Is Anthony Richardson worth pick 5?

gmor

Active member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
298
Reaction score
77
Location
Oak Harbor, WA
The Seahawks are going to draft a DE. Richardson is a "boom or bust" candidate. Kiper is probably right that some QB-desperate team will take the gamble on him, but I hope it is not the Seahawks.
They will scrub the QBs first and only move off of that if none of the ones they really like fall to 5. Never a better opportunity to resolve this position. Lots of DL to be had later.
 

gmor

Active member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
298
Reaction score
77
Location
Oak Harbor, WA
I'd make a significant bet that four QBs go in the top 8.

And yes. Richardson is worth that pick.

This mythical "DE" people keep bringing up is every bit as risky. Will Anderson won't be there. There are serious question marks with the other prospects, and a few of them (McDonald and Wilson, namely) will need every bit as much time developing as Richardson will.
We are thick at edge. The wonder i have is whether one of them could move to the middle successfully. Mafe maybe.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
1,283
Location
Sequim
They will scrub the QBs first and only move off of that if none of the ones they really like fall to 5. Never a better opportunity to resolve this position. Lots of DL to be had later.
I don’t believe that. The Seahawks are going with Geno and draft a DE at #5. They might take a developmental QB at #20, but probably not.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
1,283
Location
Sequim
I think it depends on what our goals are. Richardson the second coming (but less developed initially) of Cam Newton?
He could just as likely be a bust. Again, where’s the production? He has 17/9 TD/int ratio and a 54% completion percentage. That’s awful for top-5 draft pick. Not happening.
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
11,379
Reaction score
6,523
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
He could just as likely be a bust. Again, where’s the production? He has 17/9 TD/int ratio and a 54% completion percentage. That’s awful for top-5 draft pick. Not happening.
It is awful, and people are going to keep bringing up Josh Allen, but those guys become Kyle Boller or Akili Smith much more often. I love toolsy QBs, so I won't complain if we take him, but I don't have the greatest of confidence that he's going to end up being worthy of a pick that high.
 

James in PA

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
6,640
Reaction score
7,657
I like all 4 of these top QB's. At first, I was down on Young because of his size. But the kid is just too good of a QB and a person. Sees the field so well. Sign me up for anyone who reminds you of PM. Been on the Richardson bandwagon since day one. Yes he's a bit of a project but such a freakish athlete. Cannot overlook that upside. Stroud is another great kid who has all the tools and is ready to start sooner rather than later. With Levis I love the moxie, cannon for an arm and that quick release.

Sure, there may be no sure-thing Burrow, Lawrence types in this group coming out, but I see some Allen, Herbert potential for sure. And if we do go elsewhere with that first pick, please take Hooker later on. He'd be right up there with these guys had it not been for the injury.
 

ElvisInBlue

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 5, 2022
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
799
I don’t believe that. The Seahawks are going with Geno and draft a DE at #5. They might take a developmental QB at #20, but probably not.
What QB will be there at 20?

Beyond the positional value angle, consider the financial choice:

1) rookie contract QB @ 4-7 million per year (top ten pick)
2) Tier 2 vet QB @ 40+ million per (reported asking price of Smith & Jones).

That kind of value will push any of the projected top 4 QBs off the board before pick 20 and no one outside the top 4 is worth the investment.
 

nwHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
4,327
Reaction score
1,659
The thing about this draft - it’s not stacked so expecting an elite QB prospect to drop to #20 is unlikely. Nothing is a sure pick, roll the dice.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
1,283
Location
Sequim
What QB will be there at 20?

Beyond the positional value angle, consider the financial choice:

1) rookie contract QB @ 4-7 million per year (top ten pick)
2) Tier 2 vet QB @ 40+ million per (reported asking price of Smith & Jones).

That kind of value will push any of the projected top 4 QBs off the board before pick 20 and no one outside the top 4 is worth the investment.
If nobody drops to 20, that’s fine. Take the top non/QB on your board. Maybe a center. That makes more sense. Build up the OL and draft Geno replacement in 2024.
 
