and John's shoes I'd certainly check that reference before making the rental.
 
OP
OP
O

OahuHawkFan

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
183
Reaction score
2
Location
Portland, OR
oldhawkfan":2rlgvkte said:
olyfan63":2rlgvkte said:
oldhawkfan":2rlgvkte said:
A built in advantage the Seahawks have is Duane Brown. He was Clowneys teammate and went against him in practice. He would be the one that could accurately compare Clooney to Clark.

I don't see why Duane Brown would have any special knowledge of the subject.
Anyone can compare Clooney to Clark. Just look on YouTube for yourself, links below.
I know OldHawkFan is old, and the 60's had great performers, but it might just be time for him to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 70's.

[youtube]mriXncI96lw[/youtube]
[youtube]Zx06XNfDvk0[/youtube]


Careful. I may have to take you out to the woodshed. My point about Duane Brown is that he has an insight to Clowney that can’t be obtained from YouTube, instagram, Snapchat or anything else you can find on the google machine. He knows the guy. He knows his work habits in both practice and games. He knows his personality. He has gone against him on a daily basis in practice. He knows what kind of teammate he is. I guarantee you if John and Pete are even considering the prospect of trading for him they have had conversations with Brown. It’s called due diligence.

While this sounds logical. I'm not sure if it works that way commonly. I think for certain team leaders (for example: Russel Wilson, Bobby Wagner), I could see the GM or Coach somewhat informally asking a player for their feedback.

But I could also see this as a bit of a conflict of interest between the player and the NFL Players Union. Sometimes, things get convoluted like that. I'd guess the GM / Coach need to tread more carefully than you might expect.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,769
Reaction score
2,468
Location
Spokane
olyfan63":9nehqk6h said:
oldhawkfan":9nehqk6h said:
olyfan63":9nehqk6h said:
oldhawkfan":9nehqk6h said:
A built in advantage the Seahawks have is Duane Brown. He was Clowneys teammate and went against him in practice. He would be the one that could accurately compare Clooney to Clark.

I don't see why Duane Brown would have any special knowledge of the subject.
Anyone can compare Clooney to Clark. Just look on YouTube for yourself, links below.
I know OldHawkFan is old, and the 60's had great performers, but it might just be time for him to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 70's.

<videos snipped>

Careful. I may have to take you out to the woodshed. My point about Duane Brown is that he has an insight to Clowney that can’t be obtained from YouTube, instagram, Snapchat or anything else you can find on the google machine. He knows the guy. He knows his work habits in both practice and games. He knows his personality. He has gone against him on a daily basis in practice. He knows what kind of teammate he is. I guarantee you if John and Pete are even considering the prospect of trading for him they have had conversations with Brown. It’s called due diligence.

So you're claiming now that while writing about Jadaveon Clowney that your mind wandered to fantasies of Amal Clooney, not Rosemary Clooney, so you're really not that old and feeble, just distractable? Behind the woodshed, instead of swinging for my ass and missing, you'd get distracted and give me a thanking? Dammit, where the hell did I put those ADD meds anyway?

Yeah, that Duane Brown dude has done pretty well for us, and as you point out is in position to know Clowney pretty well and how he'd fit in the Seahawks environment. In Pete and John's shoes I'd certainly check that reference before making the rental.


The Clooney part came from autocorrect. :roll:
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,769
Reaction score
2,468
Location
Spokane
OahuHawkFan":10ck8mq0 said:
oldhawkfan":10ck8mq0 said:
olyfan63":10ck8mq0 said:
oldhawkfan":10ck8mq0 said:
A built in advantage the Seahawks have is Duane Brown. He was Clowneys teammate and went against him in practice. He would be the one that could accurately compare Clooney to Clark.

I don't see why Duane Brown would have any special knowledge of the subject.
Anyone can compare Clooney to Clark. Just look on YouTube for yourself, links below.
I know OldHawkFan is old, and the 60's had great performers, but it might just be time for him to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 70's.

