cymatica
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,293
- Reaction score
- 4,189
Don't know if it's true but it has to be, at least in the last couple years. I don't know how he can keep doing that
Removes risk of fumble/strip as wellWhat is wrong with intentional grounding? He’s going to take the sack otherwise. Same outcome either way. At least with the grounding, there is the chance that there is a receiver somewhere in the area, and it goes as an incompletion.
4th Most last year. Tied with Mahomes and Lamar. Minny #1.Don't know if it's true but it has to be, at least in the last couple years. I don't know how he can keep doing that
Oh, man. Tied with those awful QBs?4th Most last year. Tied with Mahomes and Lamar. Minny #1.
In 2022 it says 2nd most.
I'll have to watch it back, but that pressure felt fast compared to what was needed on that concept.He needs to get rid of it sooner multiple times. It’s on him. The last one this game was on him but who cares because he threw a dart for a touchdown lol
It’s an area he can improve on for sure, ok to admit it
Not a coincidence. Intentional grounding when dead-to-rights isn't a negative choice. It's a savvy one.Oh, man. Tied with those awful QBs?
Right to practice squad. Right away.
It’s why I never killed Russ for trying to extend plays, but ts true you want your guy making plays. Sometimes situationally though you have to throw it away.I'll have to watch it back, but that pressure felt fast compared to what was needed on that concept.
Sacks happen. We act like they're all avoidable. At the end of the day, we WANT our QB to hang in the pocket strong and look for the open guy.
LmaoOh, man. Tied with those awful QBs?
Right to practice squad. Right away.