-The Glove-
New member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 7,689
- Reaction score
- 0
dontbelikethat":39uv9ins said:-The Glove-":39uv9ins said:dontbelikethat":39uv9ins said:-The Glove-":39uv9ins said:I'm hearing a lot of "what if RW had teams like Manning, Brady, etc". Really? Did they not have outstanding defenses and playmakers? This reminds me of Marshall Faulk saying something like "look how Brady's done when he's had to do it on his own. Manning has been doing it his whole career." Let's just forget about the fact they've had Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Corey Dillon, Edgerrin James, Bob Sanders, Dwight Freeney, Rodney Harrison, Logan Mankins, Ty Law, Tedy Bruschi, Willie McGinest, Richard Seymour, Robert Mathis, Dallas Clark, etc. Neither has had a top defense right?
No denying they had great teams, but the premise isn't about what they did there, it was about what they could do here in place. At least that was the notion for the point I think you're trying to talk about? And like I said earlier, we don't know for certain, but in my opinion I think it would at least be similar.
What they can do here? Without the ability to buy time, they'd look like Manning in the SB quite often with the revolving door at OL. You/others say the D allows RW to not have to do as much but don't take into account that the OL actually asks him to do way more. As much as I love our receivers, they don't excel at getting separation quickly.
Manning's oline isn't great either (especially after Clady went down), it's his quick release. Maybe it's how he runs his offense that helps gets receivers opens with picks,etc. I don't know and I'm not acting like I do. Again, it's opinion and I don't think Wilson is the only guy in the world that could run this team.
It doesn't hurt to have the best receiving corps in the game