Msfann
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2007
- Messages
- 2,360
- Reaction score
- 307
I think it would be awkward for Pete, i wouldn't mind him back with the team some day in some form but now really isn't the time for that.
Bring Holmgren on as an offensive consultant!
- Thread starter kf3339
- Start date
Hawkscanner
New member
I think a lot of people are a bit short-sighted here in their thinking. As I said above, who says that Holmgren isn't already being consulted with in some form or capacity? In fact, I'd bet on it that that's already happening.
I don't want for it, but Holmy would whip that USC team back into shape in no time. The man is a great teacher and to me, the ultimate for a great pro coach (that's accomplished all there is to accomplish as a pro coach), would be to take over a program like USC. I can't think of anything more rewarding or fun.
The Radish
New member
kf3339":1jyc97d0 said:
I hate to tell you my friend but you need someone with you because you are dreaming.
As has already been said Mike nothing of our current offensive plans and he has never been much of a defensive mind.
Just let it go, he did great things for us while here but now he needs to retire and enjoy the life he's earned. I personally think he will make the Hall of Fame tho I know many here will disagree but being in that small club of having taken 2 different teams to a SuberB owl.
:les:
Hawkscanner
New member
pehawk":2yuw45d8 said:
Oh I'm not talking about what kf3339 is proposing ... what I'm saying is that if I were preparing for a tough opponent, I might bring him in occasionally ... pop on the game film and ask Mike, "What do your trained eyes see in terms of this defense? If you were the one holding the clipboard, how would you attack this Mike?"
Or say perhaps that opponent happens to have a coach from the Walsh coaching tree (like Holmgren). You might ask him, "Given our personnel, current weaknesses, and their personnel ... how might you look to attack US Mike?"
That's what I'm talking about, no more than that -- just a pure consulting role every now and then. I'm guessing that might have actually happened on occasion in the past.
Some of you guys really don't understand the role of a "Consultant". The only one that seems to is Hawkscanner, and he may be right about what is going on now behind the scenes in an unofficial capacity.
None of us know for sure one way or the other. All I was saying he is a resource that could be useful. That is all.
None of us know for sure one way or the other. All I was saying he is a resource that could be useful. That is all.
DavidSeven
New member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2013
- Messages
- 5,742
- Reaction score
- 0
I love Holmy, but I doubt any team in the league is knocking on his door for consulting services after what happened in his three years with Cleveland.
McGruff
Well-known member
kf3339":1w7f7bhb said:
Oddly enough, Mike Holmgren is not really a RW fan, and is not a good fit schematically with either Tom "run the damn ball" Cable or Darrell "chuck it deep" Bevell.
Um, I'm probably not the only one who is a consultant in real-life. So, safe to assume we know what you meant/mean.
Sorry, Holmgren's ego would/could never allow it. He's old-school in that regard, like Reeves, Parcells, Pinella, Karl, you name the sport.
Sorry, Holmgren's ego would/could never allow it. He's old-school in that regard, like Reeves, Parcells, Pinella, Karl, you name the sport.
volsunghawk
New member
No, thank you. For the record, last year's Seattle offense scored more points than any of Holmgren's offenses except the 2005 squad. And this year's offense is on pace to score even more than that. Why would we need Holmgren's input?
MontanaHawk05
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 18,582
- Reaction score
- 1,515
volsunghawk":pas20tja said:
Because O-line.
Seriously, I think that's the only reasoning here.
3Girls'HawkDad
New member
Holmgren's mustache is 23% gravy.
PlinytheCenter
Well-known member
I'm not even going to read the thread...in god's name WHY?? No thanks.
loafoftatupu
Active member
Absolutely not. Holmy is a genius, but the exact opposite of what the Hawks do. No thanks.
By week 10, the Hawks will be in the top 5 in offensive production. Both yards and points. It will start heading that way this week.
By week 10, the Hawks will be in the top 5 in offensive production. Both yards and points. It will start heading that way this week.
Rainger
Well-known member
NO THANKS, I like our current offense and scheme better under PC than Holmgren. MH made all the players play his way even if they did not have those strengths. We don't need MH messing up where this team is going to go with its current and future players.
Anguish
New member
Ask Jim Brown how well Holmgren plays with others. Wouldn't want him or his 'finesse' stigma anywhere near this team.
