OMG, on a 49er forum about can the Seahawks be dethroned

[loafoftatupu]

:woohoo: There are some really smart and knowledgeable posters there in the WebZone, so I can see why she would cite that Board for some info.

Sure there are Giedi. But whenever they post anything remotely realistic they get thrashed on by the Legion of Drool.

 

[ZorntoLargent]

Did the 49ers draft a 6 year old? C Hyde artwork for rare Panini card...........

 

[lvnginhwktwn]

9ers suck. Broncos suck. At least the niners sort of put up a fight and made a game of it. Broncos are a bunch of little girls.

And so are their fans.

Sort of put up a fight? Did you actually watch the game? You won but a couple plays or calls and you could have been watching the 9ers beat the Bronco's.

 

[Sports Hernia]

9ers suck. Broncos suck. At least the niners sort of put up a fight and made a game of it. Broncos are a bunch of little girls.

And so are their fans.

Sort of put up a fight? Did you actually watch the game? You won but a couple plays or calls and you could have been watching the 9ers beat the Bronco's.

LOL, wrong. The result of the NFCCC was never in doubt. You guys had no shot to win that game, you just thought you did. There was literally never any moment in that game where I thought 'damn, we might lose here'. 9ers just suck. Own it.

Gawd damn you have been so right lately! :th2thumbs:

 

[loafoftatupu]

I get so many laughs from the DenialNiners who talk about one play or call changing the outcome of the game.

It is always a one way deal. We have heard about "almost" "inches" and "bad calls" this entire offseason as if it means anything to the actual outcome. You know they are hurting when their argument is that they almost won.

You won't ever read a DenialNiner post about how one more yard or a FG puts the Niners out of reach before the "Tip", or not kicking a fumble forward for a first down prevents the TD that followed it from happening.

The mantra is always the same, the excuses have changed, but none of it can change that the Hawks won a Super Bowl. The DenialNiner has gone from "the Seahags won't win the division" (even though they have done it more in the last 10 years than any other NFCW team) to "the Seahags won't win the Super Bowl" to "the Hags Super Bowl doesn't matter because they could have lost to the Niners".

Whatever happens in the future, the DenialNiner cannot take away what the Hawks did. Nothing the Niners do in 2014 can change history. Unfortunately for the DenialNiner, it won't be any easier for digits to displace the Hawks this season.

 

[Giedi]

:woohoo: There are some really smart and knowledgeable posters there in the WebZone, so I can see why she would cite that Board for some info.

Sure there are Giedi. But whenever they post anything remotely realistic they get thrashed on by the Legion of Drool.

I don't mind. The WebZone definitely is a place for crazy and insane 49er fans. I kind of like it that way. :thirishdrinkers: It's just the nature of that board. Now because of the recent excellence of the Seattle Team, that board holds a special kind of feeling for Seattle Fans and their team. Not denying it. It's reality. Seattle fans visiting should be honored for being beheld with such a unique feeling from the 49er fans. I know some Seattle fans do, but unfortunately most don't appreciate it. :mrgreen:

 

[Giedi]

I get so many laughs from the DenialNiners who talk about one play or call changing the outcome of the game.

It is always a one way deal. We have heard about "almost" "inches" and "bad calls" this entire offseason as if it means anything to the actual outcome. You know they are hurting when their argument is that they almost won.

You won't ever read a DenialNiner post about how one more yard or a FG puts the Niners out of reach before the "Tip", or not kicking a fumble forward for a first down prevents the TD that followed it from happening.

The mantra is always the same, the excuses have changed, but none of it can change that the Hawks won a Super Bowl. The DenialNiner has gone from "the Seahags won't win the division" (even though they have done it more in the last 10 years than any other NFCW team) to "the Seahags won't win the Super Bowl" to "the Hags Super Bowl doesn't matter because they could have lost to the Niners".

Whatever happens in the future, the DenialNiner cannot take away what the Hawks did. Nothing the Niners do in 2014 can change history. Unfortunately for the DenialNiner, it won't be any easier for digits to displace the Hawks this season.

