Rapoport: Wilson's agent likely to end contract talks soon

Status
Not open for further replies.

iigakusei

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,856
Reaction score
1
Tical21":1f1dsjj7 said:
StoneCold":1f1dsjj7 said:
So, if you were the GM, you wouldn't offer him 22 apy and you wouldn't franchise him next year at 22 to 23 mil? You'd just let him go?

Yowza.

SC
The million dollar question........

Do you believe Russell Wilson can author Super Bowl victories with a less than elite supporting cast around him, particularly on defense?

Knowing what I know about his game, I would personally bet against it.

Therefore, we are left with no choice but to find another way to win those championships in my opinion.

Here is the thing though—when you talk about winning with a league average quarterback (as in a previous post), who are you talking about?

Most league average Qb's have a Cap hit of around 16 million don't they? Or are you talking about a Brian Hoyer, Josh McCown, Mark Sanchez type around a $5 million cap hit? So first you have to trade for a league average QB—good luck, draft a league average QB (easier said than done), or sign a free agent like Hoyer, Sanchez, etc.

Let's say we let Russell walk after three years....how do you want see it playing out? Do you honestly think we would be better off with KJ Wright, Doug Baldwin, Bobby Wagner and Brian Hoyer—or Russell Wilson and 3 rookies?
 

rideaducati

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
0
hawknation2015":153bqdi7 said:
rideaducati":153bqdi7 said:
Anyone see a bad Super Bowl winning QB? Look up the opposing QB and tell me where the mismatch was.

Super Bowl 27. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 28. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 29. Steve Young
Super Bowl 30. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 31. Brett Favre
Super Bowl 32. John Elway
Super Bowl 33. John Elway
Super Bowl 34. Kurt Warner
Super Bowl 35. Trent Dilfer
Super Bowl 36. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 37. Brad Johnson
Super Bowl 38. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 39. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 40. Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 41. Peyton Manning
Super Bowl 42. Eli Manning
Super Bowl 43: Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 44: Drew Brees
Super Bowl 45: Aaron Rogers
Super Bowl 46: Eli Manning
Super Bowl 47: Joe Flacco
Super Bowl 48: Russell Wilson

Trent Dilfer is about as pedestrian as it gets. Brad Johnson, Eli Manning, and Joe Flacco would all be considered extremely mediocre if they did not have Super Bowls on their resume.

Dilfer went against Kerry Collins. Brad Johnson...Rich Gannon. Flacco went against Keeporpick. There is a reason they won. Eli is the only guy that definitively beat a better QB.
 

StoneCold

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2013
Messages
3,085
Reaction score
267
Tical21":22j45vza said:
StoneCold":22j45vza said:
So, if you were the GM, you wouldn't offer him 22 apy and you wouldn't franchise him next year at 22 to 23 mil? You'd just let him go?

Yowza.

SC
The million dollar question........

Do you believe Russell Wilson can author Super Bowl victories with a less than elite supporting cast around him, particularly on defense?

Knowing what I know about his game, I would personally bet against it.

Therefore, we are left with no choice but to find another way to win those championships in my opinion.

I do think he can. I'd rather not try, but... Tough choices indeed. I truly don't think we've yet seen the best from RW.

SC
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,798
Reaction score
1,265
Location
Phoenix az
hawknation2015":2th7yoeo said:
Tical21":2th7yoeo said:
StoneCold":2th7yoeo said:
So, if you were the GM, you wouldn't offer him 22 apy and you wouldn't franchise him next year at 22 to 23 mil? You'd just let him go?

Yowza.

SC
The million dollar question........

Do you believe Russell Wilson can author Super Bowl victories with a less than elite supporting cast around him, particularly on defense?

Knowing what I know about his game, I would personally bet against it.

Therefore, we are left with no choice but to find another way to win those championships in my opinion.

That's not a criticism of Russell . . . no QB can lead their team to a Super Bowl consistently without great coaching and a great supporting cast. The best QB in the league hasn't been to a Super Bowl in four years.


Which is exactly why our FO has to handle this very carefully.

The Seahawks can't (and it seems like they won't) foolishly give in to unreasonable demands.

