ScottishHawk84
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 728
- Reaction score
- 103
It’s evident this guy can’t perform..he needs to be done!!
Can we now sack KNJ!
- Thread starter ScottishHawk84
- Start date
Rat
Well-known member
When have we shown to be capable of sacking anyone?
GeekHawk
Well-known member
When we finally sacked cabevel
TraderGary
Active member
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
- Messages
- 402
- Reaction score
- 162
If that was going to happen, it would have happened during the bye. We're stuck with him at least through the end of this season, and who knows beyond that. But regardless of who the DC is, this is Pete's defense. I was going to write an explanation why I think this loss is on PC, but I'm still too frustrated and pissed off to do it tonight.GeekHawk":158o9jwo said:
Sports Hernia
Well-known member
According to ESPN stats, ZERO Sacks, ZERO QB hits.
Let that sink in.
Let that sink in.
samwize77
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2009
- Messages
- 1,830
- Reaction score
- 353
and how many blitzes?.....it seems to me we played scared against Murry. On D we played PC's old habit of running the ball and trying to kill the clock. The Cards D adjusted and started to blitz Russ to good effect. We just keep using the same formula on D until the end....we came up short.Sports Hernia":39h46xoh said:
At some point PC/KNJ have to see what they are doing isn't working.....I would rather die by "making" Murry beat us than "allowing" him to beat us. Start blitzing!!!!!
mistaowen
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2010
- Messages
- 6,429
- Reaction score
- 820
Defense is averaging 479!!! yards and almost 30 points per game. Next closest YPG is the Falcons at 425, who are on the verge of cleaning house.
Do they need to break 500 yards per game to finally maybe reflect on current staff and scheme?
Do they need to break 500 yards per game to finally maybe reflect on current staff and scheme?
TypeSly
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,084
- Reaction score
- 0
samwize77":2fzqtb1m said:
Have you seen our blitzes this year? The same result, as when we don't blitz.
Bigpumpkin
Active member
I think that Pete is at his wits end regarding the performance of our Defense.
TwistedHusky
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,109
- Reaction score
- 1,279
We endured years of Bevell without fixing it.
We are going to endure years of Norton.
Pete is loyal to his guys. And he has always had a problem with keeping substandard and ineffective coordinators. Way back to when he was at USC.
UW fans literally suffered through several godawful coordinators we 'stole' from USC to the cheers of the USC faithful. I am very familiar with Pete picking and keeping terrible coordinators.
It is his thing, like terrible gameday coaching. It is not changing.
Pete is what he is. An incredible developer of talent, evaluator, and motivator. He is an awful, awful judge of coaching acumen.
Carroll can have good coordinators (Bradley, Quinn, and Richard) but he has a blind spot for when his coordinators are not good, or even terrible. So he won't notice the problem with Norton and honestly, would be too loyal to get rid of Norton anyway.
We are going to endure years of Norton.
Pete is loyal to his guys. And he has always had a problem with keeping substandard and ineffective coordinators. Way back to when he was at USC.
UW fans literally suffered through several godawful coordinators we 'stole' from USC to the cheers of the USC faithful. I am very familiar with Pete picking and keeping terrible coordinators.
It is his thing, like terrible gameday coaching. It is not changing.
Pete is what he is. An incredible developer of talent, evaluator, and motivator. He is an awful, awful judge of coaching acumen.
Carroll can have good coordinators (Bradley, Quinn, and Richard) but he has a blind spot for when his coordinators are not good, or even terrible. So he won't notice the problem with Norton and honestly, would be too loyal to get rid of Norton anyway.
