keasley45
Well-known member
We have spent an entire season going back and forth on Darnold and who and what he is for this team. I for one and worn out by it.
I think the way things are shaping up with the defenses that we may be playing for the remainder of our games (including post - season) coming into focus, rather than trying to guess what our passing game is going to do, i think the fact that we are still on the fence about it should shift focus to what our running game and defense can do to win us games from here on out.
This week against the 9ers- it's going to be a great barometer for our defense and if we are successful, may indicate the shape of our overall attack in the post season. It was great to see the explosiveness of the offense earlier in the season but I honestly think those performances are gone UNLESS we establish a dominant run game that forces defenses to come out of their 2 high looks against us. And honestly, given MMs defensive roots, I wouldn't be surprised if even when we establish a consistent ground game and loosen up D's, that he prefers the identity of the team to rely less on Sam and JSN and more on Charbs and Walker.
But after the 9ers and including the 9ers, is there a team in the NFC we SHOULDNT be able to pound the ground game on? I don't think there is. We lit up the Rams the 2nd time around and their D has been exposed a bit over the last several weeks.
The 9ers showed little ability to stop the Bears.
The Pack? They are too depleted to be considered formidable on D.
Carolina and Tampa? Nope
The Eagles aren't who they were last year, but still, given their experience can't be discounted.
Bears? They had nothing against the 9ers and overall, their D is ranked in the bottom half of the league
The 9ers Rush D is ranked 7th
Rams are 11th
GB are 16th
Carolina are 20th
Eagles are 22nd
Bears are 28th
Again, if we can run on the 9ers and slow their offense, it bodes well for us being able to just run on and bully whoever else we face in the NFC
It's when you look at the AFC and a potential SB matchup that you start to see dominant run defenses - defenses that will likely require us to have our passing game (Sam and Kubiak) to be a difference maker.
JAX and Den are the top 2 run defenses respectively
Houston is 4th
NE is 8th
Chargers are 9th
Ravens are 12th
Buffalo is 29th
We rank 3rd overall.
Out of the AFC teams we might be pitted against in the final stanza, I can see any of the top 5 teams making it. Houston and the Chargers are equally as formidable against the pass. But of those top defenses against the run, I would argue only the Texans, Pats, and Chargers have a formidable enough combo of QB play and rush defense to cause us real problems.
All that to say that it's entirely possible we keep our pass game buttoned down by design and try to just bully our way to the SB.
Win or lose Saturday, our team is entirely capable of riding that strategy to the SB before we have to truly require our passing game to win us a game.
I think the way things are shaping up with the defenses that we may be playing for the remainder of our games (including post - season) coming into focus, rather than trying to guess what our passing game is going to do, i think the fact that we are still on the fence about it should shift focus to what our running game and defense can do to win us games from here on out.
This week against the 9ers- it's going to be a great barometer for our defense and if we are successful, may indicate the shape of our overall attack in the post season. It was great to see the explosiveness of the offense earlier in the season but I honestly think those performances are gone UNLESS we establish a dominant run game that forces defenses to come out of their 2 high looks against us. And honestly, given MMs defensive roots, I wouldn't be surprised if even when we establish a consistent ground game and loosen up D's, that he prefers the identity of the team to rely less on Sam and JSN and more on Charbs and Walker.
But after the 9ers and including the 9ers, is there a team in the NFC we SHOULDNT be able to pound the ground game on? I don't think there is. We lit up the Rams the 2nd time around and their D has been exposed a bit over the last several weeks.
The 9ers showed little ability to stop the Bears.
The Pack? They are too depleted to be considered formidable on D.
Carolina and Tampa? Nope
The Eagles aren't who they were last year, but still, given their experience can't be discounted.
Bears? They had nothing against the 9ers and overall, their D is ranked in the bottom half of the league
The 9ers Rush D is ranked 7th
Rams are 11th
GB are 16th
Carolina are 20th
Eagles are 22nd
Bears are 28th
Again, if we can run on the 9ers and slow their offense, it bodes well for us being able to just run on and bully whoever else we face in the NFC
It's when you look at the AFC and a potential SB matchup that you start to see dominant run defenses - defenses that will likely require us to have our passing game (Sam and Kubiak) to be a difference maker.
JAX and Den are the top 2 run defenses respectively
Houston is 4th
NE is 8th
Chargers are 9th
Ravens are 12th
Buffalo is 29th
We rank 3rd overall.
Out of the AFC teams we might be pitted against in the final stanza, I can see any of the top 5 teams making it. Houston and the Chargers are equally as formidable against the pass. But of those top defenses against the run, I would argue only the Texans, Pats, and Chargers have a formidable enough combo of QB play and rush defense to cause us real problems.
All that to say that it's entirely possible we keep our pass game buttoned down by design and try to just bully our way to the SB.
Win or lose Saturday, our team is entirely capable of riding that strategy to the SB before we have to truly require our passing game to win us a game.