2_0_6
New member
Pete's loyal to a fault.
I know it.
You know it.
Everyone knows it.
I know it.
You know it.
Everyone knows it.
original poster":2wtxb510 said:Seymour":2wtxb510 said:original poster":2wtxb510 said:I’m genuinely gutted.
Potentially great Seahawks football is simply passing us by and no changes are being made.
Caution. We don't know that yet for sure.
Absolutely I agree, but if Bev and Cable are around next season, I’m struggling to gain any optimism.
austinslater25":2vk15arw said:I'm holding out hope Cable gets hired away although with his domestic violence issues and the current landscape i seriously doubt it fair or not. Bevell isn't drawing any interest and hasn't for years so he's not going anywhere. Somewhat surprised someone in the building isn't demanding for a change at least in part because the current marriage isn't working.
austinslater25":28psrudh said:Somewhat surprised someone in the building isn't demanding for a change at least in part because the current marriage isn't working.
Jeremy517":1x01dmdy said:Completely predictable based on what Pete was saying at the presser after the final game.
Com-PETE only applies to players and not to coaches.
Fade":1yopzlnd said:Pete is lying to himself thinking all that he needs to change is the kicker, bring in a new RB, and it's all good. The problem with that is the O-Line still won't be able to block & will commit a ton of penalties thus killing drives (Cable). Meanwhile the gameplanning will be so bad they won't score many points in the 1st half (Bevell). Red Zone could nose dive if Jimmy is gone too (Bevell).
RW will run around, pull off some heroics, and get them to .500. Yay.ukeface:
If true the Pete Carroll era will be remembered for what could of been, and how he blew it.
The Seahawks 2012-2015 set a record for 4 consecutive #1DVOA seasons. They had a talent level comparable to the 90's Cowboys who won 3 Superbowls. PC Hawks teams only got 1. Pete underachieved.
Sgt. Largent":3h2r0bz1 said:austinslater25":3h2r0bz1 said:Somewhat surprised someone in the building isn't demanding for a change at least in part because the current marriage isn't working.
Pete IS the "someone in the building," he has complete control.
Allen has never been the meddling Jerry Jones type of owner that puts his nose into the hiring and firing of coordinators, or any other aspect of the team operations for that matter.
He hired Pete, gave him complete control, and that's why Bevell and Cable aren't going anywhere. End of story.
NJlargent":nustlcb4 said:Jeremy517":nustlcb4 said:Completely predictable based on what Pete was saying at the presser after the final game.
Com-PETE only applies to players and not to coaches.
It doesn't even apply to players anymore. No one competed with Walsh and I am dying to meet the sad sack who competed with Ifedi and lost.
Sgt. Largent":1offm0sq said:Obtuse is a great word to describe how Pete operates.
btw, as much as I'm ready to see if another O-coordinator and line coach can do better, I'm not for firing for firing sake. You have to have a plan of upgrading those positions.
There are too many examples in the NFL, and hell even with our own baseball team here in Seattle where there's a revolving door of dysfunctional coaching changes, that don't result in improvement.
So yeah, I'm all for getting some fresh ideas and schemes in the building, but you don't change for changes sake. Are those guys out there right now?
Mike mccoy is available.Sgt. Largent":23mw3l2h said:Obtuse is a great word to describe how Pete operates.
btw, as much as I'm ready to see if another O-coordinator and line coach can do better, I'm not for firing for firing sake. You have to have a plan of upgrading those positions.
There are too many examples in the NFL, and hell even with our own baseball team here in Seattle where there's a revolving door of dysfunctional coaching changes, that don't result in improvement.
So yeah, I'm all for getting some fresh ideas and schemes in the building, but you don't change for changes sake. Are those guys out there right now?
RussB":1stxnm43 said:Mike mccoy is available.Sgt. Largent":1stxnm43 said:Obtuse is a great word to describe how Pete operates.
btw, as much as I'm ready to see if another O-coordinator and line coach can do better, I'm not for firing for firing sake. You have to have a plan of upgrading those positions.
There are too many examples in the NFL, and hell even with our own baseball team here in Seattle where there's a revolving door of dysfunctional coaching changes, that don't result in improvement.
So yeah, I'm all for getting some fresh ideas and schemes in the building, but you don't change for changes sake. Are those guys out there right now?
I guess mroe cable and bevell then. :0190l:Sgt. Largent":2w9xk64f said:RussB":2w9xk64f said:Mike mccoy is available.Sgt. Largent":2w9xk64f said:Obtuse is a great word to describe how Pete operates.
btw, as much as I'm ready to see if another O-coordinator and line coach can do better, I'm not for firing for firing sake. You have to have a plan of upgrading those positions.
There are too many examples in the NFL, and hell even with our own baseball team here in Seattle where there's a revolving door of dysfunctional coaching changes, that don't result in improvement.
So yeah, I'm all for getting some fresh ideas and schemes in the building, but you don't change for changes sake. Are those guys out there right now?
McCoy doesn't do a lot for me, he's kind of an old guard retread coach.
I'd rather have a young innovative coordinator that can install a more dynamic scheme to help Russell meet his full potential.
But again, that's not Pete's style, it's never been. He keeps his coordinators til they get hired elsewhere, then he promotes within his own coaching tree. Because in the end, he wants total control, and any hard headed old guard coach would clash with that part of Pete's philosophy.
It's why I don't think Bevell has worked out all that well, I think Pete restrains a lot of his scheme ideas, because it doesn't fit with what Pete wants to do.