If you had to pick only one to re-sign Thomas or Sherman?

If you had to pick only one to re-sign Thomas or Sherman?

  • Earl Thomas

    Votes: 169 84.1%
  • Richard Sherman

    Votes: 32 15.9%

  • Total voters
    201

VancitySeahawk

New member
Joined
Sep 28, 2009
Messages
978
Reaction score
0
Lets pretend for whatever reason the front office has re-signed all of our guys except for Earl Thomas and Richard Sherman. Lets also pretend that there is only room for us to sign one of the two. If it came down to this, who would you rather re-sign?
 

12th_Bob

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
1,977
Reaction score
41
Thomas, can't get a free safety of that caliber without tanking hard for the draft (still a lottery if you end up with a stud like Thomas) and forget about free agency.

Although, Sherman is pretty much either #1 or at least no worse than #2 CB in the league either.
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,274
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Orlando, FL...for good.
Ugh! Thomas, he helps other members of the defense more than Sherman does...But man...I don't want to lose Sherman. :(

I don't even want this choice to ever come up. Ever.
 

seahawk 17

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Thomas hands down. He's the QB of the defense. Constantly blows up plays before they start even though he's 12-15 yards off the line.
 

Hawknballs

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
838
Thomas because his range is what makes Kam work. Without Thomas, Kam has to be come a standard strong safety. But he's not one. And we already signed Kam
 

tooshort

Active member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
1,111
Reaction score
2
Location
Enjoying a life sentence in the Clink.
I'd prefer them both to be lifetime Hawks, but I can easily say ET (especially with the 4-6 million per year gap between the probable asking prices).

If it's "pick one to re-sign at $10 mil per" the waters become quite a bit muddier.
 

SeaTown81

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, WA
Thomas all the way. He's more important to the defense overall. Safeties tend to have longer careers as top performers than cb's do. And he'll be much cheaper to sign.

Pretty surprised at how one sided the poll is so far. I'm impressed.
 

Happy

New member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
8,656
Reaction score
0
Earl is what makes the legion of boom greater than the sum of it's parts.
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,274
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Orlando, FL...for good.
While I did vote for Earl, Earl himself ALSO benefits from knowing it's very unlikely that either corner will get burned. It allows Earl more freedom, too; kind of a mutually increasing benefit between the corners and Thomas.

Just thought I'd throw that out there. You wouldn't see Earl crashing into the line of scrimmage as often or as quickly if we had two average corners.
 

Hawknballs

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
838
It is hard because they are unique talents but Thomas' ability to cover the field makes him irreplaceable. He does things that other safeties simply are not physically and mentally able to do.

Sherman does some great things but they aren't unique to him, he just does them frequently and consistently. Another CB is going to be a drop off but they will on occassion be able to do the things sherman does.

There are no safeties that can do what thomas does.
 

HawkFan72

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
16,570
Reaction score
1
Location
Bay Area, CA
Earl Thomas.

I hate to say it, but CB is a system position for Carroll. He can plug anyone in there who fits his system and they will do well. For example, look at all the no-name CBs who played for him at USC and look how many CBs have suddenly found success playing for us.

Did anyone notice a significant drop-off when Browner was out? No, because all the guys on the team fit Carroll's system and they can perform at a high level in it.

Sherman is our best CB, and there would be somewhat of a drop-off if he were gone just because he fits Carroll's system so PERFECTLY, but it would not be devastating.

Thomas, however, plays a very critical position in Carroll's defense and would be harder to replace. It's why Carroll went after a safety in the 1st round of his first draft (remember there were rumors that he wanted Eric Berry with his first pick, but he was gone before we took Okung) and why he has never drafted a CB before round 4.
 

SeaTown81

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, WA
HawkFan72":2ozfys19 said:
Earl Thomas.

I hate to say it, but CB is a system position for Carroll. He can plug anyone in there who fits his system and they will do well. For example, look at all the no-name CBs who played for him at USC and look how many CBs have suddenly found success playing for us.

Did anyone notice a significant drop-off when Browner was out? No, because all the guys on the team fit Carroll's system and they can perform at a high level in it.

Sherman is our best CB, and there would be somewhat of a drop-off if he were gone just because he fits Carroll's system so PERFECTLY, but it would not be devastating.

Thomas, however, plays a very critical position in Carroll's defense and would be harder to replace. It's why Carroll went after a safety in the 1st round of his first draft (remember there were rumors that he wanted Eric Berry with his first pick, but he was gone before we took Okung) and why he has never drafted a CB before round 4.

Great point. Well said.
 

tdlabrie

Active member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
1,189
Reaction score
0
seahawk 17":gplfma3t said:
Thomas hands down. He's the QB of the defense. Constantly blows up plays before they start even though he's 12-15 yards off the line.
This.
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,274
Reaction score
1,146
Location
Orlando, FL...for good.
Interesting point of view, HawkFan72. Can you explain how being exceptional at man coverage is a "system position"? It seems to me like it's kind of the opposite. A lot of corners can't play man very well, or better than above average.
 

Seahawks Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
13,459
Reaction score
3,421
HawkFan72":og7hifhv said:
Earl Thomas.

I hate to say it, but CB is a system position for Carroll. He can plug anyone in there who fits his system and they will do well. For example, look at all the no-name CBs who played for him at USC and look how many CBs have suddenly found success playing for us.

Did anyone notice a significant drop-off when Browner was out? No, because all the guys on the team fit Carroll's system and they can perform at a high level in it.

Sherman is our best CB, and there would be somewhat of a drop-off if he were gone just because he fits Carroll's system so PERFECTLY, but it would not be devastating.

Thomas, however, plays a very critical position in Carroll's defense and would be harder to replace. It's why Carroll went after a safety in the 1st round of his first draft (remember there were rumors that he wanted Eric Berry with his first pick, but he was gone before we took Okung) and why he has never drafted a CB before round 4.

I've thought about this too. And I've said before that I think if Browner or any other piece of our secondary plays for another team, their level of play will drop off. Our coaches do a phenomenal job.
 

White Knight

New member
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
Location
Ogden, UT
Thomas is the straw that stirs the drink on our defense. Great safety play is much less replaceable than great corner play.
 

-The Glove-

New member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
7,689
Reaction score
0
Earl Thomas no doubt. I love Sherman but PC has hit on CB's more frequently than a legit single-high free safety. He cleans up so much in the back field, I don't see how he could be replaced
 
Top