For that, I'm grateful. I trust that JS will do whats best for the franchise. Hopefully that means a reasonable deal with young Mr. Wilson.
 

rideaducati

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
0
Hawkpower":nx5j4ldv said:
rideaducati":nx5j4ldv said:
Tarvaris Jackson did so well with the ninth ranked defense. I want more of that. :sarcasm_off:

As far as defense vs. offense and winning championships, very few teams have won one without a top 5 unit on one side of the ball or the other. The worse the QB happens to be, the better defense needed to win a championship. I don't see a lot of bad QBs winning championships, but there are a lot of good defenses that have bad QBs NOT winning championships. Once in the Super Bowl, the better QB wins the majority of the time.

Anyone see a bad Super Bowl winning QB? Look up the opposing QB and tell me where the mismatch was.

Super Bowl 27. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 28. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 29. Steve Young
Super Bowl 30. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 31. Brett Favre
Super Bowl 32. John Elway
Super Bowl 33. John Elway
Super Bowl 34. Kurt Warner
Super Bowl 35. Trent Dilfer
Super Bowl 36. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 37. Brad Johnson
Super Bowl 38. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 39. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 40. Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 41. Peyton Manning
Super Bowl 42. Eli Manning
Super Bowl 43: Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 44: Drew Brees
Super Bowl 45: Aaron Rogers
Super Bowl 46: Eli Manning
Super Bowl 47: Joe Flacco
Super Bowl 48: Russell Wilson


This post is fine if we are debating Russell Wilson OR having a terrible QB.

I haven't seen that proposal being brought to the table yet, forgive me if I am wrong.

I don't see many non horrible QBs available in free agency and Tarvaris Jackson is documented horrible. Letting Russell go leaves the Seahawks with a horrible QB by default.
 
OP
OP
hawknation2015

hawknation2015

New member
Joined
Dec 31, 2014
Messages
5,439
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, Washington
rideaducati":12tmahfe said:
hawknation2015":12tmahfe said:
rideaducati":12tmahfe said:
Anyone see a bad Super Bowl winning QB? Look up the opposing QB and tell me where the mismatch was.

Super Bowl 27. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 28. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 29. Steve Young
Super Bowl 30. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 31. Brett Favre
Super Bowl 32. John Elway
Super Bowl 33. John Elway
Super Bowl 34. Kurt Warner
Super Bowl 35. Trent Dilfer
Super Bowl 36. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 37. Brad Johnson
Super Bowl 38. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 39. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 40. Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 41. Peyton Manning
Super Bowl 42. Eli Manning
Super Bowl 43: Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 44: Drew Brees
Super Bowl 45: Aaron Rogers
Super Bowl 46: Eli Manning
Super Bowl 47: Joe Flacco
Super Bowl 48: Russell Wilson

Trent Dilfer is about as pedestrian as it gets. Brad Johnson, Eli Manning, and Joe Flacco would all be considered extremely mediocre if they did not have Super Bowls on their resume.

Dilfer went against Kerry Collins. Brad Johnson...Rich Gannon. Flacco went against Keeporpick. There is a reason they won. Eli is the only guy that definitively beat a better QB.

That shows a lot of very poor QBs made it to the Super Bowl. Of course, you would rather have the better QB, but defense plays an equally important role. Rodgers was better than Wilson in the NFC Championship Game, but still lost. Brees is also better than Wilson, but who won last year's Divisional matchup between the two players? If not for one brain fart of a play call at the end of the Super Bowl, Wilson would have also bested Tom Brady.
 

Tical21

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
5,542
Reaction score
89
StoneCold":3befj027 said:
Tical21":3befj027 said:
StoneCold":3befj027 said:
So, if you were the GM, you wouldn't offer him 22 apy and you wouldn't franchise him next year at 22 to 23 mil? You'd just let him go?

Yowza.

SC
The million dollar question........

Do you believe Russell Wilson can author Super Bowl victories with a less than elite supporting cast around him, particularly on defense?

Knowing what I know about his game, I would personally bet against it.

Therefore, we are left with no choice but to find another way to win those championships in my opinion.

I do think he can. I'd rather not try, but... Tough choices indeed. I truly don't think we've yet seen the best from RW.

