Projects

davidonmi

New member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
2,507
Reaction score
0
With the depth they already have on the roster, should Schneider consider taking high upside, low floor guys who won't contribute now but will be ready and really good when the hawks hit the cap wall, especially with 10 pix
 

seahawks875

New member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
I think I quinton Patton isn't available at 56, I think Christine Michael is the pick, high ceiling low floor.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
30,768
Reaction score
7,325
Location
Kent, WA
It's a good point. We are nearly stocked at starter level, with the exception of WLB, and maybe some injury returners. For once we don't really need any draft picks to start right away.

Picking guys more for their upside than their current readiness makes a little sense. Ties in with the BPA strategy, too. Most picks this draft will not need to start immediately, and will probably have a season or two before they need to step up. But anybody who excels and shows good stuff could start, assuming they win the competition in camp.
 

kigenzun

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
394
Reaction score
0
We got lots of places to possibly upgrade, and we aiming for the bright, big city lights of NYC... so let's get guys that can contribute this year, and save us money next... but let's not overthink it by looking too far ahead.
 

Mr.Hawkbrah

New member
Joined
Mar 15, 2013
Messages
348
Reaction score
0
i pretty much agree with the op. another point about this is think of it this way, there's usually lots of safer ROUND 1 picks that will still be great contributors. but were talking 2nd 3rd and so on. the degree of safeness and still getting top notch talent is diminishing by the round. there isnt tons of roster space open, which means a player must potentially have enough talent to beat out someone on a talented roster.

just to pick at the "wont contribute now" part for arguments sake i think thats redundant. I see your point because yes, it often takes time to develop talent. but the point of talent is that it has the potential to show at any time, aka poppa petes philosophy about always competing will always give those highly talented guys to contribute right away. i dont really see the argument safe vs risky either way in later rounds, i think 3rd and on the gap is pretty shallow either way, its more hit or miss generally imo.

i personally hope they draft a balanced TE for depth and due to good talent pool this year for this type of TE's, and also to groom to fill zachs shoes in the 2nd. a big nasty dt in the 3rd, OT/ big reciever in 4th, explosive rb type in 5th. whatever else is icing on the cake. honey badger anywhere between 5 and on would be sweet. i just dont see them drafting too many guys that have low ceilings.
 
Top