MD5eahawks
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,609
- Reaction score
- 220
I agree. I originally thought he had it then rolled in. Though, in the same fashion as downing a punt, if any part of his body is in the endzone he is declared in the endzone. I am watching it on my PC so I can't go back but I would be interested to know what you find if you get a chance to review.HawksBrazil":3arh5j0w said:MD5eahawks":3arh5j0w said:I don't think it had anything to do with being on offense or defense. The replay showed me his foot was in the endzone when he first got possession anyway and that is a touchback.WindCityHawk":3arh5j0w said:uncle fester":3arh5j0w said:How is that not a safety? Had to have control outside the end zone, as he them got up & carried it into the end zone...?
Confuzzed.
My understanding is that a safety is when a defense pushes an offense back into their endzone. It's a reward to the defense for being so dominating. To that end then, you can't have a safety levelled against you when your defense is on the field. If it was a safety, then GB would have been awarded two points for fumbling and losing the ball, which would make no sense.
That's my understanding of the rule, and the logic behind it, anyway.
I'm not 100% sure, but I think it's not about his body, but rather the ball. I have not seen a replay yet, but he seemed to have possession with the ball a couple yards away from the goal line. Then he rolled to the endzone, in what would be a safety.
Not that I'm complaining, but it does seem to have played a role in the game. 10x2 with the ball as opposed to 17x0 is a pretty large difference If you ask me.