hawkfan68":1aairezk said:
Sgt. Largent":1aairezk said:
No thanks.
Of all the "Russell Wilson approved trade partners," the Bears have the worst draft capital and worst roster to cherry pick.
The Saints have least to offer. No way they will trade Alvin Kamara and he’s the only one besides Michael Thomas that is worth getting. They have a lower draft capital than the Bears.
The Saints actually have young assets to trade that play a position of need: Lattimore, McCoy, Ruiz, Ramczyk, Davenport, etc. Try making a list of young Bears players that play positions we need. It's basically Roquan Smith, who's only a need if you move on from KJ, and maybe Jaylon Johnson.
You could make the case that the Saint's have the assets to make a trade work, assuming they can get their cap situation figured out. As we discussed in the NFL forum, Ramczyk and Lattimore are all-pro caliber players, in their early prime, in the final year of their rookie contracts. Pair them together or with another one of those players, and the Saints could offset the diminished value of their late 1st round picks. So, Lattimore, Ramcyzk, two 1sts, and two 2nds might be enough to entice Seattle to rebuild.
The Bears, on the other hand, would have to blow up their future and trade away their defense to make a trade work. The major problem being they basically have to trade Mack to have the cap space to add Wilson. So they'd either have to trade Mack for more picks to use in a Wilson trade or give Seattle enough draft capital that they'd be willing to take on a 30-year-old DE. Because with his current cap hit, Mack is a negative asset for Seattle in a rebuild.
Essentially, to make a deal involving Mack work, the Bears would have to give Seattle enough draft capital to where they could reasonably attain a QB to remain competitive. To do that, We can assume that Seattle would need to trade up from the 20th pick into the top 10 of the draft, which adds an additional future 1st and 2nd round picks in
real draft value from the bears (keep in mind that picks diminish in value by 1 round/year, those picks three years from now would have the combined
real value equivalent to a 3rd round pick today). So, the Bears would be looking at some absurd trade that involves Smith, Mack, three 1sts, and three 2nds.
Unless these trade value charts are completely off base. I can't wrap my head around how the Bears could make a deal that works for both sides.