WendellWent":rlrmvljh said:
You do realize Kip Earlywine is on record rooting for the Hawks to lose for draft position, yes?
I'd say that's horribly inaccurate.
I would concede that many fans can see the ultimate wisdom in losing for draft position as it pertains to acquiring a franchise QB. I certainly did and do ascribe to that viewpoint. The simple fact is, there is a genuine statistical precipice in the draft order when it comes to QB availability via the draft. Going back 20 years, if you pick at 12 or later, your hit rate on QBs drafted is at or around 5%. In the top 11 picks, that jumps up to around 60%.
Seattle was a team not unlike all other bad teams currently in the NFL. A team without a franchise QB. That state is simply ruinous for a franchise and can last upwards of a decade or more where your team never is capable of contending.
It's not that he hoped we would lose to improve draft stock. But more like a painful concession that it may likely result for the better in the long run.
Seattle's local experience with acquiring QBs is really kind of warped. We colloquially see drafting QBs early as extended periods of suck. Kelly Stouffer, Rick Mirer and Dan McGwire give us this sense that the practice just leads to long periods of suffering. But not all franchises spend 3 high picks on QBs over the course of 8 years only to see zero benefit. And of course, had Behring not overruled Knox and forced us to take McGwire instead of Knox's choice of Brett Favre -- our experience would have differed tremendously.
The reality is, not all draft classes are equal. Some years you have talent in the draft and those that suck that year climb out of the abyss that is not having a franchise QB. Some years, you suck but the class stinks and you find that your year of suck wasn't quite bad enough and you end up missing out on the legit talent and have to take Aaron Curry at 4th overall.
Or worse. You have an all time worst record in franchise history, but because you managed to beat a similarly bad NE team -- you end up left with Rick Mirer because you didn't suck quite enough to get Drew Bledsoe.
Advocating for the wisdom of gaining draft position is one based on long term understanding about risk, coupled with an acceptance that one or two years at the very bottom
with the right talent available is better overall than 12+ years middling in the 6-9 win range. For many fans, they don't accept that idea. Without an agreement on basic principle -- the two sides will never agree.
And in fact will invoke hyperbole as quoted above claiming that the other side WANTS us to lose. All fans want the team to be successful. We'd all rather not lose.