Going for 2. Not challenging the obvious conversion.

[Seahawks Guy]

Characteristics of bad coaches. Not a good sign.

 

[knownone]

Yeah. That's rough. I don't blame Macdonald, but someone has to be on top of that.

 

[kidhawk]

Id have to get a rules check but I do t know how challenges work on conversions. Might be up to the booth

 

[jman316]

C’mon he’s a rook. Gotta learn the hard way sometimes.

 

[Smellyman]

Scoring place are supposed to be automatic review.

 

[DarkVictory23]

Well, first, going for 2 was a questionable, not 'bad', call.

Also, this is his 4th game. It only means something if he doesn't learn from it.

 

[cymatica]

Characteristics of bad coaches. Not a good sign.

Lol okay

 

[JPatera76]

Scoring place are supposed to be automatic review.

bingo they chose to ignore it the NFL itself didnt follow its own "procedure"

 

[strohmin]

I mean the guy probably was distracted thinking about how much his defense sucked today

 

[Followthelegion]

Scoring place are supposed to be automatic review.

But it wasn't a scoring play.

 

[Seahawks Guy]

Scoring place are supposed to be automatic review.

They didn't score, though. Ruled incomplete.

Lol okay

There's supposed to a coach reviewing the plays and telling coach to challenge or not.

Macdonald is supposed to understand that going for 2 there isn't to our advantage. Why didn't he understand that? I've never coached in the NFL, yet somehow I know that.

 

[Ozzy]

You don’t though. Analytics say it made sense. If they call it right its awesome, not his fault

 

[Seahawks Guy]

You don’t though. Analytics say it made sense. If they call it right its awesome, not his fault

Analytics aren't as smart as me.

 

[Ozzy]

That’s fair lol