nolachawks
New member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 0
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... -14-season
There is a lot of things in this article that make me a little crazy.
1)"Everything I'm being told by people involved in the situation, nothing has changed with the Seahawks' plans to part ways with Marshawn Lynch after the season," Rapoport said.
I can't see anyone "involved in the situation" saying anything about this and not saying anything I guess could be perceived as nothing as changed :sarcasm_on:
2)However, aside from a few flashes from each, neither back has looked like they could be the workhorse.
There is no way to know this and the same media that were gushing about Michael are now down on him..
3) Seattle will move on from the back to save money, which they need for Russell Wilson's eventual big contract.
I think its been stated that we don't have to get rid of Lynch to sign Wilson.
I don't know what it was about that article, maybe its just the tone of it but it just rubbed me the wrong way.
There is a lot of things in this article that make me a little crazy.
1)"Everything I'm being told by people involved in the situation, nothing has changed with the Seahawks' plans to part ways with Marshawn Lynch after the season," Rapoport said.
I can't see anyone "involved in the situation" saying anything about this and not saying anything I guess could be perceived as nothing as changed :sarcasm_on:
2)However, aside from a few flashes from each, neither back has looked like they could be the workhorse.
There is no way to know this and the same media that were gushing about Michael are now down on him..
3) Seattle will move on from the back to save money, which they need for Russell Wilson's eventual big contract.
I think its been stated that we don't have to get rid of Lynch to sign Wilson.
I don't know what it was about that article, maybe its just the tone of it but it just rubbed me the wrong way.