SC
That's fine, and I won't belittle anybody for having that opinion. It isn't like I don't think Russell Wilson is a very good quarterback. I'd rather have him than not, but gun to my head, I'm going to try another way.
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,798
Reaction score
1,265
Location
Phoenix az
rideaducati":y39qc8r9 said:
Hawkpower":y39qc8r9 said:
rideaducati":y39qc8r9 said:
Tarvaris Jackson did so well with the ninth ranked defense. I want more of that. :sarcasm_off:

As far as defense vs. offense and winning championships, very few teams have won one without a top 5 unit on one side of the ball or the other. The worse the QB happens to be, the better defense needed to win a championship. I don't see a lot of bad QBs winning championships, but there are a lot of good defenses that have bad QBs NOT winning championships. Once in the Super Bowl, the better QB wins the majority of the time.

Anyone see a bad Super Bowl winning QB? Look up the opposing QB and tell me where the mismatch was.

Super Bowl 27. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 28. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 29. Steve Young
Super Bowl 30. Troy Aikman
Super Bowl 31. Brett Favre
Super Bowl 32. John Elway
Super Bowl 33. John Elway
Super Bowl 34. Kurt Warner
Super Bowl 35. Trent Dilfer
Super Bowl 36. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 37. Brad Johnson
Super Bowl 38. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 39. Tom Brady
Super Bowl 40. Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 41. Peyton Manning
Super Bowl 42. Eli Manning
Super Bowl 43: Ben Roethlisberger
Super Bowl 44: Drew Brees
Super Bowl 45: Aaron Rogers
Super Bowl 46: Eli Manning
Super Bowl 47: Joe Flacco
Super Bowl 48: Russell Wilson


This post is fine if we are debating Russell Wilson OR having a terrible QB.

I haven't seen that proposal being brought to the table yet, forgive me if I am wrong.

I don't see many non horrible QBs available in free agency and Tarvaris Jackson is documented horrible. Letting Russell go leaves the Seahawks with a horrible QB by default.



Arguing that the only two options available to the hawks are Wilson...... or a terrible clipboard holder....... is silly

Lets pray it doesn't come to that, but I am sure if needed the FO will have a plan.
 

Northwest Seahawk

Active member
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Messages
1,836
Reaction score
14
kearly":ktidl2nz said:
rideaducati":ktidl2nz said:
I think Russell's camp is just huffing and puffing while there is no pressure on either side and he will sign before the season starts because it makes the most sense.

Wilson doesn't care about the risk. He's already got some money, he's got the insurance policy, and he's got a sense of God watching over his life. I don't think there is any bluff in Wilson's willingness to play this year at $1.5 million. He knows that once this year is played out, the FO will basically have nothing left as leverage. The longer this goes on, the more leverage Wilson has. If this strings out a few years, the leverage on Wilson's side will be enormous because Seattle will have to pay $29-30 million to franchise him 3 years from now.

If Wilson didn't have leverage, he would have signed a deal months ago.

JS is also a patient man at the table, but in this case, it is unwise to be. The circumstances dictate a sense of urgency from the FO, otherwise the deal Wilson eventually does sign down the road will dwarf the rumored Newton offer when it's all said and done.

I agree with rideaducati Wilson will sign before the season starts . The increased saber rattling from Wilson's camp is expected as the start of training camp gets closer, Simply not buying that Wilson is prepared to risk his entire career and play for 1.5 over a couple mill in a 22 plus million dollar negotiation .
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
1,797
seahawks08":1yc6xazk said:
scutterhawk":1yc6xazk said:
Hawkpower":1yc6xazk said:
Unless of course JS doesn't value RW in the way we think he should or might.

Wouldn't surprise me to find out that the FO has a line in the sand that they aren't willing to cross...now or ever.

Debating the intelligence of such a stance is worthy, but the FO beats to their own drum, they value defense and running games, they have A LOT of superstars on the roster....and RW has some question marks, valid ones.

Maybe RW has leverage in most cases....but here? I don't know.

JS was beside himself with exuberant anticipation about getting "RW" in the Draft, and Pete Carroll designating him as the starter over Flynn & Jackson in his Rookie outing, + the culminating results of all three Seasons with him at the helm, and you honestly believe that JS doesn't see his value?

