EverydayImRusselin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2013
- Messages
- 2,171
- Reaction score
- 898
So you're telling me JS grabbed Clark, Lockett and Glowinski in this draft? Not bad.
Largent80":umpnrbmb said:I think Sweezy's replacement has just happened.
lobohawk":1i8n4thw said:Is his ceiling better than Britt's and could he replace him? Asking as Britt has shown more issues and am unsure if he's naturally suited to that position.
Kinda doubt Sweezy will be pushing for a big paycheck. Probably just a bit of bump over his initial contract.
lobohawk":26wxfb9d said:Kinda doubt Sweezy will be pushing for a big paycheck. Probably just a bit of bump over his initial contract.
McGruff":3ik2wwpm said:Hmmm . . . 8 games of postseason experience including 3 NFC championships and 2 Superbowls vs. 1 career start?
What to do, what to do . . .
hawknation2015":240whdum said:I think they will have a choice between re-signing the oft-injured Okung and the oft-inconsistent Sweezy. If they re-sign Sweezy and allow Okung to walk, which would save money, then Britt likely moves back to RT, Gilliam moves to his more natural LT position, and Glowinski finally makes the move to Left Guard in a competition with Sokoli. Either way, drafting the OT position should be a priority. They are much deeper at guard than they are at OT or C because of the last draft class.
kearly":1zkfvr3i said:What struck me watching Glowinsky was how much smaller he looks in the NFL compared to his college videos. Oddly enough, in a real NFL game he kind of reminded me of Drew Nowak.
I like Glow and thought he played above expectation for a first start. But I am pretty far away from thinking that his play is good enough to make a unique talent like Sweezy expendable.
At this point I would be a little surprised if either one of Sweezy or Okung leave in FA. Sweezy is Cable's favorite, Okung is very hard to replace, and neither one will likely command a king's ransom in UFA.