Mistashoesta
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2012
- Messages
- 3,228
- Reaction score
- 2,238
We swapped a third for a fourth. We didnt give up much to begin with.I can't believe any time would offer much for him. I'd be thrilled if they got anything close to what they gave up to get him
This is what I'm thinking too. I don't know if Howell will garner a whole draft pick by himself, but by the 5th round there may be some teams willing to do a pick swap to get a year of HowellYep, I could see it happening during the draft if a team misses out when a QB they were targeting. At least they can get a young guy with decent tools and lots of experience.
We traded down 24 spots from the third to the fourth (78 to 102) and 27 spots from the fifth into the sixth (152 to 179). That's pretty significant for a backup QB. Granted, I'm sure they had higher hopes for him.We swapped a third for a fourth. We didnt give up much to begin with.
Another ridiculously dumb trade by Schneider. Somebody is not doing their homework because you don’t trade a guy a year after you traded for him unless something extraordinary takes place or you realize he just plain sucks. Hey John, that’s what the tape is for. Amateur hour.We traded down 24 spots from the third to the fourth (78 to 102) and 27 spots from the fifth into the sixth (152 to 179). That's pretty significant for a backup QB. Granted, I'm sure they had higher hopes for him.
We're not going to get anything close to that now. It's not worth it to me for a conditional seventh or something. I'd rather just let him compete for the backup job with Lock, who has been pretty bad in his relief appearances anyway, and maybe a rookie. Hell, it's not like Darnold is remotely close to a sure thing.
Schneider would look a bit silly if Howell beat out Lock for the QB2 job and the Seahawks paid Lock $2.25M to go away. With that in mind it makes sense to trade Howell now for whatever the Seahawks can get. Unfortunately everyone else also knows this and Howell didn't have much trade value beforehand.
I liked Howell's potential going into 2024 and thought the trade with the Commanders was good business. Obviously that looks less good now. The Seahawks seem to view Howell as a bust so if they can salvage something from a bust then good luck to them. As a Rams fan i'd be happy with the Rams trading a 6th for Howell and a 7th.
Again this is an outright lie. JS SPECIFICALLY SAID HOWELL WAS BROUGHT IN AS A BACK UP! Lock was signed to the Giants and we needed a back up QB and had zero cap space. JS went out and got a back up QB on a cheap deal for a move down in the draft. The whining about this move is silly. We will almost certainly get something back as well. Painting the Howell trade as unneeded or costly is over the top hyperventilating about a nothing burger.Good points. Howell was brought in with one mission or task: to unseat Geno Smith, he was to finish what Lock started but couldn't finish. Howell was supposed to be the finisher. Howell failed, and Schneider has to do it by himself.
And there you have the perfect example of what I call... "ToffeeTalk".Painting the Howell trade as unneeded or costly is over the top hyperventilating about a nothing burger.
That is what happened when we traded for Howell it was reported that several teams made offers. I don't care if we get nothing in return. What we gave up isn't something to wring our hands about. If we get something great, if not who cares. We could still keep him and get a compensation pick next year when he signs elsewhere too.BUT, if we have received "multiple inquiries" maybe we could benefit from an unexpected bidding war?
We'll know that in about 8-9 days from now. Or at least have a better idea and it all depends on what fish are biting on what bait.Yep, it is definitely the offseason. I wonder how fishing is.