- Joined
- Mar 20, 2022
- Messages
- 5,335
- Reaction score
- 6,956
Agree Sgt. Just satire…it’s hard for me see why people thought this was going to be a competitive year with our QB room.Because we're not fine at QB. Not even close.
It is what it is….
Agree Sgt. Just satire…it’s hard for me see why people thought this was going to be a competitive year with our QB room.Because we're not fine at QB. Not even close.
Poles made him a pretty good offer, and he rejected it. He has no professional agent. Poles has the money to franchise tag him, if he continues to demand more than Poles is willing to give him. As for now, the franchise tag seems to be the most likely scenario. Poles isn’t likely to trade him, unless Bears get a player of equal value in the trade.He's an excellent player, and we'd be lucky to have him. However, I'd be shocked if he could be had for THAT little, and I don't think I'd want to give what he will cost. It's just not worth it for an off-ball linebacker.
Pretty much the same.
I think he is a great player but I would prefer a great defensive lineman. We really need to pump up our defensive line.I heard yesterday Roquan Smith was unhappy with the Bears and I immidately thought about the Seahawks making a move and pairing him up with Brooks. Then I thought about the draft capital it would cost, as well as the new contract he would require. Then I saw an article from ESPN about the front runners to get him and they listed the Seahawks as the #1 team. It does make sense, given our defensive coaching ties to the Bears. The article states that 1 exec said he potentially could be had for a 3rd rounder. Why not send them a 3rd round pick and Cody Barton for him? The amount he's asking for on his new contract could be a deal breaker but that would be a scary and young LB core.
Article Here