Maulbert
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,950
- Reaction score
- 2,038
scutterhawk":91s6w8t7 said:-->TO YOU<-- it is "irrelevant" and a non-factor, apparently Bobby AND Millions of others disagree.Maelstrom787":91s6w8t7 said:scutterhawk":91s6w8t7 said:That's untrue, we no longer see the Silver Helmets, the Seahawk decal is NOT the "Actual" design they started with, the colors aren't even the same as the originals.Maelstrom787":91s6w8t7 said:Seems sort of irrelevant regarding the actual validity of the uniform design and its on field appearance. That's the main factor for me - does it look good on the field, and does it adequately represent the colors, history, and vision of the team. Both should be a yes.
Do I like every change?, no, but I was really never a fan of the pencil thin mustache, nor the pin stripe suits with the wide lapels either.
I don't think there is one teams uni's in the NFL that hasn't gone through some major changes over the last 45 years....NOW, the Steelers Bumble Bee uniforms? LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Sigh. You're misrepresenting my point here. I'm not saying that uniforms changing is bad. I'm saying that the design should be emblematic of the franchise.
Black has never... literally never... been emblematic of the Seahawks. It isn't equivalent toning the silver down a few shades to grey, or switching the hue of blue, or updating the logo to be an unmistakably modern update of the same Seahawk design. It's completely unoriginal and irrelevant to the franchise.
"Toning Down a few shades" from Silver to Grey...How about "Toning Down a few shades" of grey, until you reach BLACK..... it is Easy to play with words, & color concepts, eh?
Millions? What a joke.