Graham

[seahawksny]

I apologize as its probably been posted. I just havent paid attention.

Playing this week?

 

[nIdahoSeahawk]

Pete said yesterday they're taking it day to day and will make a final decision Friday. He said Graham is working hard to get back and is doing fantastic, but they just want to make sure he's good to go. Typical PC answer, I'm betting come Friday they'll either say he's out or that he's a game time decision.

 

[Overseasfan]

Maybe week 2 but not yet against the Dolphins.

 

[seahawksny]

Pete said yesterday they're taking it day to day and will make a final decision Friday. He said Graham is working hard to get back and is doing fantastic, but they just want to make sure he's good to go. Typical PC answer, I'm betting come Friday they'll either say he's out or that he's a game time decision.

Pete Always optimistic, even when not realistic. To me, that means not this week. I could be wrong though

 

[MontanaHawk05]

Pete will probably want to keep him away from the Rams. Week 3 at the earliest, I'd guess.

 

[HawkGA]

Pete will probably want to keep him away from the Rams. Week 3 at the earliest, I'd guess.

Playing him this week and giving him a week off next week might not be a bad idea. Let the body get used to things a little bit and keep him away from the Rams, yet keep the Rams guessing.

Oh, and no, I don't actually expect that to happen.

 

[Seymour]

Pete will probably want to keep him away from the Rams. Week 3 at the earliest, I'd guess.

Makes sense, because "we can beat the Rams with our hands tied behind our backs." Besides, "these games don't count like the end of the year games."

 

[MontanaHawk05]

Pete will probably want to keep him away from the Rams. Week 3 at the earliest, I'd guess.

Makes sense, because "we can beat the Rams with our hands tied behind our backs." Besides, "these games don't count like the end of the year games."

That and out-of-conference games aren't weighted as heavily when it comes to the end-of-season tiebreakers.

 

[Sports Hernia]

If he is healthy and on the 53 man roster, play him, if not keep him off the 53 until he is ready to play.

 

[Largent80]

My guess is he won't play.

 

[kf3339]

If he is healthy and on the 53 man roster, play him, if not keep him off the 53 until he is ready to play.

:ditto:

 

[Hawks46]

Pete will probably want to keep him away from the Rams. Week 3 at the earliest, I'd guess.

Playing him this week and giving him a week off next week might not be a bad idea. Let the body get used to things a little bit and keep him away from the Rams, yet keep the Rams guessing.

Oh, and no, I don't actually expect that to happen.

Actually a pretty good idea. I'm with Montana....I'd just like to see him stay away from the Rams.

 

[HawkerD]

If he is healthy and on the 53 man roster, play him, if not keep him off the 53 until he is ready to play.

:ditto:

How do you put him off the 53???? IR? Cut? That all I can think of? Maybe you mean off the 45 active roster?

 

[dogorama]

Pete will probably want to keep him away from the Rams. Week 3 at the earliest, I'd guess.

Makes sense, because "we can beat the Rams with our hands tied behind our backs." Besides, "these games don't count like the end of the year games."

Excellent

 

[Basis4day]

If he is healthy and on the 53 man roster, play him, if not keep him off the 53 until he is ready to play.

Too late for that. At had he been on PUP to start the year he would have sat 6 games, healthy or not.

But only 46 players can be active on gameday, so someone on the active roster has to sit regardless.

 

[King Dog]

The Rams are sorry bishes that drafted a qb with the number one pick that won't even be active for the opener. If Graham is ready to go - play him.

 

[StaffAmerica74]

Petes comments remind me of the Percy Harvin days of 2013.

 

[kf3339]

If he is healthy and on the 53 man roster, play him, if not keep him off the 53 until he is ready to play.

:ditto:

How do you put him off the 53???? IR? Cut? That all I can think of? Maybe you mean off the 45 active roster?

No, I'm pretty sure Sports Hernia meant that he should have been on the PUP to start and only taken off if completely ready to practice and play to start the season. Right now there is a very good chance he will sit off the 45 man active roster for one or two games.

That's how I took his posts comment.

 

[seahawksny]

The Rams are sorry bishes that drafted a qb with the number one pick that won't even be active for the opener. If Graham is ready to go - play him.

Yeah, and Nick Foles is a Hall of Famer.
How many games did we win against them last year??

I really dont understand people overlooking them.

Anyone who thinks that the Rams two games arent tougher or as tough as going to NE, GB, Carolina at home, has really not been paying attention.

 

[gowazzu02]

The Rams are sorry bishes that drafted a qb with the number one pick that won't even be active for the opener. If Graham is ready to go - play him.

Yeah, and Nick Foles is a Hall of Famer.
How many games did we win against them last year??

I really dont understand people overlooking them.

Anyone who thinks that the Rams two games arent tougher or as tough as going to NE, GB, Carolina at home, has really not been paying attention.

Rams game, early in the season. Oh btw the first game in LA in what 25 years? Frankly im down right concerned