Oh yeah for sure, probably our 2nd rd aswell. but if they feel Daniels is their guy go get him!Maye will be gone for sure before #5, and I doubt Daniels is worth the cost. They would probably want our first round 2025 pick.
Oh yeah for sure, probably our 2nd rd aswell. but if they feel Daniels is their guy go get him!Maye will be gone for sure before #5, and I doubt Daniels is worth the cost. They would probably want our first round 2025 pick.
I put more stock in game film then the underwear Olympics. Bobo being a prime example, he ain't no Tyreke, but he ain't no 4.9 eitherWell, it’s 700 points on the trade value chart. So we are already paying them a premium in the trade, unless you figure Seahawks are top-7 in W-L for 2024.
PFF now rates Nix as #4 QB. Personally, I would take him at #16. But if you want to take a little risk, trade back a little lower. Let’s see how all these guys look coming out of the combine.
In my best Madden voice...Geno no
Cousins no
Draft qbotf yes
Draft two qbotf's yes
Let them duke it out aka Wilson/Flynn
Do whatever it takes to draft The Guy. Without him, you have nothing.
Overly risky to just take two rookies and call it a day. Better chance of success keeping a veteran on roster and selecting the rookie you actually want to develop.Geno no
Cousins no
Draft qbotf yes
Draft two qbotf's yes
Let them duke it out aka Wilson/Flynn
Do whatever it takes to draft The Guy. Without him, you have nothing.
Assuming the trigger is there to pull, of course.As I stated in another thread: The only way I'm down for keeping Geno is as a very short term bridge quarterback, while we wait for a rookie to develop. The thing with Geno is that he's not going to take you where you ultimately want to go so it's best not to prolong it. Must stop screwing around and draft a QB this year. John is from the Green Bay school where they are used to drafting quarterbacks regularly. I think without Pete around pushing for other positions, John will finally pull the trigger.
Bears did it to FieldsAssuming the trigger is there to pull, of course.
We're talking about the most sought after commodity in pro sports, not something you just decide to grab. It isn't a guaranteed item that you can buy for a set price. There's competition for the legit ones, and then there are fliers on the developmental ones.
Not only that, but then you have to hit on actually developing the guy. Not all of them benefit from starting right away, and why would you want to lose games in the meantime?
What people are advocating for here is the method that loser organizations get themselves into hell with. Just losing your balls off and then "time to pull the trigger on whatever quarterback is in front of us and then we ruin him because we became a losing organization!" a la Chicago.
Me, I like to compete in the meantime. I'm sure every single coach and player feels quite the same about that, too.
Bridge quarterbacks are not bad. Competent play at the spot is not bad. Any ceilings we're putting on the team because of the quarterback spot are, in the end, an invention of our own imagination. They're not real.
Nick Foles won a Super Bowl. Case Keenum made an NFCCG. Blake Bortles made an AFCCG.
Geno had the season that Jared Goff had this year in 2022. Unlike Goff, Geno did it with a middling to bad line, no run game, Shane Waldron instead of hottest-coordinator-in-football Ben Johnson, and an objectively terrible defense.
So, yes, Geno is a bridge, and yes, a quarterback for the future should be sought after. This does not mean that we need to blow it all up because we're angsty that we don't have that guy yet, and it doesn't mean we need to start blowing picks on a guy just to say we did. Wait for the right fit, compete in the meantime. It's the only right way.
I don't disagree entirely, except to say we did the rookie thing in 2012 and it worked out spectacularly well for us, did it not? Although, I forgot Flynn wasn't a rookie.Overly risky to just take two rookies and call it a day. Better chance of success keeping a veteran on roster and selecting the rookie you actually want to develop.
We may want to hammer volume until we find ourselves lucking into a top quarterback, but the playoffs are half comprised of Geno level or below starters right now. Goff, Pickett, Love, Joe Flacco...
No reason to destroy all continuity for funsies. Build a nest for the QBOTF and fly in the meantime.
Nix threw 4,500 yards, 45 TDs, 77% completion rate, only 3 interceptions.-- And I cannot tell you how bad an idea DJ Uiagalelei is. My daughter was at OSU. I was at most of their home games, so had the bigger view as opposed to TV. That kid makes his reads so slowly. They often tried to cut the field in half for him. Still struggled to read a simple high low concept. Arm strength was good sometimes but misfired a lot.
-- Nix and McCarthy are run game facilitators. Did you really see either of them make wow plays with their arms.
-- Unless it is the fifth round, I would be bummed about any of the three. I would pray I was wrong, but would be very pessimistic.
Mase
The answer is right in front of our eyes.