ponies vs ponies

[Jay-Dog]

I been thinking about this match up. Does lucky Luck spurn the big bad Peyton promise land on Sunday? I feel an upset coming....thoughts? Or will this be a repeat of Dallas, QB vs QB. Who's got the nuts?

 

[RolandDeschain]

I'm annoyed that the Colts beat us, but I'm rooting for 'em this week. Chant it with me - "NO MORE UNDEFEATEDS! NO MORE UNDEFEATEDS!"

 

[Carmon1274]

Why? Im rooting for Denver to beat the Colts, because it makes Colts record look worse with a loss, 4-3. Also a team that is undefeated, would try to focus remain undefeated, and that will hurt them 2 ways. Injuries and mistakes in the long run. Losing games will help teams learn what mistakes they have to fix. Losing against Colts, made me learn that Browner is being picked on, and that made Pete bench him against the Titans game.

 

[RolandDeschain]

Because if Denver manages to go 19-0, I will vomit explosively, Carmon.

I don't like vomiting explosively unless it's on Sac.

 

[Carmon1274]

Because if Denver manages to go 19-0, I will vomit explosively, Carmon.

I don't like vomiting explosively unless it's on Sac.

I already mentioned why Denver should win, meaning kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I can't believe how ignorant you are.

 

[therealjohncarlson]

Why? Im rooting for Denver to beat the Colts, because it makes Colts record look worse with a loss, 4-3. Also a team that is undefeated, would try to focus remain undefeated, and that will hurt them 2 ways. Injuries and mistakes in the long run. Losing games will help teams learn what mistakes they have to fix. Losing against Colts, made me learn that Browner is being picked on, and that made Pete bench him against the Titans game.

Please. Thinking its bad for a team to go undefeated is loser talk. GO COLTS!!

 

[RolandDeschain]

I already mentioned why Denver should win, meaning kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I can't believe how ignorant you are.

Dude. Out of line much? Geez.

 

[therealjohncarlson]

Why? Im rooting for Denver to beat the Colts, because it makes Colts record look worse with a loss, 4-3. Also a team that is undefeated, would try to focus remain undefeated, and that will hurt them 2 ways. Injuries and mistakes in the long run. Losing games will help teams learn what mistakes they have to fix. Losing against Colts, made me learn that Browner is being picked on, and that made Pete bench him against the Titans game.

To expand a little bit, you claim "losing games will help teams learn what mistakes they have to fix" which is basically a logical fallacy. So according to you losing games helps teams figure out how to better win games in the future? But if we conclude winning games is the end goal, why would it not be better to win any single game instead of losing it...? According to you losing games is on the front end of the ultimate path to then winning games in the future, after you learn from your mistakes and improve.... so who's not to say the Broncos didn't already lose some games on the front end of their path, and our now in the later stage of their development, the one where they already learned from losing games and are now winning games?

Basically, you say losing a game leads to improvement, so why not just lose every game? That means extra improvement right? Brilliant, let's lose every game so we know exactly what went wrong and what to fix in the future.

/rant

 

[Carmon1274]

I forgot to say that them going undefeated in pre-season would mean nothing on Seattle as they are in different Divisions. Meaning if this was a NFC team, it would be something to worry about as everyone fighting for the #1 seed home field advantage.

But this is Denver, and strategist would say let them win it all.

#1. Injuries
#2. Mistakes

Didn't the 2001 Mariners tied with one of the best records? Look what happened to them.


Do you remember to the 2011 Packers?

 

[therealjohncarlson]

So once again, why not lose every game? More mistakes to learn from right? You still haven't addressed the fact that your "losing is good to learn mistakes" is a logical fallacy

 

[minormillikin]

If the Colts win, it will really help our BCS rankings.

 

[Carmon1274]

So once again, why not lose every game? More mistakes to learn from right? You still haven't addressed the fact that your "losing is good to learn mistakes" is a logical fallacy

I said "Losing games "

not losing every games

If you're gonna question me with something give me a right question so i can give you an right answer.

 

[therealjohncarlson]

So once again, why not lose every game? More mistakes to learn from right? You still haven't addressed the fact that your "losing is good to learn mistakes" is a logical fallacy

I said "Losing games "

not losing every games

If you're gonna question me with something give me a right question so i can give you an right answer.

Why would it ever be in a teams best interest to lose a game? When teams lose games they want to learn from them so they can win every future game possible, not win most games and occasionally lose other games.

 

[Carmon1274]

So once again, why not lose every game? More mistakes to learn from right? You still haven't addressed the fact that your "losing is good to learn mistakes" is a logical fallacy

I said "Losing games "

not losing every games

If you're gonna question me with something give me a right question so i can give you an right answer.

Why would it ever be in a teams best interest to lose a game? When teams lose games they want to learn from them so they can win every future game possible, not win most games and occasionally lose other games.

Name a team that had a 19-0 record
How many teams got to 18-1?

I'm not gonna be a prophet and say what kind of mistake would happen but, what if RW did what Schaub did with the pick 6. Or what if Lynch or Michael or even Turbin did what Ryan Mathews did in the final 2 minute of the play where he went out of bounds.


I'm not here to irritate you I'm here to post what I think is right. I don't know if you guys are trolling at me or what but once again Denver attempting 16-0 and preserving the record will be their downfall.

Once again 2011 Packers 15-1 Injuries hurt them so bad. D got exposed in the first playoffs against Giants, and they *Tried* to beat KC but lost 2 OL Starters.

 

[OkieHawk]

So once again, why not lose every game? More mistakes to learn from right? You still haven't addressed the fact that your "losing is good to learn mistakes" is a logical fallacy

I said "Losing games "

not losing every games

If you're gonna question me with something give me a right question so i can give you an right answer.

Why would it ever be in a teams best interest to lose a game? When teams lose games they want to learn from them so they can win every future game possible, not win most games and occasionally lose other games.

Name a team that had a 19-0 record
How many teams got to 18-1?

I'm not gonna be a prophet and say what kind of mistake would happen but, what if RW did what Schaub did with the pick 6. Or what if Lynch or Michael or even Turbin did what Ryan Mathews did in the final 2 minute of the play where he went out of bounds.


I'm not here to irritate you I'm here to post what I think is right. I don't know if you guys are trolling at me or what but once again Denver attempting 16-0 and preserving the record will be their downfall.

Once again 2011 Packers 15-1 Injuries hurt them so bad. D got exposed in the first playoffs against Giants, and they *Tried* to beat KC but lost 2 OL Starters.

Their downfall is the playoffs because Peyton is at the helm. So that means winning or losing right now means bubkes, so go Colts for this game.

 

[BleedGreenNblue]

Just an exciting match up. Not rooting for either team. Just Gunna be an awesome QB showdown. They have very similar play styles

 

[Exittium]

So it goes what? Colts grow up to be Broncos, and Broncos, retire to die as Cowboys? (wife didnt think it was funny since she's a denver fan lol)

 

[Kixkahn]

I could see the upset because the Broncos don't have a great secondary and Luck has plenty of luck of guys getting open.

 

[Smelly McUgly]

Didn't the 2001 Mariners tied with one of the best records? Look what happened to them.

Because the small sample size of a seven-game series proves more about how good the 2001 Mariners were than the large sample size of 162 games, right?

 

[hawk45]

Didn't the 2001 Mariners tied with one of the best records? Look what happened to them.

Because the small sample size of a seven-game series proves more about how good the 2001 Mariners were than the large sample size of 162 games, right?

Well it kind of does that's why the playoffs determine the world champion and not the regular season. Playoff baseball is a whole different animal than regular season baseball.