This "Running Game" is most effective BECAUSE of the numbers that Russell Wilson has helped to add to it, it is NOT all Marshawn Lynch's doing.

The Seahawks Defense is the absolute best, bar none, with no arguments, but, they are not of and by themselves, the only reason for the culminated success.

A lot of the blame for the loss in Super Bowl 49, was laid on RW, but, most people seem to have amnesia when it comes to the Patriots coming back from a 10 point deficit (against the Seahawks vaunted Defense) to secure the win.

As I see it, there are too many here, that want to downplay Russell Wilson's value, to fit their end of the argument, and even going so far as trying to crystal ball what JS & Co. think of him, to hedge their beliefs on the matter.

If you look from an another angle, the defense kept the team in play for the NFC championship game. If you look at the totality of all games played over Petes tenure as a the coach, the defense was a bigger element on taking the ball over and giving it to the offense. There were so many 3 and outs and Bevell hating in the not too distant future. The defense wins championships, if the team was built in the philosophy of an high octane offense, I would readily agree with the thought process. If we don't have a stellar defense, Russel would be sitting on the sidelines instead of being on the field IMHO.
You're side-stepping one facet of the argument, in that a lot of those "3 And Outs" were because Russell Wilson has had to rely on his non-#1 Receivers to get somewhat open, hence, his nearly 900 Yards of tucking the ball in, and running for it.
Contrary to the worn out adage of "Defense Wins Championships", it would be way more accurate, and honest to say that Defenses HELP to win Championships.

It's still a fact that the Seahawks had a 10 point advantage for quite awhile in 49, but it was the Defense that couldn't hold Brady from eating up the deficit.

It's going to be interesting to see what kind of Season Wilson will have with the likes of Jimmy Graham on board.
The Offensive line has been pretty damned decent at pushing the running game up the ranks, but they pretty much suck at QB protection.

Kearse wasn't making the catches (interceptions) NFCCG, that's not all on RW, but ultimately, he managed to compete, and helped to get the win.

IF Wilson and his Agent are being unreasonable in negotiations, we will find out when all comes to light.
Until I hear the particulars, I'm not on board with putting all the blame on Wilson for the hold-ups.
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,798
Reaction score
1,265
Location
Phoenix az
scutterhawk":28fk4u8z said:
seahawks08":28fk4u8z said:
scutterhawk":28fk4u8z said:
Hawkpower":28fk4u8z said:
Unless of course JS doesn't value RW in the way we think he should or might.

Wouldn't surprise me to find out that the FO has a line in the sand that they aren't willing to cross...now or ever.

Debating the intelligence of such a stance is worthy, but the FO beats to their own drum, they value defense and running games, they have A LOT of superstars on the roster....and RW has some question marks, valid ones.

Maybe RW has leverage in most cases....but here? I don't know.

JS was beside himself with exuberant anticipation about getting "RW" in the Draft, and Pete Carroll designating him as the starter over Flynn & Jackson in his Rookie outing, + the culminating results of all three Seasons with him at the helm, and you honestly believe that JS doesn't see his value?

This "Running Game" is most effective BECAUSE of the numbers that Russell Wilson has helped to add to it, it is NOT all Marshawn Lynch's doing.

The Seahawks Defense is the absolute best, bar none, with no arguments, but, they are not of and by themselves, the only reason for the culminated success.

A lot of the blame for the loss in Super Bowl 49, was laid on RW, but, most people seem to have amnesia when it comes to the Patriots coming back from a 10 point deficit (against the Seahawks vaunted Defense) to secure the win.

As I see it, there are too many here, that want to downplay Russell Wilson's value, to fit their end of the argument, and even going so far as trying to crystal ball what JS & Co. think of him, to hedge their beliefs on the matter.