Loafo, it's not that - that *one* play or *one* bad call - ruined our *one* chance at a super bowl. It's that just that *one* play or *one* bad call ruined *many* opportunities at *many* superbowls. Some of our 20+ playoff appearance games were so close that a play or a call *was* the difference. So while you might think the 49er fans are complaining about a bad play against Seattle, or complaining about a bad call that went for Seattle, really it's just an amalgamation of *so* many calls or so many *critical* plays that Seattle just gets the brunt of that, because it's the most recent team that did that, in a very long line of good teams that have done that to us through the years. :white_flag:

 

[UK_Seahawk]

I get so many laughs from the DenialNiners who talk about one play or call changing the outcome of the game.

It is always a one way deal. We have heard about "almost" "inches" and "bad calls" this entire offseason as if it means anything to the actual outcome. You know they are hurting when their argument is that they almost won.

You won't ever read a DenialNiner post about how one more yard or a FG puts the Niners out of reach before the "Tip", or not kicking a fumble forward for a first down prevents the TD that followed it from happening.

The mantra is always the same, the excuses have changed, but none of it can change that the Hawks won a Super Bowl. The DenialNiner has gone from "the Seahags won't win the division" (even though they have done it more in the last 10 years than any other NFCW team) to "the Seahags won't win the Super Bowl" to "the Hags Super Bowl doesn't matter because they could have lost to the Niners".

Whatever happens in the future, the DenialNiner cannot take away what the Hawks did. Nothing the Niners do in 2014 can change history. Unfortunately for the DenialNiner, it won't be any easier for digits to displace the Hawks this season.

Loafo, it's not that - that *one* play or *one* bad call - ruined our *one* chance at a super bowl. It's that just that *one* play or *one* bad call ruined *many* opportunities at *many* superbowls. Some of our 20+ playoff appearance games were so close that a play or a call *was* the difference. So while you might think the 49er fans are complaining about a bad play against Seattle, or complaining about a bad call that went for Seattle, really it's just an amalgamation of *so* many calls or so many *critical* plays that Seattle just gets the brunt of that, because it's the most recent team that did that, in a very long line of good teams that have done that to us through the years. :white_flag:

It's funny how all you whiners bang on about luck, who was it that said "the harder I worked the luckier I got"?

The truth is you havent been good enough and that's why you havent won anything for a long time. Maybe you need to work harder and have better talent, that's what the Seahawks did and that's why they are superbowl champions / not whining about missed calls and missed chances.

When you think that a team is luckier than you then you have already lost.

 

[Sports Hernia]

I get so many laughs from the DenialNiners who talk about one play or call changing the outcome of the game.

It is always a one way deal. We have heard about "almost" "inches" and "bad calls" this entire offseason as if it means anything to the actual outcome. You know they are hurting when their argument is that they almost won.

You won't ever read a DenialNiner post about how one more yard or a FG puts the Niners out of reach before the "Tip", or not kicking a fumble forward for a first down prevents the TD that followed it from happening.

The mantra is always the same, the excuses have changed, but none of it can change that the Hawks won a Super Bowl. The DenialNiner has gone from "the Seahags won't win the division" (even though they have done it more in the last 10 years than any other NFCW team) to "the Seahags won't win the Super Bowl" to "the Hags Super Bowl doesn't matter because they could have lost to the Niners".

Whatever happens in the future, the DenialNiner cannot take away what the Hawks did. Nothing the Niners do in 2014 can change history. Unfortunately for the DenialNiner, it won't be any easier for digits to displace the Hawks this season.

Loafo, it's not that - that *one* play or *one* bad call - ruined our *one* chance at a super bowl. It's that just that *one* play or *one* bad call ruined *many* opportunities at *many* superbowls. Some of our 20+ playoff appearance games were so close that a play or a call *was* the difference. So while you might think the 49er fans are complaining about a bad play against Seattle, or complaining about a bad call that went for Seattle, really it's just an amalgamation of *so* many calls or so many *critical* plays that Seattle just gets the brunt of that, because it's the most recent team that did that, in a very long line of good teams that have done that to us through the years. :white_flag:

It's funny how all you whiners bang on about luck, who was it that said "the harder I worked the luckier I got"?

The truth is you havent been good enough and that's why you havent won anything for a long time. Maybe you need to work harder and have better talent, that's what the Seahawks did and that's why they are superbowl champions / not whining about missed calls and missed chances.

When you think that a team is luckier than you then you have already lost.

Was going to post something along those lines. It was like a decade and a half ago when the Mariners were actually GOOD, and the the hated Yankees would come to town and barely beat Seattle as they would always seem to get the breaks.

Then it dawned on me. Well prepared, talented teams make their own luck. Same goes for the current reigning Super Bowl champions Hawks team, they make their own luck!

