RussJames
New member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2013
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- 0
How is this even still an argument? I realize Russell is surrounded by a slightly better team and has one of the best backs in the game lined up behind him but, if you check the stats over the last two years Wilson is blowing Luck out of the water. Yet every broadcaster continues to say they'd take Luck over Wilson any day of the week. What the shit?!
.............LUCK.......WILSON..............
PASSING
GP >........ 29 ......... 29
YDS >...... 7,493 .... 5,989
CMP% >... 56.0 ...... 64.3
AVG >...... 6.87 ...... 8.28
TD >........ 42 ........ 49
INT >....... 26 ........ 17
FUM >...... 14 ........ 10
RAT >...... 80.3 ...... 103.0
DYAR > .... 729 ....... 1654
DVOA'12 > -5.1% .... 19.7%
DVOA'13 > 2.8% ..... 22.7%
RUSHING
ATT >...... 112 ....... 175
YDS >...... 591 ....... 947
AVG >...... 5.3 ........ 5.4
TD >........ 9 .......... 5
Is it because Luck was the 1st overall pick? Or because Wilson plays for the deep south Canadian team? Or because broadcasters were known to eat paint chips as kids? Why the bias?
.............LUCK.......WILSON..............
PASSING
GP >........ 29 ......... 29
YDS >...... 7,493 .... 5,989
CMP% >... 56.0 ...... 64.3
AVG >...... 6.87 ...... 8.28
TD >........ 42 ........ 49
INT >....... 26 ........ 17
FUM >...... 14 ........ 10
RAT >...... 80.3 ...... 103.0
DYAR > .... 729 ....... 1654
DVOA'12 > -5.1% .... 19.7%
DVOA'13 > 2.8% ..... 22.7%
RUSHING
ATT >...... 112 ....... 175
YDS >...... 591 ....... 947
AVG >...... 5.3 ........ 5.4
TD >........ 9 .......... 5
Is it because Luck was the 1st overall pick? Or because Wilson plays for the deep south Canadian team? Or because broadcasters were known to eat paint chips as kids? Why the bias?