[youtube]mriXncI96lw[/youtube]
[youtube]Zx06XNfDvk0[/youtube]


Careful. I may have to take you out to the woodshed. My point about Duane Brown is that he has an insight to Clowney that can’t be obtained from YouTube, instagram, Snapchat or anything else you can find on the google machine. He knows the guy. He knows his work habits in both practice and games. He knows his personality. He has gone against him on a daily basis in practice. He knows what kind of teammate he is. I guarantee you if John and Pete are even considering the prospect of trading for him they have had conversations with Brown. It’s called due diligence.

While this sounds logical. I'm not sure if it works that way commonly. I think for certain team leaders (for example: Russel Wilson, Bobby Wagner), I could see the GM or Coach somewhat informally asking a player for their feedback.

But I could also see this as a bit of a conflict of interest between the player and the NFL Players Union. Sometimes, things get convoluted like that. I'd guess the GM / Coach need to tread more carefully than you might expect.


I don’t see how that would be a conflict of interest. I’m sure these types of conversations happen all the time between management and players. It happens in the business world all the time. No difference than a reference. I have no doubt that Johnand/or Pete have asked Brown what he thinks of Clowney as a player and teammate. Not that hard to imagine.
 

kf3339

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
3,708
Reaction score
10
oldhawkfan":1yj0khi8 said:
OahuHawkFan":1yj0khi8 said:
oldhawkfan":1yj0khi8 said:
olyfan63":1yj0khi8 said:
I don't see why Duane Brown would have any special knowledge of the subject.
Anyone can compare Clooney to Clark. Just look on YouTube for yourself, links below.
I know OldHawkFan is old, and the 60's had great performers, but it might just be time for him to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 70's.

[youtube]mriXncI96lw[/youtube]
[youtube]Zx06XNfDvk0[/youtube]


Careful. I may have to take you out to the woodshed. My point about Duane Brown is that he has an insight to Clowney that can’t be obtained from YouTube, instagram, Snapchat or anything else you can find on the google machine. He knows the guy. He knows his work habits in both practice and games. He knows his personality. He has gone against him on a daily basis in practice. He knows what kind of teammate he is. I guarantee you if John and Pete are even considering the prospect of trading for him they have had conversations with Brown. It’s called due diligence.

While this sounds logical. I'm not sure if it works that way commonly. I think for certain team leaders (for example: Russel Wilson, Bobby Wagner), I could see the GM or Coach somewhat informally asking a player for their feedback.

But I could also see this as a bit of a conflict of interest between the player and the NFL Players Union. Sometimes, things get convoluted like that. I'd guess the GM / Coach need to tread more carefully than you might expect.


I don’t see how that would be a conflict of interest. I’m sure these types of conversations happen all the time between management and players. It happens in the business world all the time. No difference than a reference. I have no doubt that Johnand/or Pete have asked Brown what he thinks of Clowney as a player and teammate. Not that hard to imagine.

^This.

That would not even be closely considered a conflict of interest.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
3,908
Location
Kennewick, WA
onanygivensunday":2kbzgzmx said:
RiverDog":2kbzgzmx said:
We currently have 12 picks in the 2020 draft, which has to be a record for us. It includes 2-#2's, 2-#3's, and 2-#4's.
I currently have us at 10 picks.

And I agree with your statement that we have 2-#2s, 2-#3s and 2-#4s but add our 1st rounder to get to 7 total and what we have left is our 5th (for 8 total) and then we have a 6th comp pick for losing Shamar Stephen and lastly a 7th comp pick for losing Brett Hundley. So that makes 10 total. (The comp picks are projections by overthecap.com.)

We previously traded our 6th round pick in 2020 to Jacksonville for the rights to draft John Ursua in 2019, and we traded our 7th round pick in 2020 to New England for TE Jacob Hollister, which I understand is a conditional pick with unspecified conditions so that one is a bit uncertain at this time.

Thanks for the correction. I just did a search and the info I found said we had 12.

But it doesn't change the nature of my point, which was that we have excess picks of which we could burn one or two and still not mortgage our future if we decided that we want to roll the dice on a player like Clowney.

And I agree with Chawker that a trade of some sort can be expected prior to the start of the regular season once our coaches can make a good determination as to which areas we're going to need some help at.
 
Top