 

[Giedi]

I get so many laughs from the DenialNiners who talk about one play or call changing the outcome of the game.

It is always a one way deal. We have heard about "almost" "inches" and "bad calls" this entire offseason as if it means anything to the actual outcome. You know they are hurting when their argument is that they almost won.

You won't ever read a DenialNiner post about how one more yard or a FG puts the Niners out of reach before the "Tip", or not kicking a fumble forward for a first down prevents the TD that followed it from happening.

The mantra is always the same, the excuses have changed, but none of it can change that the Hawks won a Super Bowl. The DenialNiner has gone from "the Seahags won't win the division" (even though they have done it more in the last 10 years than any other NFCW team) to "the Seahags won't win the Super Bowl" to "the Hags Super Bowl doesn't matter because they could have lost to the Niners".

Whatever happens in the future, the DenialNiner cannot take away what the Hawks did. Nothing the Niners do in 2014 can change history. Unfortunately for the DenialNiner, it won't be any easier for digits to displace the Hawks this season.

Loafo, it's not that - that *one* play or *one* bad call - ruined our *one* chance at a super bowl. It's that just that *one* play or *one* bad call ruined *many* opportunities at *many* superbowls. Some of our 20+ playoff appearance games were so close that a play or a call *was* the difference. So while you might think the 49er fans are complaining about a bad play against Seattle, or complaining about a bad call that went for Seattle, really it's just an amalgamation of *so* many calls or so many *critical* plays that Seattle just gets the brunt of that, because it's the most recent team that did that, in a very long line of good teams that have done that to us through the years. :white_flag:

It's funny how all you whiners bang on about luck, who was it that said "the harder I worked the luckier I got"?

The truth is you havent been good enough and that's why you havent won anything for a long time. Maybe you need to work harder and have better talent, that's what the Seahawks did and that's why they are superbowl champions / not whining about missed calls and missed chances.

When you think that a team is luckier than you then you have already lost.

I don't know about not winning anything for a long time. 3 NFC championships and a super bowl appearance isn't *average* so while the 49ers haven't won any super bowls recently, the consistency is there. My buddie Loafo will of course bring up Buffalo with 4 super bowl losses - and label that the kind of consistency we'll have going forward. That may or may not be the case, we don't know, but it's not like this franchise isn't familiar with the standards of excellence in *winning* super bowls. We have a couple of coaches with super bowl rings. They are familiar with It. It's just a matter of staying in the hunt.

Seattle is fine team, no question about it. Russell Wilson is a fantastic quarterback. But when the 49ers repeated, I don't remember Lott calling out opposing WR's or Roger Craig holding out for more money. :mrgreen:

 

[Shadowhawk]

:woohoo: There are some really smart and knowledgeable posters there in the WebZone, so I can see why she would cite that Board for some info.

Sure there are Giedi. But whenever they post anything remotely realistic they get thrashed on by the Legion of Drool.

I don't mind. The WebZone definitely is a place for crazy and insane 49er fans. I kind of like it that way. :thirishdrinkers: It's just the nature of that board. Now because of the recent excellence of the Seattle Team, that board holds a special kind of feeling for Seattle Fans and their team. Not denying it. It's reality. Seattle fans visiting should be honored for being beheld with such a unique feeling from the 49er fans. I know some Seattle fans do, but unfortunately most don't appreciate it. :mrgreen:

Well, I appreciated it when this happened:

 

[loafoftatupu]

I don't know about not winning anything for a long time. 3 NFC championships and a super bowl appearance isn't *average* so while the 49ers haven't won any super bowls recently, the consistency is there.

Whoa there Skipper.

3 NFC championships? Or making it to 3 Championship games?

I know for a fact that until 2011, making it to an NFC championship game and losing a Super Bowl equated to nothing according to Niner fans.

Winning the division was no accomplishment when the Hawks did it 4 years straight and 5 times 7 years. That was until 2011. The Hawks have won it 6 times in the last 10 years, winning 9 playoff games, going to 2 Super Bowls and winning 1 of them.

Hawk fans heard about it every year, it doesn't matter if you don't win the Super Bowl. The DenialNiner wouldn't be generous enough to call the Hawks average. After a 13-3 season and a Super Bowl loss the DenialNiner said the Hawks flat out sucked.

