themunn":2ryfc20e said:HawkWow":2ryfc20e said:"It is supposed to be snowy and freezing according to long-term forecasts".
This part, to me, is ridiculous. Yes folks, I know..."it's football", but there should be no advantage for any team over another in deciding a championship. What if SD fought their way to the SB, but had to play GB in the snow?
Further, such weather just complicates the logistics of everything, from the media to the fans, etc. A big reason I do not plan to be in attendance.
But surely Green Bay are actually disadvantaged by the fact that they have to play in the snow several times during the regular season?
Yes, you can look at any one off and say Green Bay have the advantage of playing a team not used to playing in snow, but they have to do it regularly should either mean it's A: tough for them, or B: unfair that they have to play in a warmer climate than they are used to
IMO if you can't win the game because of a little snow you shouldn't be the NFL champion
Good points (real good) but if GB plays in the snow regularly, would doing so actually be a disadvantage for them? I keep getting flashbacks of that terrible Apple cup that doomed my Dawgs...so don't mind me. But we'd all hate to see it doom our Hawks, even though we are built for rain, sleet or snow. We're the frikin mailmen of the NFL.