OP
OP
FrodosFinger

FrodosFinger

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
2,565
Reaction score
2,626
A 55% completion percentage is nothing to write home about but when you’re 6-5” 240 and can fly it certainly opens up the playbook
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,285
Reaction score
2,404
I hope that Pete and John stay patient with the QB position. Geno's asking price is likely north of what P&J are willing to spend.

Forget about Geno. I'd rather we re-sign Drew Lock and pay him what Geno made last year... and use this year's draft capital to rebuild the Dline, bolster the Oline with a quality Center and Guard, and strengthen the LB room, which is way too thin right now.
 

NoGain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2022
Messages
3,164
Reaction score
3,306
The Seahawks pretty consistently overpay for their own. How many times have any of us said to ourselves...we gave them that much?...who else would have? I don't want them to pay Geno an amount that seems way over market value. I don't know exactly what that number is, but 30+ million seems too high for me, even on a contract that we can move on from after a couple of years.

But I'm prepared for a number bigger than I would like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbq

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
517
Reaction score
580
The Seahawks pretty consistently overpay for their own. How many times have any of us said to ourselves...we gave them that much?...who else would have? I don't want them to pay Geno an amount that seems way over market value. I don't know exactly what that number is, but 30+ million seems too high for me, even on a contract that we can move on from after a couple of years.

But I'm prepared for a number bigger than I would like.
I'm expecting him to sign with the team with the biggest offer, which may not be the Seahawks. This is Geno's one and likely only shot at a big payday so I expect him to take full advantage of it. I certainly would if I were him.
 

NoGain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2022
Messages
3,164
Reaction score
3,306
I'm expecting him to sign with the team with the biggest offer, which may not be the Seahawks. This is Geno's one and likely only shot at a big payday so I expect him to take full advantage of it. I certainly would if I were him.
In theory, I agree with you. But what team is going to pay him huge bucks on the open market if he gets there? Jets? Carolina? Atlanta? I know it only takes one team, but I have a hard time convincing myself that another team is going to offer him a 30-35 million dollar contract. Who's to say that his open market value isn't more in the 20-25 million range? We're talking a 32 year old journeyman QB with one remarkable year as a starter that kind of came out of the blue and caught most everyone by surprise.

I don't know. We'll see.
 

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
517
Reaction score
580
In theory, I agree with you. But what team is going to pay him huge bucks on the open market if he gets there? Jets? Carolina? Atlanta? I know it only takes one team, but I have a hard time convincing myself that another team is going to offer him a 30-35 million dollar contract. Who's to say that his open market value isn't more in the 20-25 million range? We're talking a 32 year old journeyman QB with one remarkable year as a starter that kind of came out of the blue and caught most everyone by surprise.

I don't know. We'll see.
Who knows, you may be right. And if you are, I expect him to sign that contract with Seattle. However, the franchise tag this year for a QB is 32.146 million, which to me is the floor for a pro bowl QB. This is too big of a cap hit for most (all?) teams, so turn a big chunk of that into a signing bonus and add three years to the contract to spread out the cap hit. But to get Geno to sign this the guaranteed money will need to be significantly over 32 mil. Now throw in the fact that desperate NFL teams tend to do stupid things, especially with respect to QBs, and Geno ends up with a guaranteed two-year contract worth 37 to 40 mil per year.

As you pointed out, this is all conjecture. What I can say is that if I'm right, I hope the contract is NOT with the Seahawks.
 

Bear-Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
1,283
Location
Sequim
if they take a center at #20, i will side with antifa and seattle will burn


... in minecraft ofc
Well, I said take the top non/QB on the Seahawks board. By #20 there will have already been a big run on defensive linemen. I imagine interior offensive line is pretty high on the needs list, so guard/center might happen at #20. Let’s just say I’m taking the best DL/OL available.
Is that a problem?
 

Double Tribble

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
2,271
Reaction score
1,886
If nobody drops to 20, that’s fine. Take the top non/QB on your board. Maybe a center. That makes more sense. Build up the OL and draft Geno replacement in 2024.
How? We're not going to be picking #5 again, and trading up more than a few spots means giving away the farm. DL can be had much easier than a rookie qb1.
 
Top