Buffalo? BUFFALO? THEY ACTUALLY WON THE AFCC GAMES. Why are you comparing the Niners choke jobs in their losses to the team that actually went to the Super Bowl? There is a BIG difference.

Heck.. overall the Niners haven't done anything more than the Cards have in the last 5 years. They won the division twice and lost a Super Bowl to an AFCN team.

 

[loafoftatupu]

Well, I appreciated it when this happened:

Oh man.. that is PRICELESS.

I wonder how many DenialNiners cringe when the NFL Network shows the "Seahawk fans, your Seahawks won the Super Bowl" merchandise commercial or just turn the channel altogether. They probably mute it until a genius like Sapp comes on and explains again why the Niners are the best team in the league because of their draft picks and the Seahawks are not because they aren't hungry anymore.

"You see Gary! He said the Niners are the best, they are the real champions! Now these guys know what they are talking about"

 

[Giedi]

:woohoo: There are some really smart and knowledgeable posters there in the WebZone, so I can see why she would cite that Board for some info.

Sure there are Giedi. But whenever they post anything remotely realistic they get thrashed on by the Legion of Drool.

I don't mind. The WebZone definitely is a place for crazy and insane 49er fans. I kind of like it that way. :thirishdrinkers: It's just the nature of that board. Now because of the recent excellence of the Seattle Team, that board holds a special kind of feeling for Seattle Fans and their team. Not denying it. It's reality. Seattle fans visiting should be honored for being beheld with such a unique feeling from the 49er fans. I know some Seattle fans do, but unfortunately most don't appreciate it. :mrgreen:

Well, I appreciated it when this happened:

I'm sure you did. :th2thumbs:

 

[Giedi]

I don't know about not winning anything for a long time. 3 NFC championships and a super bowl appearance isn't *average* so while the 49ers haven't won any super bowls recently, the consistency is there.

Whoa there Skipper.

3 NFC championships? Or making it to 3 Championship games?

I know for a fact that until 2011, making it to an NFC championship game and losing a Super Bowl equated to nothing according to Niner fans.

Winning the division was no accomplishment when the Hawks did it 4 years straight and 5 times 7 years. That was until 2011. The Hawks have won it 6 times in the last 10 years, winning 9 playoff gaImes, going to 2 Super Bowls and winning 1 of them.

Hawk fans heard about it every year, it doesn't matter if you don't win the Super Bowl. The DenialNiner wouldn't be generous enough to call the Hawks average. After a 13-3 season and a Super Bowl loss the DenialNiner said the Hawks flat out sucked.

Buffalo? BUFFALO? THEY ACTUALLY WON THE AFCC GAMES. Why are you comparing the Niners choke jobs in their losses to the team that actually went to the Super Bowl? There is a BIG difference.

Heck.. overall the Niners haven't done anything more than the Cards have in the last 5 years. They won the division twice and lost a Super Bowl to an AFCN team.

Well my buddie, the 49ers gave the eventual super bowl champions their toughest games leading up to the Super Bowl in my opinion. So while I agree appearing in a NFCCG isn't the same as winning it. It does beat simply winning a division. While appearing in a super bowl isn't the same as winning it. It beats going 7-9. Also, you really can't call a franchise doing a choke job if they've won the darn thing 5 times before they lost their first one. Patriots haven't won the super bowl recently either, but they have been pretty consistent in getting to the playoffs. I think that's important because it mean's the 49ers will be a thorn in all the NFC West teams side for a long time. Oh by the way how old is your coach? Ours is only 50 and has 3 NFC CG'S and a super bowl appearance on his resume in his 3rd season. :thirishdrinkers: one other thing - he did that with two different QB's.

 

[RedAlice]

Also, you really can't call a franchise doing a choke job if they've won the darn thing 5 times before they lost their first one.

You can call it a choke job for the last TWO decades without disrespecting the "5 rings," in fact, you can call it a choke job for the last twenty years and have total love and honor and admiration for the 5 times they've won the whole darn thing.

That is just fact.

 

[UK_Seahawk]

Well my buddie, the 49ers gave the eventual super bowl champions their toughest games leading up to the Super Bowl in my opinion. So while I agree appearing in a NFCCG isn't the same as winning it. It does beat simply winning a division. While appearing in a super bowl isn't the same as winning it. It beats going 7-9. Also, you really can't call a franchise doing a choke job if they've won the darn thing 5 times before they lost their first one. Patriots haven't won the super bowl recently either, but they have been pretty consistent in getting to the playoffs. I think that's important because it mean's the 49ers will be a thorn in all the NFC West teams side for a long time. Oh by the way how old is your coach? Ours is only 50 and has 3 NFC CG'S and a super bowl appearance on his resume in his 3rd season. :thirishdrinkers: one other thing - he did that with two different QB's.

