olyfan63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2012
- Messages
- 6,169
- Reaction score
- 2,276
Forget for a moment it was one of the most bone-headed football plays I've ever seen...
Was it really a fumble? Should the ruling have been overturned?
I was watching the game on a non-HD TV at the gym, without audio... so I didn't have a really clear visual and couldn't hear the discussion. From what I could see, it looked like the ball came loose at the exact moment when his forearm struck the ground.
As I understand it, any part of the arm above the hand contacting the ground is "down", just like any part of the lower leg calf touching the ground is "down", even if the knee isn't touching. So if the fleshy part of the forearm hitting the ground caused the fumble, shouldn't it have been ruled down, and remained Washington's ball?
What was the rationale behind the ruling, and do people agree/disagree?
Was it really a fumble? Should the ruling have been overturned?
I was watching the game on a non-HD TV at the gym, without audio... so I didn't have a really clear visual and couldn't hear the discussion. From what I could see, it looked like the ball came loose at the exact moment when his forearm struck the ground.
As I understand it, any part of the arm above the hand contacting the ground is "down", just like any part of the lower leg calf touching the ground is "down", even if the knee isn't touching. So if the fleshy part of the forearm hitting the ground caused the fumble, shouldn't it have been ruled down, and remained Washington's ball?
What was the rationale behind the ruling, and do people agree/disagree?