vin.couve12
New member
I posted this in another post, but I thought some of you would appreciate it.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/splits/_/n ... e-seahawks
Passing formation statistics:
BY OFFENSIVE FORMATION ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
Shotgun 40 25 62.5 235 6.0 0.0 24 1 2.5 1 2.5 2 5 77.1
2 Backs Split 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
I-formation 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
Lone Setback 34 20 58.8 173 5.6 0.0 24 1 2.9 1 2.9 3 18 72.1
BY WR FORMATION ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
2 Wide Receivers 3 2 66.7 5 6.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 13 82.6
3 Wide Receivers 24 14 58.3 127 5.5 0.0 24 1 4.2 1 4.2 2 5 70.1
4+ Wide Receivers 15 10 66.7 101 6.7 0.0 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 85.7
BY TE FORMATION ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
0 Tight Ends 13 8 61.5 81 6.2 0.0 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 79.3
1 Tight End 27 17 63.0 158 6.0 0.0 24 1 3.7 1 3.7 2 5 76.6
2 Tight Ends 1 0 0.0 -13 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 13 39.6
3+ Tight Ends 2 2 100.0 14 7.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 95.8
Running formation statistics.
BY OFFENSIVE FORMATION ATT YDS YD/A LONG 20+ TD YDS/G FUM FUML 1DN
Shotgun 18 69 3.8 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2 Backs Split 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
I-formation 5 9 1.8 6 0 0 0.0 1 1 1
Lone Setback 22 89 4.0 12 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
BY WR FORMATION ATT YDS YD/A LONG 20+ TD YDS/G FUM FUML 1DN
2 Wide Receivers 9 36 4.0 12 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
3 Wide Receivers 14 59 4.2 11 0 0 0.0 1 1 1
4+ Wide Receivers 5 16 3.2 9 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
BY TE FORMATION ATT YDS YD/A LONG 20+ TD YDS/G FUM FUML 1DN
0 Tight Ends 6 10 1.7 6 0 0 0.0 1 1 0
1 Tight End 14 67 4.8 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 1
2 Tight Ends 12 35 2.9 12 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
3+ Tight Ends 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
These stats are always a good case study in terms of what it shows when we're in certain formations. We have tendencies and kind of telegraph what we're going to do when we come out in 2 WR sets or even 2 TE sets.
It's been the same in previous years and what it shows is that the OC is lacking in his mixture of how he calls plays and, specifically, what he shows in his tendencies per formation. This can severely tip the hand to any educated defender and especially so with defenders who are good at recognizing patterns (not WR patterns, but geometric/mathematical/etc).
EDIT:
To add to this, you show tendencies in formations alone, yes, but there are also many players who can memorize what plays you run out of each formation and therefore give themselves options for how they are going to react per formation. They'll look for pre-snap keys and anything else that will help them to know what's coming. You can't just simply react in the NFL. That's where it really does become NFL (Not For Long).
http://www.espn.com/nfl/team/splits/_/n ... e-seahawks
Passing formation statistics:
BY OFFENSIVE FORMATION ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
Shotgun 40 25 62.5 235 6.0 0.0 24 1 2.5 1 2.5 2 5 77.1
2 Backs Split 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
I-formation 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
Lone Setback 34 20 58.8 173 5.6 0.0 24 1 2.9 1 2.9 3 18 72.1
BY WR FORMATION ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
2 Wide Receivers 3 2 66.7 5 6.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 13 82.6
3 Wide Receivers 24 14 58.3 127 5.5 0.0 24 1 4.2 1 4.2 2 5 70.1
4+ Wide Receivers 15 10 66.7 101 6.7 0.0 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 85.7
BY TE FORMATION ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A YDS/G LONG TD TD% INT INT% SACK YDSL RATE
0 Tight Ends 13 8 61.5 81 6.2 0.0 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 79.3
1 Tight End 27 17 63.0 158 6.0 0.0 24 1 3.7 1 3.7 2 5 76.6
2 Tight Ends 1 0 0.0 -13 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 13 39.6
3+ Tight Ends 2 2 100.0 14 7.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 95.8
Running formation statistics.
BY OFFENSIVE FORMATION ATT YDS YD/A LONG 20+ TD YDS/G FUM FUML 1DN
Shotgun 18 69 3.8 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2 Backs Split 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
I-formation 5 9 1.8 6 0 0 0.0 1 1 1
Lone Setback 22 89 4.0 12 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
BY WR FORMATION ATT YDS YD/A LONG 20+ TD YDS/G FUM FUML 1DN
2 Wide Receivers 9 36 4.0 12 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
3 Wide Receivers 14 59 4.2 11 0 0 0.0 1 1 1
4+ Wide Receivers 5 16 3.2 9 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
BY TE FORMATION ATT YDS YD/A LONG 20+ TD YDS/G FUM FUML 1DN
0 Tight Ends 6 10 1.7 6 0 0 0.0 1 1 0
1 Tight End 14 67 4.8 11 0 0 0.0 0 0 1
2 Tight Ends 12 35 2.9 12 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
3+ Tight Ends 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
These stats are always a good case study in terms of what it shows when we're in certain formations. We have tendencies and kind of telegraph what we're going to do when we come out in 2 WR sets or even 2 TE sets.
It's been the same in previous years and what it shows is that the OC is lacking in his mixture of how he calls plays and, specifically, what he shows in his tendencies per formation. This can severely tip the hand to any educated defender and especially so with defenders who are good at recognizing patterns (not WR patterns, but geometric/mathematical/etc).
EDIT:
To add to this, you show tendencies in formations alone, yes, but there are also many players who can memorize what plays you run out of each formation and therefore give themselves options for how they are going to react per formation. They'll look for pre-snap keys and anything else that will help them to know what's coming. You can't just simply react in the NFL. That's where it really does become NFL (Not For Long).