MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 18,572
- Reaction score
- 1,496
No, I just straight-up got the quarter wrong. 
Anthony, bro. If you want to protect Wilson, seach out a board member who goes by 'TheRealDTM.' The only posts he ever makes are to bash Wilson.... Your welcome. [emoji6]volsunghawk":367wivg2 said:Anthony!":367wivg2 said:kidhawk":367wivg2 said:I was mainly aiming this at the post you were replying to Too often, people see a stat like this and don't really look into it as deeply as they should. I mean if we only looked at stats, Wilson would be a very mediocre qb.
Back On Topic....I don't know if Jackson is the answer. I wouldn't mind having a tall, experienced receiver in this offense. I always liked what Rice brought to the table when he was healthy, but I don't want to over pay either. We need our early draft picks to concentrate on other positions, especially Oline.
Yeah good on much but the only stats that makes Wilson look mediocre is yards and attempts, He looks really good in all the others
#5 in QB rating
#11 in complt%
#13 in tds
#2 in ints
#5 td/int raio
#14 in YPA
#1 qb ruishing
And he has played 1 less game then almost all the QBs a head of him. Also as an FYI few QBs are ahead of him in all those categories. example starting with QB rating those QBs ahead of him are Manning, Rodgers, Rivers, Romo. Of those Rodgers is the only one with less ints, of those 4 none have more rushing yards than Wilson, and only those 4 are ahead of him in other areas not counting yards and attempts. In fact Wilson is on pace to beat all of this positive stats form last year and lessen his ints significantly.
Last year RW was 63 complt%, 3357 yards, qb rating 101.2, 26tds, 9 ints, 8.25 ypa, 539 rushing yards 1 td
This year on pace for 66% complt%, 3443 yards, qb rating 101.9, 27 tds, 5 ints, 7.97 ypa, 872 rushing yards, 8 tds
And those stats would be better if not for the one bad game against Dallas. Barring another Dallas type game and if he just produces at his median level to date this year
2580 yards which would put him at 3871, complt% 68%, qb rating 104, 30 tds, 7 ints, 8.1 ypa, 727 rushing yards, 7 tds
that would put him top 10 in every category but yards and attempts.
Our Lord and Savior is under attack! Anthony! to! the! rescue!
Basis4day":2mahe9l3 said:kidhawk":2mahe9l3 said:Chapow":2mahe9l3 said:It's weird how some people act like just because the 'Hawks are looking at acquiring a 6'5" #1 WR that means that they are definitely not looking to improve other areas of the team.
I think Pete and John have made it abundantly clear that they are always looking to see how they can upgrade the team.
I think he means the fan reaction.
Yep.MontanaHawk05":1kdbpszu said:ImTheScientist":1kdbpszu said:I don't want to see the growth of Prich and Norwood suffer for Vjax. WR isn't our problem.
I would disagree. Don't get me wrong, I'm pretty impressed with the opportunistic fire of our current corps. They're underrated. But a true #1 is just a whole nother level.
That's surprising with AJ Green injured and Marvin Jones on IR. Gresham had a double-digit catch game just two weeks ago. I wouldn't be opposed to offering a 2 or 3 for him, if he's available.TheHawkster":23hs4zfc said:Germaine Gresham is being shopped right now.
I think I saw it on Yahoo Sports.
You would assume wrong based on the two games I watched. Twice I saw guys tackled for a loss where Jackson kind of waved them on through. He will do the standard receiver block on a CB when he is out wide, but on the few occasions he was in the slot he didn't have a lot of gumption to his blocks. Adequate at best, and no desire to really mix it up. They didn't run much to his side in the two I watched, PIT and NOR. I don't know if that is a tell or just the way a small sample size broke.pehawk":35jccja2 said:Anyone have a clue about his blocking? I'm assuming it's good since he's been a target for awhile.
He had a couple of drops I saw, and they were slants to the middle. Probably not a coincidence. He isn't a physical guy, neither was Rice tho.pehawk":1cekiovs said:Salvageable?
Thanks by the way.
Scottemojo":22o64wn2 said:Looking at your update, VJ didn't play the take less on a contract game in San Diego. I would think him redoing his deal here would be unlikely.
My point is that his catch % is a lifelong 50% range. Our guys career averages are all around 75% and guys who don't catch at that rate don't do so for more reasons than just their QB sucks. They drop more passes. Part of that is because they don't get separation and don't always win those jumps for the ball. It's not because they all have QB's who can't hit the side of barns.kidhawk":3le6v09w said:iigakusei":3le6v09w said:kidhawk":3le6v09w said:iigakusei":3le6v09w said:So VJax has 35 drops this year? That is terrible you are right :roll:
Targets is NOT = to Catchable passes.
I know that....it was a ridiculous comparison. Jeremy Maclin has almost identical catch to target stats - so I guess he sucks too.
I was mainly aiming this at the post you were replying to Too often, people see a stat like this and don't really look into it as deeply as they should. I mean if we only looked at stats, Wilson would be a very mediocre qb.
Back On Topic....I don't know if Jackson is the answer. I wouldn't mind having a tall, experienced receiver in this offense. I always liked what Rice brought to the table when he was healthy, but I don't want to over pay either. We need our early draft picks to concentrate on other positions, especially Oline.
Atradees":1mhnq906 said:Time to shore up the trenches. I get some middle of the road Olineman. Baldwin and kearse have been spectacular. They are not getting opportunities because this is the worst line in football. A guy like VJ would prob have same result as harvin eventually.