Tical21
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 5,542
- Reaction score
- 89
Once upon a time, I would have argued this premise also. In reality, it isn't correct. We've seen too many guys come back from ACL's and be fine. We've seen guys come back from shoulder, thumb, foot injuries, and be fine. We've seen guys come back from concussions and be fine. Heck, a quarterback recently had neck fusion surgery and then received one of the largest contracts in NFL history.hawk45":oez1e8g1 said:Tical21":oez1e8g1 said:He's forsaking 1-2 million in interest on the portion of the signing bonus he would get this year plus risking the gap between any guarantees and his insurance amount, on the incredibly slim chance he would have a career-ending injury, which hasn't happened to a QB in decades.
Tical, although a career ending injury is a possibility, you'll note I didn't mention that possibility. Instead, I raised the specter of an injury limiting his mobility. I direct you to Michael Vick and RGIII as very recent examples of such injuries to mobile quarterbacks, although Russell is certainly much more intelligent about avoiding collision.
You don't have to go to Vick or RGIII however to support this point; Aaron Rodgers sustained an injury that limited his mobility before the NFCC. And Rodgers uses his legs far less, albeit very effectively.
Rodgers has proven he can function at an elite level with diminished mobility. Russ has not, in fact our offense has, for long stretches, been DOA when Wilson isn't choosing to keep the ball regularly, as the late PE pointed out often and correctly.
Focusing on the career-ender to the exclusion of other, far more regular mobility-limiting injuries, is a curious and flawed decision.
I want to add that most NFL QBs experience a year where injuries or other factors derail their productivity. Again, Lynch being at the end of his career, the possibility of getting a nick, turf toe, anything that limits his mobility hurts Russ far more than other quarterbacks.
I agree with Sgt. Largent that NFL QBs likely lean towards believing it will not happen to them in a contract year. So I don't say my analysis means Russ will see things from my perspective. I just believe they would be well-served to remember the possibility if the difference is 1-2 million as they play on a championship caliber team.
He could very well gamble against injury or fall-off and come up aces, and I'd be thrilled with that scenario if it means a ring next year, as would we all, even if it does mean paying him money that could hamstring us as a consequence. After two rings, I'll be happy to watch Russ scamper around and make magic for the next decade.
There realistically isn't an injury out there that Russell could get that would have a major impact on his dollar value. If he tears an ACL, the Seahawks are still in the same boat. Sign him or not? If they don't, some team will give him a ridiculous contract. In order for his value to take a hit from an injury, he would have to return from the injury and prove ineffective. There just isn't enough time before the decision must be made on him for this to happen.
Diseases, losing eyeballs, losing limbs, or maybe a severe head injury, etc., are the only things that would keep Russell from cashing in. There is realistically a far less than 1% chance that any injury would prevent him from seeing top dollar. The chance is so insignificant that it isn't worth considering.
No matter what happens this season, he'll still be a young QB with an unparalleled resume, and those types of people get a crapton of coin.