6-11, 47 yards. 1 TD, 2 INT at the half

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
12,242
Reaction score
7,524
No. I'm specifically NOT good with divisive factions. The arguments about Smith were whether he was nearer #10 or #20 starting QB, whether he was value for money, and whether he was the best choice for the Seahawks moving forward. There's a huge difference between that and someone being a fan of Woolen despite his playing like the #99 CB out of 100.

Taunting Smith and/or the Raiders is entirely legitimate. Taunting the members who supported Smith as the current or future Seahawks QB is not legitimate and it's counter-productive.
Like Sperry said many of those guys earned it by being extremely obnoxious about the whole thing last year and to be fair the pro Geno crowd would probably say the same thing.

People can fan how they want and if they took a lot of crap from the Geno truthers who constantly said if you disagree "you don't know ball" and now want to rib them back a little I would say it's probably somewhat earned. It's all in fun.
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
12,242
Reaction score
7,524
Some of the geno apologist were pretty aggressive towards us more enlightened fans while Geno was still here so I get being a little hard on them now…

Hahaha I said hard on
Like I said above it grew old hearing you don't know ball if you disagree with them. People are still arguing "real film evaluators" think Geno was elite implying if you disagree you still don't know ball.
 

Ostatehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
2,341
Reaction score
3,299
People have a way of getting entrenched in their positions/beliefs/opinions, and then take disagreements with them as personal attacks, even at the cost of having to defend positions that are no longer tenable. There's nothing new about this, it's just more readily apparent in our easy access, anonymous online world.

I've been somewhat amazed how people can get worked up into a tizzy about some such issue or matter online that if they really thought about it wouldn't add up to a hill of beans in the greater scheme of things, or doesn't really have much of an impact at all in the true reality of their lives.

We live so much of our lives now in this virtual reality world. I wish we'd all start showing some more real life decency towards each other while we're in it.
Just to make my stance clear - If I use any manner of foul reference (ie - twatwaffle, douchebag or syphilitic ooze) to any of you over a football post it is purely in jest.

Now - if I drop down to using inflammatory language (ie: Tiger - Sport or Champ) then you will know I am spitting vitriol.
 
Top