OL 2026

OL 2026

  • Top 5

    Votes: 11 21.2%
  • Top 10

    Votes: 30 57.7%
  • Top 15

    Votes: 9 17.3%
  • Top 20

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • Total voters
    52

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
14,887
Reaction score
10,461
Location
SoCal Desert
Last edited:

bileever

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Messages
3,074
Reaction score
4,400
If we can improve on our ranking last year of #15, I would take that. You can win with a line that's 15 or better. We spent so much time in the last few years at the bottom, and we all saw what that looked like.

I like the continuity of our line, every important player returning from last year. I like the re-signing of Josh Jones for depth, and getting Beau Stephens in the 5th round. I really liked that we were able to retain John Benton, who really came with Klint Kubiak from New Orleans. He also has long ties to the Kubiak family, so being able to keep him from going to Las Vegas was a big victory.

I'm hoping that one more year playing together, plus one more year with Benton will only improve on their ranking this year.

I would have liked it if they could have added a solid free agent guard. But a player like Alijah Vera-Tucker ended up being way too expensive.
 

bileever

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2022
Messages
3,074
Reaction score
4,400
You might be joking about Anthony Bradford, but he got one of the biggest performance-based bonuses this year. The performance-based bonuses come from a pool of money that is set aside by the collective bargaining agreement. The bonuses reward young players who are not highly compensated, and is based on a formula.

Bradford got his salary of $1.03 million doubled by getting a bonus of $1.098.


Drake Thomas was the other Seahawk to get a bonus under this system.
 

Wsumatt1982

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Messages
2,025
Reaction score
2,901
I say top 10. We saw much improvement across the entire line. Even Bradford. Like anyone else continuity and health will be the deciding factor but Benton is a damn good line coach
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
14,887
Reaction score
10,461
Location
SoCal Desert
You might be joking about Anthony Bradford, but he got one of the biggest performance-based bonuses this year. The performance-based bonuses come from a pool of money that is set aside by the collective bargaining agreement. The bonuses reward young players who are not highly compensated, and is based on a formula.

Bradford got his salary of $1.03 million doubled by getting a bonus of $1.098.


Drake Thomas was the other Seahawk to get a bonus under this system.
I have been talking up Bradford:
2024: https://www.seahawks.net/threads/anthony-bradford-didnt-suck-yesterday.199385/
2025: https://www.seahawks.net/threads/biggest-surprise-player-2025-anthony-bradford.202982/

I have been somewhat tough on Charles Cross:
2024: https://www.seahawks.net/threads/please-help-with-dissecting-the-game-of-charles-cross.199924/
2023: https://www.seahawks.net/threads/charles-cross-review-and-expectations.188117/
2022: https://www.seahawks.net/threads/do-we-need-to-worry-about-charles-cross.180757/
 

LeveeBreak

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
2,893
Reaction score
3,704
Location
Oregon Wine Region
We need to spend at least $50m on an ok, high potential, injured FA OL and add another $20m OL just to be safe.

JS Sucks!!!

Wait...2025 time warp...nm
 

MORGULON

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
10,351
Reaction score
7,113
Location
Spokane, Wa
I picked top 15. I hope the others on here with better optimism are correct . I could see it happening for sure but if they at least stay as good we might be ok.
They had a Superbowl Champion Offensive line last season.
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,648
Reaction score
2,199
Location
Bournemouth, UK
The Seahawks had a good O-Line in 2025. On paper the Seahawks haven't added or lost anyone significant. The Seahawks were probably top 5 in fewest snaps lost by O-Line starters in 2025. If they stay healthy it could be similar to last year. I think they have good back-ups at T & C but i'm not convinced about G. Few teams have quality players below #8 on the O-Line depth chart.
 

Hawkstud

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2025
Messages
285
Reaction score
359
Although they didn't add any other veteran o-linemen to the mix, they won the whole shooting match with the same horses that are still there.
The fact that they have continuity and another year of playing TOGETHER, I see them taking things to a whole another level.
My estimation? Top Seven...Whiskey ain't let me down or lied to me yet. ;-)
 
OP
OP
toffee

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
14,887
Reaction score
10,461
Location
SoCal Desert
The Seahawks had a good O-Line in 2025. On paper the Seahawks haven't added or lost anyone significant. The Seahawks were probably top 5 in fewest snaps lost by O-Line starters in 2025. If they stay healthy it could be similar to last year. I think they have good back-ups at T & C but i'm not convinced about G. Few teams have quality players below #8 on the O-Line depth chart.
We had non-stop OL issues in the Wilson and Geno era, and the same issues followed Wilson to Denver, and Geno to Vegas. Wilson's OL problem has been dissected by dot net experts, mainly too short and hero-ball. Geno? I watched a 3-minute Raiders' training camp clip, where 3 QBs stood in a line and threw to their receivers, no pass rush, just throw. In the entire 3 minutes, balls left Geno's hand a second or so slower than the other QBs.
 

Latest posts

Top