Hawks46":34wnaf1p said:
Sgt. Largent":34wnaf1p said:
The_Z_Man":34wnaf1p said:
If he had the grasp of the game that he pretends to, he'd have been an all time QB, and gone into coaching.
C'mon, lots of great players weren't cut out to coach..........and lots of mediocre players have made great coaches.
These two things aren't connected at all.
Now Millen to me is the human equivalent of watching paint dry...........but him not being a great NFL QB has nothing to do with his football IQ.
Dilfer is also a great analyst, but wasn't a great QB.
You can understand the game and grasp it just fine. Now do it with 300 lb guys running at you full speed and get it all right in under 3 seconds. Then throw in athleticism on top of being smart. Some guys can't process it quick enough, but can analyze tape all day long.
Perhaps you are referring to his amazing analysis of how the Seahawks D had no chance against the all time great Denver Offense in 48, or the fact that he thought Krapper would be mentioned right up there with Steve Young and Joe Montana in the 49ers pantheon, or....
Some players understand the game, but can't coach because they don't know how to teach, they usually end up in front office roles. Ozzie Newsome comes to mind, along with several scouts.
Some players don't have a total grasp of the game, but can go into coaching because they really know how to teach. They make great position coaches... but the problem is, they usually fail as Head Coaches because of their overall lack of knowledge in all facets of football.. (Mike Singeltary is a good example).
Some are both and make amazing coaches.
Some look good on TV and have a good speaking voice... so... Trent Dilfer.
That's my story, and I'm sticking with it.