Back 2 Back or 3 in 5?

Which would you rather have

  • Back to back Lombardi trophies

    Votes: 9 26.5%
  • 3 Lombardi trophies in 5-6 seasons

    Votes: 25 73.5%

  • Total voters
    34
  • This poll will close: .

Trackhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
1,673
Reaction score
1,800
Looking to the future, and the way John is building the team for sustained success has me in a curious state of peace regarding the outcome of this specific season.

For several reasons, I can see the Hawks taking a small step back this season, only to return to form and take another two Lombardi trophies in the next few seasons, and I would be ok with that. If we don’t go back to back, it won’t make me particularly nervous about the likelihood that we take another couple of trophies in this life cycle.

Obviously, we want the Lombardi every year, but if you had to choose between going back to back, only winning the two, or winning 3 trophies over a 5-6 season stretch, which would you choose?

I’m going for more trophies over a longer time span.
 

Blazenhawks

Active member
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
610
Reaction score
214
I personally don’t see us going back-to-back. I’m not saying it’s impossible, but for me, bringing in another rookie OC could hurt us more than it helps. It takes time for rookie OCs to really catch on and learn on the job.
I think winning three trophies over a 5–6 season stretch is more realistic, especially with the number of draft picks we have in next year’s draft.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
44,062
Reaction score
28,114
Location
Sammamish, WA
Extremely tough to repeat these days. I think the 3 in 5 type situation seems more realistic overall. But being a contender year after year is what I'm expecting.
 

Blazenhawks

Active member
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
610
Reaction score
214
And the Rams just made it even more difficult to win back to back with that trade.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
5,718
Reaction score
4,384
Location
Spokane
I personally don’t see us going back-to-back. I’m not saying it’s impossible, but for me, bringing in another rookie OC could hurt us more than it helps. It takes time for rookie OCs to really catch on and learn on the job.
I think winning three trophies over a 5–6 season stretch is more realistic, especially with the number of draft picks we have in next year’s draft.
Klint Kubiak was a rookie OC last year in his only season as an OC for the Seahawks. He seemed to do ok. I forget, how did the Seahawks end last season with a rookie OC?
 

MORGULON

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
10,307
Reaction score
7,065
Location
Spokane, Wa
Teams change quite a bit from season to season , I think the time is now.
 

nwHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
4,786
Reaction score
2,187
I’m perfectly happy with either outcome!
 

Blazenhawks

Active member
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
610
Reaction score
214
Klint Kubiak was a rookie OC last year in his only season as an OC for the Seahawks. He seemed to do ok. I forget, how did the Seahawks end last season with a rookie OC?
You must have been watching a different Kubiak because the one for the Seattle seahawks was not a rookie OC. Did you mean Klay Kubiak? he was a rookie OC for the 49ers.
1780346340632
 

94Smith

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
2,058
Reaction score
1,487
Klint Kubiak was a rookie OC last year in his only season as an OC for the Seahawks. He seemed to do ok. I forget, how did the Seahawks end last season with a rookie OC?
How did the rookie OC do the year before ? Different QB I get it, but last years offensive success is not guaranteed
 

sutz

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
33,624
Reaction score
11,433
Location
Kent, WA
Back to back, which would give us a good shot at 3 out of 5. :)
 

Latest posts

Top