If you look from an another angle, the defense kept the team in play for the NFC championship game. If you look at the totality of all games played over Petes tenure as a the coach, the defense was a bigger element on taking the ball over and giving it to the offense. There were so many 3 and outs and Bevell hating in the not too distant future. The defense wins championships, if the team was built in the philosophy of an high octane offense, I would readily agree with the thought process. If we don't have a stellar defense, Russel would be sitting on the sidelines instead of being on the field IMHO.
You're side-stepping one facet of the argument, in that a lot of those "3 And Outs" were because Russell Wilson has had to rely on his non-#1 Receivers to get somewhat open, hence, his nearly 900 Yards of tucking the ball in, and running for it.
Contrary to the worn out adage of "Defense Wins Championships", it would be way more accurate, and honest to say that Defenses HELP to win Championships.

It's still a fact that the Seahawks had a 10 point advantage for quite awhile in 49, but it was the Defense that couldn't hold Brady from eating up the deficit.

It's going to be interesting to see what kind of Season Wilson will have with the likes of Jimmy Graham on board.
The Offensive line has been pretty damned decent at pushing the running game up the ranks, but they pretty much suck at QB protection.

Kearse wasn't making the catches (interceptions) NFCCG, that's not all on RW, but ultimately, he managed to compete, and helped to get the win.

IF Wilson and his Agent are being unreasonable in negotiations, we will find out when all comes to light.
Until I hear the particulars, I'm not on board with putting all the blame on Wilson for the hold-ups.


You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and you are clearly a HUUUUUGE Wilson fan so I won't begrudge you that.

You keep railing on our defense though, which I don't understand. Does that need to be done in order to justify some point about Wilson?? The defense is one of the best in history, and they were SO banged up at the end......and lets not forget..... had the defense not bailed Russ out of his putrid NFCCG performance there wouldn't have even been a Super Bowl to discuss....

Every QB in this league would give his left nut to play with a defense and run game like we have here. Why, as fans, are we criticizing our best asset..... our defense....... to prop up Wilson??????

BTW, while your points about the WR's has some merit, feel free to peruse the many vids posted here showing Russell missing WIDE OPEN receivers time after time after time......While I don't necessarily jump up and down regarding our WR crew, I still think there is enough reasonable doubt to wonder if the blame is all on them.....like you though, I am excited to see how he does with JG in the mix.
 

MORGULON

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
9,191
Reaction score
5,366
Location
Spokane, Wa
Marlin Man":2q8z4q41 said:
SERIOUSLY, I say screw 'em and let him play for peanuts again this year, put the tag on him net year then let him go for two 1st round picks, he isn't worth the money they are asking

hoppe he gets past this season without serious injury LOL

M.M.

Sick of it

If possible, I'd franchise him for two consecutive years? If so, he'd be almost 29 years old and at some point #3 is going
to not be as quick and will have to settle into a more traditional role. Can he be that type of qb?
 

lukerguy

Active member
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
2,320
Reaction score
20
Wilson has 100% of the leverage in the situation. If he wants to be the highest paid player with a fully guaranteed contract, then he will be the highest paid player with a fully guaranteed contract. The question is, will Seattle be the team who offer it? JS is so principled that if he truly believes Wilson is only worth $21MM and Wilson is asking for $25MM, he wouldn't give on it. This reminds me so much of the Drew Brees contract situation. I remembered being so shocked that a player like Brees who has won a SB and so classy having a bitter dispute. In hindsight, due to Brees' age, I'm not sure they made the right decision to fold to him.

WIlson is so hard to determine because the success started with him. They didn't start winning games against top 5 teams until the read option was installed late his first year.

The situation makes me more ill by the day. I was hoping Wilson would love Seattle so much that he would sign a nice contract similar to Big Ben or Newton...but it seems as though we have another Arod situation on our hands..that's not to say he doesn't deserve it, I honestly don't know. I don't think He's the best QB in the league but I sure am grateful to have a top 5 QB for once and don't want him to get away.
 

rideaducati

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
0
lukerguy":2w0rubj7 said:
Wilson has 100% of the leverage in the situation. If he wants to be the highest paid player with a fully guaranteed contract, then he will be the highest paid player with a fully guaranteed contract. The question is, will Seattle be the team who offer it? JS is so principled that if he truly believes Wilson is only worth $21MM and Wilson is asking for $25MM, he wouldn't give on it. This reminds me so much of the Drew Brees contract situation. I remembered being so shocked that a player like Brees who has won a SB and so classy having a bitter dispute. In hindsight, due to Brees' age, I'm not sure they made the right decision to fold to him.

