seabowl
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2009
- Messages
- 5,381
- Reaction score
- 2,601
Agree but for an A+ a franchise qb would be requiredWould have been nice to get one, but I don't see one we passed up.
Agree but for an A+ a franchise qb would be requiredWould have been nice to get one, but I don't see one we passed up.
Well they certainly interviewed them all!I guess you could dock it for not coming out of it with a young QB considering two top 10 picks.
Why?Again, it’s strictly based on the draft selections.
That's my unanswered question as well.Why?
As the OP, I wanted to see what folks thought of how they perceived the Seahawks did with the actual picks received. It is not a trade based poll, but rather a poll based on how you think the Seahawks did with the the choices they made with those picks. Think of it as when the Cowboys traded Herschel Walker to the Vikings, people aren’t talking about the Herschel Walker part but what actually the cowboys did with those picks.That's my unanswered question as well.
Is the original post of incomplete trade information an attempt at poll steering for some undisclosed shaping of opinion? Opinion herding? Why was the 4th round pick the Broncos received excluded? While all the Seahawks draft picks were included?. Why was Russell Wilson included in the trade for consideration? But, all three of the veterans that the Seahawks received excluded.
Why not disclose all the trade details like so .......................................
View attachment 68773
How is a poll based on the incomplete polling information presented in the original post of any value. What good is it? What purpose does it serve? Is it some kind of attempt at cat herding?