Poll: Overall grade for Hawks Russell Wilson compensation selections

Overall grade for Seahawks Russell Wilson trade draft selections

  • A+

    Votes: 31 29.5%
  • A

    Votes: 35 33.3%
  • B+

    Votes: 20 19.0%
  • B

    Votes: 12 11.4%
  • C+

    Votes: 2 1.9%
  • C

    Votes: 3 2.9%
  • D+

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • D

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • F

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    105

Wsumatt1982

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Messages
1,988
Reaction score
2,842
I gave it an A. 4 of the 5 are solid players. To shore up 4 positions instead of 1 is what pushed me to an A
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
14,426
Reaction score
2,944
That's my unanswered question as well.

Is the original post of incomplete trade information an attempt at poll steering for some undisclosed shaping of opinion? Opinion herding? Why was the 4th round pick the Broncos received excluded? While all the Seahawks draft picks were included?. Why was Russell Wilson included in the trade for consideration? But, all three of the veterans that the Seahawks received excluded.

Why not disclose all the trade details like so .......................................

1735190323751

How is a poll based on the incomplete polling information presented in the original post of any value. What good is it? What purpose does it serve? Is it some kind of attempt at cat herding?
 
OP
OP
seabowl

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
6,298
Reaction score
4,086
That's my unanswered question as well.

Is the original post of incomplete trade information an attempt at poll steering for some undisclosed shaping of opinion? Opinion herding? Why was the 4th round pick the Broncos received excluded? While all the Seahawks draft picks were included?. Why was Russell Wilson included in the trade for consideration? But, all three of the veterans that the Seahawks received excluded.

Why not disclose all the trade details like so .......................................

View attachment 68773

How is a poll based on the incomplete polling information presented in the original post of any value. What good is it? What purpose does it serve? Is it some kind of attempt at cat herding?
As the OP, I wanted to see what folks thought of how they perceived the Seahawks did with the actual picks received. It is not a trade based poll, but rather a poll based on how you think the Seahawks did with the the choices they made with those picks. Think of it as when the Cowboys traded Herschel Walker to the Vikings, people aren’t talking about the Herschel Walker part but what actually the cowboys did with those picks.

It’s obvious the Seahawks won the trade.
 

bileever

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Messages
3,070
Reaction score
4,398
Forgot to include the $250 million that you saved.
 

Dallashawksfan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
635
Reaction score
520
I changed my vote to A+

Even if they got nothing back, get rid of Wilson contract alone was an A
 

Dallashawksfan

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
635
Reaction score
520
That's my unanswered question as well.

Is the original post of incomplete trade information an attempt at poll steering for some undisclosed shaping of opinion? Opinion herding? Why was the 4th round pick the Broncos received excluded? While all the Seahawks draft picks were included?. Why was Russell Wilson included in the trade for consideration? But, all three of the veterans that the Seahawks received excluded.

Why not disclose all the trade details like so .......................................

View attachment 68773

How is a poll based on the incomplete polling information presented in the original post of any value. What good is it? What purpose does it serve? Is it some kind of attempt at cat herding?
To be fair the rest of the package became irrelevant
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
14,426
Reaction score
2,944
irrelevant for some and yet relevant to others.

Events along a timeline provide insight.

Full event disclosure is fairness.

1772315507007
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
5,715
Reaction score
4,378
Location
Spokane
I really think that JSN should be included in this discussion. The Seahawks chose Spoon with the Broncos pick at #5 and then took JSN later in the first round. WR was not considered a position of need going into that draft, but with the added pick at #5 of Witherspoon whose position was needed, the JSN availability became a luxury pick.
Without the Wilson trade I highly doubt JSN would have been a Seahawk. Super Bowl LX would not have happened without that trade. RW helped win two Lombardis for the Seahawks.
 

SKitsapHawk77

Active member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
123
Reaction score
73
Solid A to A+. Cross is one of the better L tackles in the league, Mafe has been good and should bring us a compensation pick if / when he signs elseware. I love Hall. He will continue to grow into a D Law type beast. Getting rid of a growing cancer in the clubhouse (Mr. Unlimited) his salary and getting Spoon along with the above. Only dreamers could ask for more.
 

Latest posts

Top