WIlson is so hard to determine because the success started with him. They didn't start winning games against top 5 teams until the read option was installed late his first year.

The situation makes me more ill by the day. I was hoping Wilson would love Seattle so much that he would sign a nice contract similar to Big Ben or Newton...but it seems as though we have another Arod situation on our hands..that's not to say he doesn't deserve it, I honestly don't know. I don't think He's the best QB in the league but I sure am grateful to have a top 5 QB for once and don't want him to get away.

Wilson has zero leverage right now..zero. He is under contract and can't hold out if he wants to make it to free agency. Once he hits free agency next year, he'll be franchise tagged and he'll either sign the tag, a long term deal, or he won't play. Still not a lot of leverage, if any.

What some of you call leverage, I call stupidity. Sure, Russell can bet on himself and eek out an extra few million later, but that would be stupid. He plays a sport where career ending injuries happen on a yearly basis. By not signing this year, he will have to pay a high premium on an insurance policy that if not used, is just throwing A LOT of money away. By not signing this year, he doesn't have that big signing bonus making money for him by way of interest or investments which is throwing away even more money. If he doesn't get hurt, he has already lost a lot of money that isn't likely to be made up by signing a little bit bigger contract a year or two down the road.

There isn't a team in the league that is going to guarantee 100% of a long term contract. No team in the league will do this because then EVERY player would hold out for the same guarantee. If NFL teams guaranteed contracts, the NFL would then be like MLB and we would see players that can't play anymore still playing only because their contracts are guaranteed. The difference would be that in the NFL, they can't just pay someone else big money because there is a salary cap. Players that have career ending injuries would still have to be on the 53 man roster or the team would have to pay all of the guaranteed contract that is left out of the following year's cap. It's not going to happen.

Russell would have to make it through a minimum of 48 more games, while playing at a high level, without getting injured and then be three years into his new contract before he could possibly make up for the money he loses by not signing now. Russell will sign before the season starts because it makes the most business sense.
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
1,797
Hawkpower":21c7f5ou said:
scutterhawk":21c7f5ou said:
JS was beside himself with exuberant anticipation about getting "RW" in the Draft, and Pete Carroll designating him as the starter over Flynn & Jackson in his Rookie outing, + the culminating results of all three Seasons with him at the helm, and you honestly believe that JS doesn't see his value?

This "Running Game" is most effective BECAUSE of the numbers that Russell Wilson has helped to add to it, it is NOT all Marshawn Lynch's doing.

The Seahawks Defense is the absolute best, bar none, with no arguments, but, they are not of and by themselves, the only reason for the culminated success.

A lot of the blame for the loss in Super Bowl 49, was laid on RW, but, most people seem to have amnesia when it comes to the Patriots coming back from a 10 point deficit (against the Seahawks vaunted Defense) to secure the win.

As I see it, there are too many here, that want to downplay Russell Wilson's value, to fit their end of the argument, and even going so far as trying to crystal ball what JS & Co. think of him, to hedge their beliefs on the matter.

If you look from an another angle, the defense kept the team in play for the NFC championship game. If you look at the totality of all games played over Petes tenure as a the coach, the defense was a bigger element on taking the ball over and giving it to the offense. There were so many 3 and outs and Bevell hating in the not too distant future. The defense wins championships, if the team was built in the philosophy of an high octane offense, I would readily agree with the thought process. If we don't have a stellar defense, Russel would be sitting on the sidelines instead of being on the field IMHO.
You're side-stepping one facet of the argument, in that a lot of those "3 And Outs" were because Russell Wilson has had to rely on his non-#1 Receivers to get somewhat open, hence, his nearly 900 Yards of tucking the ball in, and running for it.
Contrary to the worn out adage of "Defense Wins Championships", it would be way more accurate, and honest to say that Defenses HELP to win Championships.

It's still a fact that the Seahawks had a 10 point advantage for quite awhile in 49, but it was the Defense that couldn't hold Brady from eating up the deficit.

It's going to be interesting to see what kind of Season Wilson will have with the likes of Jimmy Graham on board.
The Offensive line has been pretty damned decent at pushing the running game up the ranks, but they pretty much suck at QB protection.

