Anyone Else Frustrated By This?

Optimus25

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
835
Disclaimer:. With this post I'm not dissing the player or saying that i fully expected this kind of play to unfold... So ultimately I'm more pissed at fate than irvin.

Anyone else a little frustrated that at the end of regulation, with the Bengals having no time outs, and dalton amazingly not throwing the ball away, that the golden opportunity of the clock running out didn't transpire?.

Imo, irvin should have wrapped up dalton and even toyed with him on the tackle, keeping him on his feet for a few seconds. Then tackle him and intentionally lay on him an extra second or two. Just a little smarter situational football cause in that circumstance the big pop means absolutely nothing.

Could have taken them down to literally the last second to get the fg team on.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
There are rules against that and he could have been flagged for delay of game. But yes, a little more scramble could have been nice . . . or it could have meant a completed pass for a touchdown.
 

justafan

Active member
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
2,102
Reaction score
3
Optimus25":2gkexoxf said:
Disclaimer:. With this post I'm not dissing the player or saying that i fully expected this kind of play to unfold... So ultimately I'm more pissed at fate than irvin.

Anyone else a little frustrated that at the end of regulation, with the Bengals having no time outs, and dalton amazingly not throwing the ball away, that the golden opportunity of the clock running out didn't transpire?.

Imo, irvin should have wrapped up dalton and even toyed with him on the tackle, keeping him on his feet for a few seconds. Then tackle him and intentionally lay on him an extra second or two. Just a little smarter situational football cause in that circumstance the big pop means absolutely nothing.

Could have taken them down to literally the last second to get the fg team on.

You made a good point.Just laying on him a second or two could have made a difference.
 
OP
OP
O

Optimus25

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
835
HawkGA-. I don't see it like that. Dalton was clearly running and not looking for a receiver anymore. Irvin had him dead to rights. A simple wrap up and then try to force him backwards would be ideal. Two seconds before the refs blow progress stopped... Then the time for spotting etc. A smart veteran could have made this way closer imo. And a penalty means what there,?. A twenty yarder instead of thirty?. Better to try to get away with it imo if you can't do it subtly enough.
 

HawkFan72

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
16,570
Reaction score
1
Location
Bay Area, CA
Irvin was trying to knock the ball out. He was hoping a huge hit from behind would jar it loose, but Dalton was able to keep control.
 

rcaido

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
2,428
Reaction score
687
Im surprise Dalton held on too that ball. That was a huge blind hit by Irvin. After that play, it was almost meant for the Bengals to win this game. Hopefully this is a huge slap in the face to wake the Hawks up.
 
OP
OP
O

Optimus25

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
835
HawkFan72":j8g1qnri said:
Irvin was trying to knock the ball out. He was hoping a huge hit from behind would jar it loose, but Dalton was able to keep control.

And that just seems too '' Ricardo lockette school of football'' to me. The only way that would even possibly happen is to hit head on. Just body popping from kind of sideways and behind the runner is love tap in the nfl.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,618
No I wasn't frustrated by our D resorting to shenanigans to bleed the clock.

But I was frustrated by the D crapping the bed in the 4th quarter again giving up big play after big play making the same stupid miscommunication and coverage mistakes.
 
OP
OP
O

Optimus25

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
835
Sgt. Largent":i5pncuw0 said:
No I wasn't frustrated by our D resorting to shenanigans to bleed the clock.

But I was frustrated by the D crapping the bed in the 4th quarter again giving up big play after big play making the same stupid miscommunication and coverage mistakes.

I'm not EXACTLY disagreeing about your utter outrage of the defense throughout the site. Definitely some major major mistakes.

Just remember through all of it the offense had 17 points.

The bears put up 18 at Arrowhead.
San Fran put up 27 in New York.

If you think busting out the pitchforks and mobbing the defense will fix everything, I'm not gonna say they don't deserve a big ole ass kick.

I just think if the offense gets two more first downs in the fourth quarter anytime, we all sleep soundly and optimistically after a win. But the current state of the Seattle bevells is near flatline.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,618
Optimus25":2tm50tf6 said:
Sgt. Largent":2tm50tf6 said:
No I wasn't frustrated by our D resorting to shenanigans to bleed the clock.

But I was frustrated by the D crapping the bed in the 4th quarter again giving up big play after big play making the same stupid miscommunication and coverage mistakes.

I'm not EXACTLY disagreeing about your utter outrage of the defense throughout the site. Definitely some major major mistakes.

Just remember through all of it the offense had 17 points.

The bears put up 18 at Arrowhead.
San Fran put up 27 in New York.

If you think busting out the pitchforks and mobbing the defense will fix everything, I'm not gonna say they don't deserve a big ole ass kick.

I just think if the offense gets two more first downs in the fourth quarter anytime, we all sleep soundly and optimistically after a win. But the current state of the Seattle bevells is near flatline.

I'm not absolving the offense. Definitely some big issues with the offense.

BUT we've committed the large majority of our cap to the D, so I expect them to be a top 5 elite D. Period, end of story.

So reason we lost yesterday?

75% D
20% Offense inability to get first downs late
5% special teams coverage breakdown in 2nd half.
 
OP
OP
O

Optimus25

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
835
Sgt. Largent":16cpqoo5 said:
Optimus25":16cpqoo5 said:
Sgt. Largent":16cpqoo5 said:
No I wasn't frustrated by our D resorting to shenanigans to bleed the clock.

But I was frustrated by the D crapping the bed in the 4th quarter again giving up big play after big play making the same stupid miscommunication and coverage mistakes.

I'm not EXACTLY disagreeing about your utter outrage of the defense throughout the site. Definitely some major major mistakes.

Just remember through all of it the offense had 17 points.

The bears put up 18 at Arrowhead.
San Fran put up 27 in New York.

If you think busting out the pitchforks and mobbing the defense will fix everything, I'm not gonna say they don't deserve a big ole ass kick.

I just think if the offense gets two more first downs in the fourth quarter anytime, we all sleep soundly and optimistically after a win. But the current state of the Seattle bevells is near flatline.

I'm not absolving the offense. Definitely some big issues with the offense.

BUT we've committed the large majority of our cap to the D, so I expect them to be a top 5 elite D. Period, end of story.

So reason we lost yesterday?

75% D
20% Offense inability to get first downs late
5% special teams coverage breakdown in 2nd half.

I've got no problem with that analysis. I just think that the offense in their 20 percentile is the easiest to rectify. Played a great nearly three quarters and then inexplicably completely crapped the bed, to borrow your expression.

I personally just think the defense got exposed. Sherman really wasn't ever true lockdown. But that's how we paid him. Dez got him. Odb got him. Hell nick foles went right at him. Yesterday he slowed aj but couldn't cinch him up in critical plays. Honestly i always thought kam was a little vulnerable in coverage, but hes just the most opportunistic SS out there, be it with a big hit or big pick. Williams got owned all day. Earl just looks a milli second slower in coverages to me, but had the great pick.

I guess i just feel they didn't warrant their paydays but likewise they did at least play well enough to get the W. The offense dropped off the face of the earth. The defense at least made the Bengals work, ie, eiferts incredible catch.

But my original point being, haven't we seen our two minute hurry up severely stalled because russ gets sacked or tackled and it takes like three seconds just to unpile them?. Seems scored in my memory. The odds that Dalton just doesn't throw that away and actually tries to run with no chance at all of scoring are so astronomical, it's a Damn shame we didn't try to capitalize. Not shenanigans at all. Damn smart football.
 
Top