FFS, can we pick a different term??
We ALL know they're not serious.
We ALL know they're not serious.
Is Dan as bad as Pete was at the end?I like how the posts above this one gave reasons why this franchise isn't serious. On 710 they were talking about how managers matter in baseball more than you think. And we all know Hawks don't win the bowl if Pete stayed.
Where did you see this stat btw.. he had 4 alone in may with 17 total extra base hits and 10 HRs.. his best month ever...June on the other hand... was ballsSaw an interesting Julio stat during last night's game.
He has exactly two extra-base hits with runners in scoring position all year.
Yeah, he's near career averages in most offensive categories, but that seems abysmal from one of your core hitters.
Maybe it's more of a team thing? What is it with this squad and their lack of timely hitting? Seems pervasive.
Interesting. It was on the MLB channel broadcast. One of those tidbits they flash on the screen during a player's at bat. There is a chance I misquoted.Where did you see this stat btw.. he had 4 alone in may with 17 total extra base hits and 10 HRs.. his best month ever...June on the other hand... was balls
He has a total of 7 extra base hits with RISP and 17 hits with RISP (Still pretty low at a 250 average
Pete at least has some coaching experience before he was hired so I believe Pete was better. Dan was hired because of the nostalgia he brought with fans and nothing more. Dan is terrible as a manager. Great guy and good player but he is in the bottom tier as a manager. In hindsight, Servais is much better than Dan.Is Dan as bad as Pete was at the end?