Kearse wasn't making the catches (interceptions) NFCCG, that's not all on RW, but ultimately, he managed to compete, and helped to get the win.

IF Wilson and his Agent are being unreasonable in negotiations, we will find out when all comes to light.
Until I hear the particulars, I'm not on board with putting all the blame on Wilson for the hold-ups.[/quote]


You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and you are clearly a HUUUUUGE Wilson fan so I won't begrudge you that.

You keep railing on our defense though, which I don't understand. Does that need to be done in order to justify some point about Wilson?? The defense is one of the best in history, and they were SO banged up at the end......and lets not forget..... had the defense not bailed Russ out of his putrid NFCCG performance there wouldn't have even been a Super Bowl to discuss....

Every QB in this league would give his left nut to play with a defense and run game like we have here. Why, as fans, are we criticizing our best asset..... our defense....... to prop up Wilson??????

BTW, while your points about the WR's has some merit, feel free to peruse the many vids posted here showing Russell missing WIDE OPEN receivers time after time after time......While I don't necessarily jump up and down regarding our WR crew, I still think there is enough reasonable doubt to wonder if the blame is all on them.....like you though, I am excited to see how he does with JG in the mix.[/quote]

Being realistic here, yes, I am a big Russell Wilson fan..... what reason would I have not to be?
"Let's not forget" the 10 + points come back by the Patriots.
Yes I have readily admitted that the Defense was playing with a lot of injuries, which shifted the load back on our Quarterback to take up the challenge of moving down the field quickly, and surprisingly, he did manage to get us within one Yard of winning that game.
Of the "Railing on the Defense"?, not so, I'm just not buying that Defenses win Championships, at least not to the tune of it don't matter who the Quarterback is, because more often than not, there have been very, very few so-so Quarterbacks that have rode in on the backs of their Defenses, (well, except maybe Trent Dilfer)
People are pissed, or getting there pretty quick, at Pre-Blaming Russell Wilson for CAP issues that haven't even happened yet, and that's just goofy.
 

Trenchbroom

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
2,835
Reaction score
4
Location
Spokangeles
Time to extend Bobby and Sweezy. At this point I will be more upset if we don't sign at least one of these two before training camp than not signing Russ.

Mr. Perfect wants to gamble by playing out his rookie contract? Let's do it.
 
OP
OP
hawknation2015

hawknation2015

New member
Joined
Dec 31, 2014
Messages
5,439
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, Washington
Another scary profile of Wilson's "father figure"/attorney chasing that bottom line . . .
http://www.seattletimes.com/sports/seah ... ll-wilson/

“If I was going to criticize anything in the NFL, people in general don’t put enough value in free agency,’’ Rodgers said. “They don’t really wrap their arms around the idea of the kind of leverage and opportunity that it presents for their clients, because at the end of the day, the only way to truly find out a player’s value is to take them into a free market and let the bidding begin.’’
 

Hasselbeck

New member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
11,397
Reaction score
4
If you read up on Mark Rodgers, you will quickly see that the thing he does most for his baseball clients is that he gets them to free agency. He squeezed the Mets on Mike Hampton. He's squeezed several teams already on Jeff Samardzija

Those saying Russell has no leverage are kidding themselves. He has plenty of leverage and he and his agent knows it. Also the tag numbers kidhawk posted are for the non-exclusive franchise tender.. if you slap that on him you leave yourself open to get Hutchinson'd on a deal. The exclusive rights tender would be a touch north of 25M for 2016... 2017 that same tender would be too much to use.

So they have between now and February 2017 to get something done.. and given his agents history, I don't think its a safe bet to assume that happens if his ultimate goal is to get his client to free agency.

I think the only way this realistically gets done is if..

1) Wilson tells his agent to cut the crap and work out a deal with the Seahawks and that he doesn't want to leave.
2) Wilson fires his agent outright then works out a deal with new agent or separate from one (not unprecedented, has happened many times)
3) JS concedes and overpays

This isn't even factoring in a possible Andrew Luck extension before Wilson's deal is done... or another Super Bowl win + possible MVP.. which only raises that price even more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top