jammerhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2007
- Messages
- 10,588
- Reaction score
- 2,204
Does anyone have any theories as to why the FO has decided to keep 8 WRs on the 53 man roster?
To me this seems really odd and lends to asking a few questions. Was/is there some potential trade deal cooking for one of the other WRs or one of the guys we kept i.e.: Lockette, Kearse, Richardson, Baldwin, or Harvin? Is one of the other guys hurt enough to be a concern regarding that player's availability (beside Norwood)? Is there another reason why the team is keeping 2 extra WRs? Are these WRs really the best available athletes for the 53 and likely to be active, even just as ST players? How long do you think it will be until this situation is changed and the roster numbers at WR are reduced to a normal roster level of 6?
To me this seems really odd and lends to asking a few questions. Was/is there some potential trade deal cooking for one of the other WRs or one of the guys we kept i.e.: Lockette, Kearse, Richardson, Baldwin, or Harvin? Is one of the other guys hurt enough to be a concern regarding that player's availability (beside Norwood)? Is there another reason why the team is keeping 2 extra WRs? Are these WRs really the best available athletes for the 53 and likely to be active, even just as ST players? How long do you think it will be until this situation is changed and the roster numbers at WR are reduced to a normal roster level of 6?