It must kill you to know how much the Seahawks own you. Your posts on denialzone indicate just how much we are in your head. It's so delicious reading the stuff you say. I bet you can't sleep at night because of the anger sometimes.

 

[loafoftatupu]

Well my buddie, the 49ers gave the eventual super bowl champions their toughest games leading up to the Super Bowl in my opinion. So while I agree appearing in a NFCCG isn't the same as winning it. It does beat simply winning a division. While appearing in a super bowl isn't the same as winning it. It beats going 7-9. Also, you really can't call a franchise doing a choke job if they've won the darn thing 5 times before they lost their first one. Patriots haven't won the super bowl recently either, but they have been pretty consistent in getting to the playoffs. I think that's important because it mean's the 49ers will be a thorn in all the NFC West teams side for a long time. Oh by the way how old is your coach? Ours is only 50 and has 3 NFC CG'S and a super bowl appearance on his resume in his 3rd season. :thirishdrinkers: one other thing - he did that with two different QB's.

Oh, I see. So NOW it means something, but when the Hawks went to the Super Bowl, with a 13-3 record and Niner fans were saying that it doesn't matter if you don't win that was just BS right?

And when the Cards did the same thing it didn't matter either right?

 

[Giedi]

Well my buddie, the 49ers gave the eventual super bowl champions their toughest games leading up to the Super Bowl in my opinion. So while I agree appearing in a NFCCG isn't the same as winning it. It does beat simply winning a division. While appearing in a super bowl isn't the same as winning it. It beats going 7-9. Also, you really can't call a franchise doing a choke job if they've won the darn thing 5 times before they lost their first one. Patriots haven't won the super bowl recently either, but they have been pretty consistent in getting to the playoffs. I think that's important because it mean's the 49ers will be a thorn in all the NFC West teams side for a long time. Oh by the way how old is your coach? Ours is only 50 and has 3 NFC CG'S and a super bowl appearance on his resume in his 3rd season. :thirishdrinkers: one other thing - he did that with two different QB's.

Oh, I see. So NOW it means something, but when the Hawks went to the Super Bowl, with a 13-3 record and Niner fans were saying that it doesn't matter if you don't win that was just BS right?

And when the Cards did the same thing it didn't matter either right?

Not really, past history is past history. Whether it happened in February of 2014 or in 1982. It just so happens that history is tended to be celebrated if it is a significant event. While a super bowl win in February 2014 is a very memorable event, it pales into significance to events like D-Day, Pearl Harbor, 9-11, and *the Catch* :mrgreen: :thirishdrinkers:

 

[Giedi]

Well my buddie, the 49ers gave the eventual super bowl champions their toughest games leading up to the Super Bowl in my opinion. So while I agree appearing in a NFCCG isn't the same as winning it. It does beat simply winning a division. While appearing in a super bowl isn't the same as winning it. It beats going 7-9. Also, you really can't call a franchise doing a choke job if they've won the darn thing 5 times before they lost their first one. Patriots haven't won the super bowl recently either, but they have been pretty consistent in getting to the playoffs. I think that's important because it mean's the 49ers will be a thorn in all the NFC West teams side for a long time. Oh by the way how old is your coach? Ours is only 50 and has 3 NFC CG'S and a super bowl appearance on his resume in his 3rd season. :thirishdrinkers: one other thing - he did that with two different QB's.

It must kill you to know how much the Seahawks own you. Your posts on denialzone indicate just how much we are in your head. It's so delicious reading the stuff you say. I bet you can't sleep at night because of the anger sometimes.

Nope. I know that having been on both the losing and the winning sides of a particular season, what goes up generally comes down. Now I'm not predicting your Seattle team tanking, Russel Wilson alone at minimum, by himself, can make it an 8-8 season for the 'Hawks. But the thread is whether or not Seattle can be dethroned, and it is definitely an interesting debate about whether Seattle can repeat or not. I think it's a worthy discussion topic to explore because it touches on so many things, from rivals, to drafting to coaching to history and so on, it's a very rich debate topic in my opinion.